You Should ALL Wake Up! Sex With Kids Is O.K! An "Expert" Has Told Us So Get Over It! - Page 4

Nexuseuss · #31 09-21-2005, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Saturnino wrote:
Nex stays at home because his friends don't ask him to play. He has nothing to do and is bored. He decides to enter a forum to have some fun.

His game is: "since I can't debate with people who are obviously much more intelligent and well informed than I am, I will bother them for FUN."
Then he answers all the posts with any stupid thing. He thinks that people will get pissed and that is a lot of FUN. He he he...it is so funny to see people with convictions pissed off ! It is so good that I don't have any convictions, so I can tease people ! He he he. Look how they get so upset ! I knew if I would say this (even if I don't believe in it) he would be mad ! He he he.

I don't have a problem with Nex being an immature idiot as many people have stated.

The problem is that even boring teenagers can annoy people. They spit on your car, they scream by your window. They are really a pain in the ass.

Yes, you are a bore. Have fun. But we are smart enough to understand your little game. Now move on.

Your avoidance, hate, and smear campaign noted, Saturnino.

If you can't answer the applicable on topic questions about the subject matter, simply quiet yourself and let someone else with the ability to debate this subject with me step in.

Saturnino · #32 09-21-2005, 09:02 AM

Nobody can debate with you because you are not expressing yur opinions, you are saying whatever you have to say to piss people off, so you can have FUN...Duh...

Now that your game has been exposed (by several people who PMed me too), we are the ones having fun of your stupidity.

Move on...go throw some eggs on the passing cars.

Nexuseuss · #33 09-21-2005, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Saturnino wrote:
Nobody can debate with you because you are not expressing yur opinions, you are saying whatever you have to say to piss people off, so you can have FUN...Duh...

Now that your game has been exposed (by several people who PMed me too), we are the ones having fun of your stupidity.

Move on...go throw some eggs on the passing cars.

Are you this dense in real life? :roll:

My opinion has been cast all over this thread.

CONSENSUAL SEX BETWEEN SEXUALLY MATURED HUMAN BEINGS IS NOT PERVERTED UNNATURAL AND EVEN YOUR CHRISTIANITY WAS BASED ON IT IF YOU WANT TO BRING YOUR HIDDEN SPIRITUAL AGENDA INTO IT, HALFWIT.

The original question I posed was whether the author of the highlighted work spoke of any other sex acts besides sex between adolescent human beings. This has not been answered, but instead all I'm hearing is this absurd argument that the author supports infants or 5 year old sex acts because it's a hidden agenda or some such utter bollocks.

My game? :roll:

Is there anyone reading at the moment willing to concede that sex between sexually matured human beings is not perverted?

Anyone?

I can't believe that a site devoted to free thinkers and their thoughts couldn't supply just one damn voice of reason, instead of your incessant phobic ignorant fuckheaded self, Saturnino.

Honestly, you're a complete and utter moron.

Get lost.

#34 09-21-2005, 09:22 AM

Nex,

Do you have knowledge of the prostitution, pedophile, pornography, mind control, sex rings run by the Mafia, but owned and operated by the CIA that use children to serve the "sexual deviant behavior" of many within politics and military.

And, hell, the movers and shakers who attend Bohemian Grove?

The elitists who like little children and program personalities as such so that no matter their age, they can call up an alter who lives in Never Never Land where children never grow up!!!

Anyway,

This is from the following article that TB posted:

Rind brought unfavorable publicity to the American Psychological Association in 1999 when the organization published in its official peer-reviewed journal, APA Bulletin, a report disputing the harmfulness of child molestation. Titled "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples," the report by Rind and others claimed child sexual abuse could be harmless and beneficial.

"a report disputing the harmfulness of child molestation."

The mainstreaming of "adult-child" or "intergenerational" sex, as it is euphemistically called by its supporters, is the next big "sexual liberation" movement on its way, says David Kupelian, WND's managing editor and author of the "The Marketing of Evil."

"intergeneration sex" -- They have no problem having sex with children, their own children or relatives. Nothing wrong with it. A natural act. Age doesn't matter. Is what they believe. If people didn't have so many sexual inhibitions, the world would be a much better place, they say!!

"Many people seem to think having sex with children is a good thing," says Kupelian, noting "a reported 100,000 websites now offer illegal child pornography, and worldwide child porn generates a reported three billion dollars in revenues every year."

"Three BILLION dollars in porn revenue every year. 100,000 websites offer illegal child pornography. If they cared, it would not be allowed. They like the money it generates and they protect those who are the middlemen and bring in the black ops money for them and the CHILDREN into the industry.

