Thoughts on conspiracies in general...

[oneview]

Conspiracies in the established world around seem to abound. (over time)
Even in our private world, there can be seen, lesser rated, types of 'spiracies.
In our private sector - work a day world - we conspire, maybe, once in a while.
Some people dislike some people. Some people, we don't want to work with.
Might be in the form of "gossiping", to have an affect on someone.

Conspiracies in the established world around, seldom come to light.
Mostly they run about as - speculation.
Seldom, gotten to the bottom of.
Resulting in different, schools of thought, amongst believers - disbelievers.
Lots of fingerpointing, as if hands are clean.

Some kind of scandal, is the only real time, that the public is in the picture.
Chances are, that the public, is being manipulated, to create desired result.

What do you think?

[jane doe]

I think most people are entertained by shallowness in thought and intent. The first degree of negative change within an individual, ie. consciousness of negative intent, is 'preached' by both the Bible and other forms of monothesium. Even the family unit is geared to supply oppression of the mind and behavior.

If an individual develops a conspiratous thought process, it is initially as a defense mechanism. After the defense mechanism is repeated, then it becomes a form of entertainment and denial of free will. To deny free will is an excuse for being oppressed, and oppressing of others.

The earliest form of removing conspiracy is done thru social egalitarianism.

Very few people can conceive egalitarianism past their childhoods. They fall into the social demises of oppression and compensatory conspiracies.

[oneview]

Originally Posted by jane doe

I think most people are entertained by shallowness in thought and intent. The first degree of negative change within an individual, ie. consciousness of negative intent, is 'preached' by both the Bible and other forms of monothesium. Even the family unit is geared to supply oppression of the mind and behavior.

If an individual develops a conspiratous thought process, it is initially as a defense mechanism. After the defense mechanism is repeated, then it becomes a form of entertainment and denial of free will. To deny free will is an excuse for being oppressed, and oppressing of others.

The earliest form of removing conspiracy is done thru social egalitarianism.

Very few people can conceive egalitarianism past their childhoods. They fall into the social demises of oppression and compensatory conspiracies.

People would have to start from a shallow point in thought and intent.
There is no - full blown state - that one can commence along from.

One would not have to - deny free will.
One can oppress and be oppressed without - free will - being denied.

You mention social egalitarianism and egalitarianism,
supposedly as a concept for structuring about:
a frame of mind, concept, would not really, be practical,
in an - already existence - somehow around.

The world of "already is", would have to be, where the now, would start from.
It would have to be, incorporated along, in the long run.
Nevermind, "what-all", would go on, through the duration.(?)
Reality, as it is, cannot be overlooked, and set aside.

Feedback is wanted.