Does 9/11 Prove US Run by the Mafia?

[galexander]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

I'm no longer going to engage in your circular discussions, Gale.

I NEVER said I WAS NOT a victim of MKULTRA/Project Monarch.

Period.

End of that discussion unless you can prove otherwise.

The CIA funds and funded mind control programs.

They have all the resources at their disposal.

The money, the doctors, the hospitals, the military installations, the prisons, the institutions, the technology, the equipment, etc.

The Mafia does not.

Sure, the Mafia can USE; does use and has used "mind control" slaves.

Hence, the reason I said that I was used in CIA/Mafia pornography.

However, as I've said, and you should do some research, the CIA funded and sponsored the mind control programs and not the Mafia.

Under the direction of Allen Dulles, the CIA director, they ushered many "war criminals," (NAZI scientists/doctors) into our country after World War II and gave them safe-haven here for that purpose, but sold them to the public as rocket scientists who would be working for NASA.

Many victims of mind control programs were experimented on at NASA.

Do some research.

I don't deny that the CIA experimented with mind control.

But that does not mean to say that all mind control and slavery must originate with the CIA.

However to cause someone to become mind controlled I would deny that you need "the money, the doctors, the hospitals, the military installations, the prisons, the institutions, the technology, the equipment, etc." Absolutely any crook can make slaves. Slavery has been around for thousands of years.

What I would suggest is that when you were exploited as a child you were most likely told that because the crooks had some government officials on their side they actually told you that they WERE the government. And they led you to believe this was why you couldn't go to the authorities for help because they WERE the authorities.

Its a standard practice among paedophile networks to instil fear into the minds of the children in question.

Further paedophile networks are extremely complex organisations. And they need to be to avoid the full force of the law. This sophistication of organisation again may make them look like a quasi-government.

For example many allegations have been made about the False Memory Syndrome Foundation who claim that most of the memories of victim's of child abuse are false and based upon auto suggestion etc.

However the organisation is made up almost entirely of parents who THEMSELVES have been accused of child abuse. But is this safe especially when considering the influence the organisation has had on government policy on the issue?

Indeed one of the founding members of the FMSF was sacked when it was revealed that in an interview in a Dutch paedophile magazine he claimed that it was perfectly natural for adults to sleep with children and that it was Gods will etc., etc.

Somewhat of an embarrassment but it hardly dented the reputation of the FMSF.

[superted]

Originally Posted by galexander

If what I said about the Taliban outlawing drugs was a 'hunk of crap' kerry then how do you explain the following link:

Taliban's Ban On Poppy A Success, U.S. Aides Say - NYTimes.com

You are the one kerry posting 'diversionary topics for the ignorant to see'.

And your spelling is appalling.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/wo...n.html?_r=2&hp

[galexander]

Originally Posted by superted

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/wo...n.html?_r=2&hp

A shrewd observation superted.

But if the Taliban are now trading in opium, what forced them into it in the first place?

The American/Allied invasion.

The simple truth is that if the invasion had never occurred then there would be no opium cultivation in Afghanistan today.

But nice try anyway.

[kerry]

the truth is afgans only way to get money and live was with opium. which the mafia flew in there privet jets to buy. which was money suport for the talaban.

[galexander]

Originally Posted by kerry

the truth is afgans only way to get money and live was with opium. which the mafia flew in there privet jets to buy. which was money suport for the talaban.

So how do you explain the Taliban's ban on opium production in 2000-2001?

[jane doe]

Originally Posted by galexander

So how do you explain the Taliban's ban on opium production in 2000-2001?

Maybe it had been sprayed with chemicals?

Actions are different than words.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by galexander

I don't deny that the CIA experimented with mind control.

But that does not mean to say that all mind control and slavery must originate with the CIA.

However to cause someone to become mind controlled I would deny that you need "the money, the doctors, the hospitals, the military installations, the prisons, the institutions, the technology, the equipment, etc." Absolutely any crook can make slaves. Slavery has been around for thousands of years.

What I would suggest is that when you were exploited as a child you were most likely told that because the crooks had some government officials on their side they actually told you that they WERE the government. And they led you to believe this was why you couldn't go to the authorities for help because they WERE the authorities.

Its a standard practice among paedophile networks to instil fear into the minds of the children in question.

Further paedophile networks are extremely complex organisations. And they need to be to avoid the full force of the law. This sophistication of organisation again may make them look like a quasi-government.

For example many allegations have been made about the False Memory Syndrome Foundation who claim that most of the memories of victim's of child abuse are false and based upon auto suggestion etc.

However the organisation is made up almost entirely of parents who THEMSELVES have been accused of child abuse. But is this safe especially when considering the influence the organisation has had on government policy on the issue?

Indeed one of the founding members of the FMSF was sacked when it was revealed that in an interview in a Dutch paedophile magazine he claimed that it was perfectly natural for adults to sleep with children and that it was Gods will etc., etc.

Somewhat of an embarrassment but it hardly dented the reputation of the FMSF.

I'm talking about CIA mind control programs and the resources they have available to fund these programs and not about other organizations that can deploy mind control upon their followers.

Please do not suggest that you know anything about my incarceration in MKULTRA/Project Monarch unless you were there.

I've already written about the FMSF so you haven't told me anything that I don't already know.

Do a search and you'll find my thread.

Yes, paedophile networks are extremely complex organizations.

Such as the CIA and Mafia paedophile networks.

Instilling fear in their mind control "slaves" is standard practice so they won't talk about it.

Again, you haven't told me anything that I don't already know and/or have written about on this forum.

[galexander]

Originally Posted by jane doe

Maybe it had been sprayed with chemicals?

Actions are different than words.

But in that case of the Taliban's ban it was both words AND action.

[galexander]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

I'm talking about CIA mind control programs and the resources they have available to fund these programs and not about other organizations that can deploy mind control upon their followers.

Please do not suggest that you know anything about my incarceration in MKULTRA/Project Monarch unless you were there.

I've already written about the FMSF so you haven't told me anything that I don't already know.

Do a search and you'll find my thread.

Yes, paedophile networks are extremely complex organizations.

Such as the CIA and Mafia paedophile networks.

Instilling fear in their mind control "slaves" is standard practice so they won't talk about it.

Again, you haven't told me anything that I don't already know and/or have written about on this forum.

I know this might sound like an extremely superficial suggestion but could it be possible that you were actually mind controlled just to think that the CIA were responsible when it had actually been someone else?

Perhaps they had been devious enough to try and hide their tracks and to ensure that what you were saying didn't make any sense when you went for help?

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by galexander

I know this might sound like an extremely superficial suggestion but could it be possible that you were actually mind controlled just to think that the CIA were responsible when it had actually been someone else?

Perhaps they had been devious enough to try and hide their tracks and to ensure that what you were saying didn't make any sense when you went for help?

No.

That isn't possible.

It was the CIA and President Bill Clinton admitted that the government experimented on people; the CIA released documents under the FOIA pertaining to their programs and a former CIA director, COLBY, who was found dead under strange circumstances, admitted to Project Monarch and Ted Kennedy conducted congressional hearings regarding this matter.

Why would it matter if I went to anyone for help and implicated the CIA and they didn't think what I said made any sense?

Are you saying it would make more sense to someone if I implicated another entity?

I couldn't care any less if I went to someone for help and they didn't think that what I said made any sense.

I know the truth and they don't.

Just curious.

What are your reasons for insisting that the CIA was not involved in mind control programs when all evidence proves that they were?