In his book, which has been met with rave reviews, Kupelian rips the veil off the modern pedophile movement, which is firmly rooted in the controversial sex research of Indiana University's Alfred Kinsey.

"The revolutionary Kinsey Reports, as they came to be known, rocked the nation’s beliefs about itself," said Kupelian. "But perhaps most shocking of all were his 'findings' on childhood sexuality. The Kinsey Reports came to the stunning conclusion that children are sexual from birth, and that youngsters as young as a few months of age have the capacity for a pleasurable and healthy sexual life.

See your point here, NOHOPE. And, like I said, you have to try it in order to achieve results and report them. Fucking perverts.

For instance, Kupelian says, "'Table 34' on page 180 of Kinsey’s 'Sexual Behavior in the Human Male' purports to be a scientific record of 'multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males' – which is based on the criminal sexual molestation of children, including infants and toddlers, for the purposes of obtaining 'data' for his research.

You have to do the "scientific" research hands on. Where did he get the toddlers and infants? From the government's stockpile of children incarcerated in their rings. Stolen from the streets and their homes.

"It's amazing that, to this day, Kinsey, who is now known to have been a full-bore sexual psychopath, is still glorified as a scientific pioneer and cultural hero," added Kupelian, noting that a feature film, "Kinsey," starring Liam Neeson, was released last November, and currently a musical about Kinsey, titled "Dr. Sex," is playing on Broadway.

The last paragraph says it all about tb's reference to Hollywood.

Nexuseuss · #35 09-21-2005, 09:26 AM

Quote:

BlueAngel wrote:
Nex,

Do you have knowledge of the prostitution, pedophile, pornography, mind control, sex rings run by the Mafia, but owned and operated by the CIA that use children to serve the "sexual deviant behavior" of many within politics and military.

And, hell, the movers and shakers who attend Bohemian Grove?

The elitists who like little children and program personalities as such so that no matter their age, they can call up an alter who lives in Never Never Land where children never grow up!!!

Anyway,

This is from the following article that TB posted:

Rind brought unfavorable publicity to the American Psychological Association in 1999 when the organization published in its official peer-reviewed journal, APA Bulletin, a report disputing the harmfulness of child molestation. Titled "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples," the report by Rind and others claimed child sexual abuse could be harmless and beneficial.

"a report disputing the harmfulness of child molestation."

The mainstreaming of "adult-child" or "intergenerational" sex, as it is euphemistically called by its supporters, is the next big "sexual liberation" movement on its way, says David Kupelian, WND's managing editor and author of the "The Marketing of Evil."

"intergeneration sex" -- They have no problem having sex with children, their own children or relatives. Nothing wrong with it. A natural act. Age doesn't matter. Is what they believe. If people didn't have so many sexual inhibitions, the world would be a much better place, they say!!

"Many people seem to think having sex with children is a good thing," says Kupelian, noting "a reported 100,000 websites now offer illegal child pornography, and worldwide child porn generates a reported three billion dollars in revenues every year."

"Three BILLION dollars in porn revenue every year. 100,000 websites offer illegal child pornography. If they cared, it would not be allowed. They like the money it generates and they protect those who are the middlemen and bring in the black ops money for them and the CHILDREN into the industry.

In his book, which has been met with rave reviews, Kupelian rips the veil off the modern pedophile movement, which is firmly rooted in the controversial sex research of Indiana University's Alfred Kinsey.

"The revolutionary Kinsey Reports, as they came to be known, rocked the nation’s beliefs about itself," said Kupelian. "But perhaps most shocking of all were his 'findings' on childhood sexuality. The Kinsey Reports came to the stunning conclusion that children are sexual from birth, and that youngsters as young as a few months of age have the capacity for a pleasurable and healthy sexual life.

See your point here, NOHOPE. And, like I said, you have to try it in order to achieve results and report them. Fucking perverts.

For instance, Kupelian says, "'Table 34' on page 180 of Kinsey’s 'Sexual Behavior in the Human Male' purports to be a scientific record of 'multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males' – which is based on the criminal sexual molestation of children, including infants and toddlers, for the purposes of obtaining 'data' for his research.

You have to do the "scientific" research hands on. Where did he get the toddlers and infants? From the government's stockpile of children incarcerated in their rings. Stolen from the streets and their homes.

"It's amazing that, to this day, Kinsey, who is now known to have been a full-bore sexual psychopath, is still glorified as a scientific pioneer and cultural hero," added Kupelian, noting that a feature film, "Kinsey," starring Liam Neeson, was released last November, and currently a musical about Kinsey, titled "Dr. Sex," is playing on Broadway.

