Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > Social Engineering
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-21-2005, 09:56 AM
Nexuseuss Nexuseuss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 90
Default Re: Nex's Game


Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
Quote:
Nexuseuss wrote:
Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
Nex,

Do you have knowledge of the prostitution, pedophile, pornography, mind control, sex rings run by the Mafia, but owned and operated by the CIA that use children to serve the "sexual deviant behavior" of many within politics and military.

And, hell, the movers and shakers who attend Bohemian Grove?

The elitists who like little children and program personalities as such so that no matter their age, they can call up an alter who lives in Never Never Land where children never grow up!!!

Anyway,

This is from the following article that TB posted:

Rind brought unfavorable publicity to the American Psychological Association in 1999 when the organization published in its official peer-reviewed journal, APA Bulletin, a report disputing the harmfulness of child molestation. Titled "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples," the report by Rind and others claimed child sexual abuse could be harmless and beneficial.

"a report disputing the harmfulness of child molestation."

The mainstreaming of "adult-child" or "intergenerational" sex, as it is euphemistically called by its supporters, is the next big "sexual liberation" movement on its way, says David Kupelian, WND's managing editor and author of the "The Marketing of Evil."

"intergeneration sex" -- They have no problem having sex with children, their own children or relatives. Nothing wrong with it. A natural act. Age doesn't matter. Is what they believe. If people didn't have so many sexual inhibitions, the world would be a much better place, they say!!

"Many people seem to think having sex with children is a good thing," says Kupelian, noting "a reported 100,000 websites now offer illegal child pornography, and worldwide child porn generates a reported three billion dollars in revenues every year."

"Three BILLION dollars in porn revenue every year. 100,000 websites offer illegal child pornography. If they cared, it would not be allowed. They like the money it generates and they protect those who are the middlemen and bring in the black ops money for them and the CHILDREN into the industry.

In his book, which has been met with rave reviews, Kupelian rips the veil off the modern pedophile movement, which is firmly rooted in the controversial sex research of Indiana University's Alfred Kinsey.

"The revolutionary Kinsey Reports, as they came to be known, rocked the nation’s beliefs about itself," said Kupelian. "But perhaps most shocking of all were his 'findings' on childhood sexuality. The Kinsey Reports came to the stunning conclusion that children are sexual from birth, and that youngsters as young as a few months of age have the capacity for a pleasurable and healthy sexual life.

See your point here, NOHOPE. And, like I said, you have to try it in order to achieve results and report them. Fucking perverts.

For instance, Kupelian says, "'Table 34' on page 180 of Kinsey’s 'Sexual Behavior in the Human Male' purports to be a scientific record of 'multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males' – which is based on the criminal sexual molestation of children, including infants and toddlers, for the purposes of obtaining 'data' for his research.

You have to do the "scientific" research hands on. Where did he get the toddlers and infants? From the government's stockpile of children incarcerated in their rings. Stolen from the streets and their homes.

"It's amazing that, to this day, Kinsey, who is now known to have been a full-bore sexual psychopath, is still glorified as a scientific pioneer and cultural hero," added Kupelian, noting that a feature film, "Kinsey," starring Liam Neeson, was released last November, and currently a musical about Kinsey, titled "Dr. Sex," is playing on Broadway.

The last paragraph says it all about tb's reference to Hollywood.
How is this applicable to (I'm getting a little tired of typing this) "consensual sex between sexually matured human beings"?

It doesn't.

It's applicable because this is what the subject topic addresses.

Your question is what is not applicable.
Provide proof that on direct quote form from Rind stating that he agreed with, supported, sex between non sexually matured individuals.

You're logic is faulty, and argument fundementally flawed unless you can prove that he advocates such with direct evidence.

Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-21-2005, 10:54 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Nex's Game

I quoted it. Guess you don't read!!!
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-21-2005, 10:57 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Nex's Game

Hey Nex,

Why are you defending pedophiles?????????
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 09-21-2005, 12:34 PM
Draken Draken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 896
Default Re: Nex's Game

BlueAngel, THANK YOU.

When I meet idiots like Nex I try ONCE to argue, then I switch off. It's a waste of time.

And before you even answer, Nex, with some remark of "oh thank you, your arguments are so bad you have to resort to insults" I say this: I don't say you're an idiot to insult you. I say you're an idiot because that's the truth. It's fact and you just proved it.

BlueAngel is right; you're obviously not capable to put two and two together and realise implications resulting thereof.

The study quoted said that young children not even a year old were capable of a pleasurable sexual experience. So in the opinion of the scientists children as young as that were "proven" to be sexually mature, and therefore the words "sex between two sexually mature people" was in this way twisted to be made "true".

This is typical euphemistic corruption of words so that you can twist any word to mean exactly the opposite of its true meaning.

But why am I wasting energy explaining this to you?

Actually, I am NOT open-minded. I know evil and stupidity when I see it.

Paedophilia is evil.

You are stupid.

I'm not interested in your opinion, so don't bother answering.
__________________
Three things are sacred to me: first Truth, and then, in its tracks, primordial prayer; Then virtue–nobility of soul which, in God walks on the path of beauty. Frithjof Schuon
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 09-21-2005, 11:39 PM
Nexuseuss Nexuseuss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 90
Default Re: Nex's Game

Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
I quoted it. Guess you don't read!!!
You quoted an article which had many references about paedophilia, but only one direct
quote highlighted from Rant which spoke of adolescents. Greek adolescents presumably existing
a millenium or two in the past. I guess you didn't understand what you read.

