Hi I'm Blaggard and I'm..

[Blaggard]

Because you took it out of context.

I was musing on the state of society and how it would react to a government who would fix problems.

I came to the conclusion that politicians only want power and that acting in a way which will fix that particular problem would be considered cold hearted, callous, evi.
If these rulers were in a different time period, such as churchill being in the period of ww2 and not the period of the falklands war, they would be considered proud, thoughtful, for the people.

So to get re-elected they fail to combat the problem seriously and it just becomes worse.
If they fix the problem they will have dogma and programtism sticking to them whether they like it or not they wanted it. The eyes of the media may have done horrible things to them; destroyed reputations and honour.
Who would vote for a honourless fiend who commited such an such an act in this year?

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by Blaggard

Because you took it out of context.

I was musing on the state of society and how it would react to a government who would fix problems.

I came to the conclusion that politicians only want power and that acting in a way which will fix that particular problem would be considered cold hearted, callous, evi.
If these rulers were in a different time period, such as churchill being in the period of ww2 and not the period of the falklands war, they would be considered proud, thoughtful, for the people.

So to get re-elected they fail to combat the problem seriously and it just becomes worse.
If they fix the problem they will have dogma and programtism sticking to them whether they like it or not they wanted it. The eyes of the media may have done horrible things to them; destroyed reputations and honour.
Who would vote for a honourless fiend who commited such an such an act in this year?

I didn't take anything out of context.

[Blaggard]

Why do you not argue my arguements? This is a conspiracy forum is it not?

Have you never considered that those who seek to control you also seek to provide you with happiness?

A happy population is a more easily controlled population.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by Blaggard

Why do you not argue my arguements? This is a conspiracy forum is it not?

Have you never considered that those who seek to control you also seek to provide you with happiness?

A happy population is a more easily controlled population.

Excuse me, but if you fail to see that I have argued your arguments, you apparently do not see that which stares you in the face.

It has nothing to do with whether or not this is a conspiracy forum.

How telling.

Blaggard states that those who seek to control ME also seek to provide me with happiness.

WHO are those who seek to control me?

The CIA/Mafia who used me in child pornography?

Sorry, pal, but I'm just not a happy camper when someone tries to control me and, furthermore, no one provides another with happiness by controlling them.

[Blaggard]

You don't fall in line like you should.

I can think of many excuses for going after children in a sexual way; however children have been classified as learners. Anything that disrupts the teachings to the children is a potential threat for futore skills base and thus a threat to the futore values worth.

Ergo; screw with children you could be damaging us in 30 years time; we don't want you damaging our most valuable resources. Damage them and you get fucked.

You get fucked so that everyone will know what will happen if you shag a child.

It has been mutually agreed between all members of your community that for certain reasons child sex is wrong and you get punished for doing it. This is for the benefit of everyone, so everyone can be happy and continue to live ignorantly and amiably.

You don't make it look like control; but it is control. You make it look like everyone agreed to it and you learn why it was a good thing to agree upon.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by Blaggard

You don't fall in line like you should.

I can think of many excuses for going after children in a sexual way; however children have been classified as learners. Anything that disrupts the teachings to the children is a potential threat for futore skills base and thus a threat to the futore values worth.

Ergo; screw with children you could be damaging us in 30 years time; we don't want you damaging our most valuable resources. Damage them and you get fucked.

You get fucked so that everyone will know what will happen if you shag a child.

It has been mutually agreed between all members of your community that for certain reasons child sex is wrong and you get punished for doing it. This is for the benefit of everyone, so everyone can be happy and continue to live ignorantly and amiably.

You don't make it look like control; but it is control. You make it look like everyone agreed to it and you learn why it was a good thing to agree upon.

Absolutely, I don't fall in line like I should and I'm proud of it.

There are no certain reasons that make child sex wrong whether agreed upon between all member of a community or not.

It is wrong, period and most people know this.

[Blaggard]

Because everyone agreed that children are out of bounds. If you don't accept that law then you've had plenty of time to argue it and get the rest of the community to agree with you.

However you didn't and you went along with it anyway. That was your fault for doing somethign you know everyone knows is wrong.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by Blaggard

Because everyone agreed that children are out of bounds. If you don't accept that law then you've had plenty of time to argue it and get the rest of the community to agree with you.

However you didn't and you went along with it anyway. That was your fault for doing somethign you know everyone knows is wrong.

Again, your post doesn't make any sense.

[Blaggard]

I fucked you infront of the CIA and FBI, and they gave me a copy of the tapes.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by Blaggard

I fucked you infront of the CIA and FBI, and they gave me a copy of the tapes.

Like I said.

Many members of this forum cause their own demise and it has nothing to do with me wanting to ban them as superted has suggested.

Blaggard.

Case in point.