The last paragraph says it all about tb's reference to Hollywood.

How is this applicable to (I'm getting a little tired of typing this) "consensual sex between sexually matured human beings"?

It doesn't.

Saturnino · #36 09-21-2005, 09:32 AM

He he he...it seems I hit a nerve !
Nex is upset because he knows it is true.
Now he will have to work hard to convince people that he was not only having FUN. Unfortunately he doesn't have the brains for it. He will give up soon.

Move on, Nex, your game here is over...maybe you can have fun spitting on the heads of passing people...or putting dental cream inside people's shoes...other prank ideas for Nex to have fun welcomed. He is in terrible need of them.

#37 09-21-2005, 09:36 AM

Nex,

Did you read the article? Apparently not if the following is your question.

"The original question I posed was whether the author of the highlighted work spoke of any other sex acts besides sex between adolescent human beings. This has not been answered, but instead all I'm hearing is this absurd argument that the author supports infants or 5 year old sex acts because it's a hidden agenda or some such utter bollocks.

Yes, it is a hidden agenda in plain sight. Hidden from you because you refuse to read the article and believe that the NWO changes society and introduces their agenda of corruption into the world through tactics such as these that are "covert" to a certain degree unless you are as intelligent as I am and can see through the BULLSHIT!

WHAT DOES IT MATTER IF HE TALKS ABOUT SEX OTHER THAN BETWEEN ADOLESCENT HUMAN BEINGS?

WOULD THAT THEN MAKE IT OKAY WHEN HE TALKS ABOUT SEX WITH SMALL CHILDREN?

THERE IS NO REASON TO TALK OR STUDY OR FACT FIND ANYTHING ABOUT SEX WITH AN ADOLESCENT, TODDLER OR INFANT!!

NONE!!

Only if you want to train them to be "sex slaves" and work in the PORN industry. Get them addicted to sex while they're young and drugs as well.

These are criminal activities conducted by so-called researches.

The article also talks about Kinsey and his abuse of infant and toddler children to obtain the results in his study re: infant sexual orgasms.

The man should be in jail!!!

#38 09-21-2005, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Nexuseuss wrote:

Quote:

BlueAngel wrote:
Nex,

Do you have knowledge of the prostitution, pedophile, pornography, mind control, sex rings run by the Mafia, but owned and operated by the CIA that use children to serve the "sexual deviant behavior" of many within politics and military.

And, hell, the movers and shakers who attend Bohemian Grove?

The elitists who like little children and program personalities as such so that no matter their age, they can call up an alter who lives in Never Never Land where children never grow up!!!

Anyway,

This is from the following article that TB posted:

Rind brought unfavorable publicity to the American Psychological Association in 1999 when the organization published in its official peer-reviewed journal, APA Bulletin, a report disputing the harmfulness of child molestation. Titled "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples," the report by Rind and others claimed child sexual abuse could be harmless and beneficial.

"a report disputing the harmfulness of child molestation."

The mainstreaming of "adult-child" or "intergenerational" sex, as it is euphemistically called by its supporters, is the next big "sexual liberation" movement on its way, says David Kupelian, WND's managing editor and author of the "The Marketing of Evil."

"intergeneration sex" -- They have no problem having sex with children, their own children or relatives. Nothing wrong with it. A natural act. Age doesn't matter. Is what they believe. If people didn't have so many sexual inhibitions, the world would be a much better place, they say!!

"Many people seem to think having sex with children is a good thing," says Kupelian, noting "a reported 100,000 websites now offer illegal child pornography, and worldwide child porn generates a reported three billion dollars in revenues every year."

"Three BILLION dollars in porn revenue every year. 100,000 websites offer illegal child pornography. If they cared, it would not be allowed. They like the money it generates and they protect those who are the middlemen and bring in the black ops money for them and the CHILDREN into the industry.

In his book, which has been met with rave reviews, Kupelian rips the veil off the modern pedophile movement, which is firmly rooted in the controversial sex research of Indiana University's Alfred Kinsey.

"The revolutionary Kinsey Reports, as they came to be known, rocked the nation’s beliefs about itself," said Kupelian. "But perhaps most shocking of all were his 'findings' on childhood sexuality. The Kinsey Reports came to the stunning conclusion that children are sexual from birth, and that youngsters as young as a few months of age have the capacity for a pleasurable and healthy sexual life.