Quote:
Adolescent- A young person who has undergone puberty but who has not reached full maturity; a teenager.
Word History: The adolescent grows up to become the adult. The words adolescent and adult ultimately come from forms of the same Latin word, adol scere, adol ns, from which adolescent derives, means “growing up,” while the past participle adultus, the source of adult, means “grown up.” Appropriately enough, adolescent, first recorded in English in a work written perhaps in 1440, seems to have come into the language before adult, first recorded in a work published in 1531.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=adolescent
Add in the fact that the article was hosted by a web news service that had at least 4 of their 8 highlight news stories of the day, in the right hand side bar of the page, clearly anti homosexual in nature, and you'll understand why I find the article poorly written to begin with, and in a certain unflattering phobic light.



Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
Hey Nex,

Why are you defending pedophiles?????????
I'm defending the sanctity of one's written word, as it's moulded into something else by others. I find paedophilia disgusting, but I find witch hunts and phobias revolting.

If this Rind did in fact go further than adolescents having sex, or even imply more, then I'd attack his work with as much zeal as you attack me. In the meantime, barring any "proof", if a scenario of sexually matured human beings having sex in ancient Greece is all you have, may I suggest you're a poor excuse for a human being, and someone I wouldn't allow my children to know.


Quote:
Draken wrote:
BlueAngel, THANK YOU.

When I meet idiots like Nex I try ONCE to argue, then I switch off. It's a waste of time.

And before you even answer, Nex, with some remark of "oh thank you, your arguments are so bad you have to resort to insults" I say this: I don't say you're an idiot to insult you. I say you're an idiot because that's the truth. It's fact and you just proved it.
There doesn't appear to be a whole lack of proof anywhere in this thread, aside from an isolated Rind quote, and a dictionary quote relating directly to Rind's quote. If you want to go that "proof" route. Funny how Rind is obliged to present his findings in Empirical evidence form, aka research paper, and have it presented to his peers to be gone over with a fine tooth academic comb, yet any joe blow on the street can take an excerpt of his work and wax "evil" about it with no proof, then have a number of kling on joe blows quote joe blow number 1, and call it fact/truth.

Quote:
BlueAngel is right; you're obviously not capable to put two and two together and realise implications resulting thereof.
Teenage sex=babies being molested then?

Obviously I don't have your high levels of intellectual prowess, and reasoning skills.

Quote:
The study quoted said that young children not even a year old were capable of a pleasurable sexual experience. So in the opinion of the scientists children as young as that were "proven" to be sexually mature, and therefore the words "sex between two sexually mature people" was in this way twisted to be made "true".
Kinsey was quoted by the e-news people in the article, but I didn't see Rind quote Kinsey in the article, which is supposed to be revealing Rind's alleged research and findings, allegedly purporting paedophilia as a mentoring process. In fact, the word was Pedastry, not paedophilia. The only twisting which has happened thus far is in the yellow journalism of the article writers, hosted by a homophobic online news source, and commented on by a number of conspiracy forum homophobes and arm chair crusaders.

Quote:
This is typical euphemistic corruption of words so that you can twist any word to mean exactly the opposite of its true meaning.
I agree. Quote Rind about his work, briefly, then throw in another unrelated academic with strong non traditional or culturally/religiously rejected premises, and paint Rind as a paedophilic with the same brush.

Tar, feather, and send squawking, right Ichabod? :roll:

Quote:
But why am I wasting energy explaining this to you?
Because you're wrong, and you know it deep down inside.

Quote:
Actually, I am NOT open-minded.
We've already ascertained this.

Quote:
I know evil and stupidity when I see it.
My monitor isn't a big reflective mirror, but we see eye to eye on this, for sure.

Quote:
Paedophilia is evil.
Yes, it's wrong. No argument here. It breaks natural law, common sense, and many cultural and religious taboos

Quote:
You are stupid.
Coming from you, I'm eternally grateful for your generosity in this matter.

Quote:
I'm not interested in your opinion, so don't bother answering.
Interested enough to state your shakey opinions, but not interested enough to have the rug pulled out from under their feet?

Yes, the world is in fact flat. Now shush. :roll:
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 09-22-2005, 12:03 AM
Thumper Thumper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 763
Default Re: Nex's Game

sometimes I think our world is worth salvaging, and sometimes when I read articles like this I realize that we should look forward to the end. :-o
__________________
\"six or seven men can plunge the nation into war, or, what is perhaps equally disastrous, commit it to entangling alliances without consulting Parliament at all.\"

--Andrew Carnegie
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Banker Told It Like It IS Barbara What is really going on? 0 10-08-2007 12:52 PM
expert team seeker333 General Conspiracy Discussion 2 06-25-2007 11:17 AM
expert team seeker333 Share the knowledge 0 06-25-2007 05:51 AM
U.N. expert: Iraq torture may be worse now than it was under Saddam Hussein SeC Opinions 0 09-22-2006 12:41 AM
Grow up! I've been told! marypopinz Opinions 6 03-08-2005 10:27 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.