Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_starfire
FallaciesAbound
Ok mr first of all i can spell and i can use good grammar (i choose not to)
for sake of speed
|
Its not a race, and as far as I can tell there is no time limit on posting. Take your time, as it will make you far more intelligible and convey your message far better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_starfire
secondly i never claimed to be super inteligent ime below average in some areas infact however i understand science in perticular quantum physics
|
Bold statement, seeing as the top minds in the field dont understand it completely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_starfire
if you do some research u will see what ime talking about is (the field)
no official name as of yet
|
There is a reason why "the field" is not yet named, but more on that later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_starfire
this states that all matter is suspended by a field which we cannot see or touch and said field can be directly affected by our mind/conciousness
and that solid objects as we think of them onlly exist in fact in our mind/consciousness
|
That is truly an example of gross misrepresentation of anything quantum physics says. First of all, in modern physics a feild is not neccisarily anything like the classical term (think a magnetic field defined by iron filings on a piece of paper), but a mathematical construct defining a position in space-time. I certainly would like to see a citation from Werner Heisenberg, Max Planck, Louis de Broglie, Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, Max Born, John von Neumann, Paul Dirac, Wolfgang Pauli, or David Hilbert where they assert that our consciousness can manipulate an imaginary construct to produce a real effect?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_starfire
in my and others far more credible than me oppinion if a person/consciousness could convince there concius and subconscious mind
that nothing existed everything would in fact dissapear
only consciousness exists and consciousnesnes is linked to (the field)
therefor if a person could learn to use there consciousnes rather than there brain theye could shape the world to there needs they could actualy change the shape of solid objects because the field is the framework of all solid objects and the field can be moulded by our consciousnes
|
See above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_starfire
there is a large section of the scientific world that agrees that solid object cant possibly exist due to the fact that electrons constantly pop in and out of existance where do they go when there not here? and atoms are 99.99 percent empty space
if this is true and the elecrtons makes up over 70 percent of the remainder
and these electrons constantly pop in and out of existance wher is the bulk coming from
|
This is a common misunderstanding, confusing electron quantum super-position of electrons with the layman's view of virtual particles. You also are confusing volume with mass. While the electron cloud may in fact take up 70% of the volume of an atom, the electrons themselves account for a tiny fraction of the mass, each weighing a couple orders of magnitude lest than a proton. As for "the bulk" as you put it, the current Holy Grail of physics is to find to Higgs Boson, the particle that conveys mass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_starfire
also electrons are far more active when view by a conscius viewer
if u have your back to something is it still there ????????????
|
Ahhh, Schrodinger and his darned cat! That damned Uncertain Heisenberg!! lol. No, they arent more active.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_starfire
the later statement i agree is far fetched but theres been lot of experimentation and a lot of papers written on this please look it up before you try to make me look stupid again thanks
|
Sorry, but I'm a bit of a scence geek, so I have read quite a bit on the subject. Im far from an expert, but then again there are only a handful of scientists that really are.