See your point here, NOHOPE. And, like I said, you have to try it in order to achieve results and report them. Fucking perverts.

For instance, Kupelian says, "'Table 34' on page 180 of Kinsey’s 'Sexual Behavior in the Human Male' purports to be a scientific record of 'multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males' – which is based on the criminal sexual molestation of children, including infants and toddlers, for the purposes of obtaining 'data' for his research.

You have to do the "scientific" research hands on. Where did he get the toddlers and infants? From the government's stockpile of children incarcerated in their rings. Stolen from the streets and their homes.

"It's amazing that, to this day, Kinsey, who is now known to have been a full-bore sexual psychopath, is still glorified as a scientific pioneer and cultural hero," added Kupelian, noting that a feature film, "Kinsey," starring Liam Neeson, was released last November, and currently a musical about Kinsey, titled "Dr. Sex," is playing on Broadway.

The last paragraph says it all about tb's reference to Hollywood.

How is this applicable to (I'm getting a little tired of typing this) "consensual sex between sexually matured human beings"?

It doesn't.

It's applicable because this is what the subject topic addresses.

Your question is what is not applicable.

Nexuseuss · #39 09-21-2005, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Saturnino wrote:
He he he...it seems I hit a nerve !
Nex is upset because he knows it is true.
Now he will have to work hard to convince people that he was not only having FUN. Unfortunately he doesn't have the brains for it. He will give up soon.

Move on, Nex, your game here is over...maybe you can have fun spitting on the heads of passing people...or putting dental cream inside people's shoes...other prank ideas for Nex to have fun welcomed. He is in terrible need of them.

If you are going to continue to act the dumbfounded clown, I suggest you do it somewhere else.

No one has yet to answer whether the original subject of the thread, the man only briefly quoted, but commented on in an unfavourable light. He mentioned adolescents in Greek history.

If he also mentioned more, I'd welcome someone to quote it.

As it stands, that brief quote of his means nothing more than what it stated.

If sexually matured human beings engaging in a sexual act is the whole basis for dissention to the man, in this thread, then you negative commenting freaks are by far the biggest bunch of illogical mongerers and phobics I've ever seen in one location.

And Saturnino appears to be the head pooba, incapable of logic, calm rational conversation, or barring that, a decent insult or two.

Nexuseuss · #40 09-21-2005, 09:52 AM

Quote:

BlueAngel wrote:
Nex,

Did you read the article? Apparently not if the following is your question.

"The original question I posed was whether the author of the highlighted work spoke of any other sex acts besides sex between adolescent human beings. This has not been answered, but instead all I'm hearing is this absurd argument that the author supports infants or 5 year old sex acts because it's a hidden agenda or some such utter bollocks.

Yes, it is a hidden agenda in plain sight. Hidden from you because you refuse to read the article and believe that the NWO changes society and introduces their agenda of corruption into the world through tactics such as these that are "covert" to a certain degree unless you are as intelligent as I am and can see through the BULLSHIT!

WHAT DOES IT MATTER IF HE TALKS ABOUT SEX OTHER THAN BETWEEN ADOLESCENT HUMAN BEINGS?

If he talks about sex between sexually matured human beings, it matters. It pretty much kills any basis for the whole backslapping effort in this thread.

Quote:

WOULD THAT THEN MAKE IT OKAY WHEN HE TALKS ABOUT SEX WITH SMALL CHILDREN?

If he spoke of non sexually matured human beings having sex with sexually matured human beings, then yes that matters also. It's not natural, and illogical.

Quote:

THERE IS NO REASON TO TALK OR STUDY OR FACT FIND ANYTHING ABOUT SEX WITH AN ADOLESCENT,

adolescent sex happens every day. Since the beginning of time. It's quite natural I assure you. The civil normality of marriage is the only thing that has advanced in age.

Quote:

TODDLER OR INFANT!!

Not applicable unless you provide a direct quote where the author states such. You haven't yet. I find the concept disgusting, but your lack of proof is quite literally revolting.

Quote:

NONE!!

whatever :roll:

Quote:

Only if you want to train them to be "sex slaves" and work in the PORN industry. Get them addicted to sex while they're young and drugs as well.

These are criminal activities conducted by so-called researches.

The article also talks about Kinsey and his abuse of infant and toddler children to obtain the results in his study re: infant sexual orgasms.

The man should be in jail!!!

All conjecture on your part.

Shit or get off the pot.

Show me a direct quote of the aforementioned article subject stating anything but "adolescent sex", or if you can't, then tell me why adolescent sex, aka "sexually matured human beings having sex" is wrong?