RESPONSE TO MAKOW BY EDGAR J. STEELE
<a href="http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/never.htm">Never Trust a Jew
by Edgar J. Steele</a>
September 21, 2005
I rarely use this space to respond to critics. Somehow, it seems to me to be in bad form. Besides, I find that list members and other supporters generally do a far better job than could I in nailing down the occasional oddball who tries to enhance his own name by degrading mine (the relative motion, you see, looks the same to the detractor as if he actually did something on his own to deserve acclamation - it's why bullies pick on little kids on the playground).
"Never stoop to conquer," a retiring judge told me during my first month as a licensed attorney. Some of the best advice I ever received. Every time I ignore it, it seems I regret the result. Today, however, I yield to that temptation because of the important lesson that I see available: Never trust a Jew.
The older I get, the less inclined am I to believe in coincidence. How often, do you suppose, does genuine coincidence account for things? 5%? 2%? Less? I am inclined to believe in less - far less, in fact, based strictly upon personal observation conducted over a lifetime.
Coincidence, of course, means simply what the word suggests: events that occur totally independent of one another, yet with an apparent relationship, such as time, location, etc.
I once had a client who came to me four times in three years to represent her for auto accidents wherein her car was rear ended by another's. The insurance adjuster on the other side of the fourth accident didn't believe in coincidence and insisted that she was at fault, despite the fact that she simply was a passenger in accidents 2, 3 and 4. Negligent riding, I suppose, was the tort or crime of which he was suggesting that my client was guilty. Clearly, her accidents were simple coincidence. Coincidence does happen.
In a legal career as long as mine, involving many thousands of clients, mere probability suggests at least one case like hers might fall into my hands. Hers was the only one, though I had several clients who had been rear ended twice and virtually none of them, it turned out, were responsible (as in slamming on the brakes repeatedly without checking behind). That's what coincidence looks like.
Strictly for the sake of argument (arguendo, as we in the law business pompously like to say), let's assume that true coincidence occurs, say, 1% of the time. That means that those who like to "give others the benefit of the doubt," to "wait and see" or to "wait until all returns are in," are wrong 99% of the time! Think about that for a moment.
Fence sitters don't believe that Blacks are more violent than are Whites, for example. They think it simply coincidental that FBI statistics prove individual Blacks commit 50 times as many violent crimes (rape, murder, mayhem, etc.) as do individual Whites (7 times the crime as a group, yet only 1/7th the total population - do the math). "Prove it!" they demand, choosing to ignore statistics and probability as constituting proper evidence. So, they naively sailed their boats into downtown New Orleans and were surprised to find themselves turned into alligator bait.
Fence sitters believe the fact that both George W. Bush and his father became Presidents of America simply was due to coincidence. Without his father, Dubya would have been President anyway. Riiiight....
So, out of 100 occurrences of anything, a fence sitter will be wrong 99 times. How often does someone have to be wrong before you completely discount what they have to say? I'll bet it is well shy of 99 times.
There is a reason that people become crusty as they age: experience proves that coincidence rarely occurs. That's why you can't tell an older person anything. We're worse, even, than teenagers, if you can believe it.
At some point in your life, you almost certainly will decide that you are sick and tired of being wrong almost all the time. That is when you cast aside coincidence as the explanation for anything. That is why I now say I do not believe in coincidence. As soon as I made that transition, so many things simplified for me and so much effort went out of my life. And I hardly ever am wrong. Only 1 time in 100, if you extend our hypothetical, but much, much less in my own experience. That's why you can hardly tell me one damn thing. I can live with being dead wrong 1% of the time. Believe me, it beats being wrong 99% of the time.
And that's why I say to you today: Never trust a Jew.
Are there some trustworthy Jews? Sure. But not many. My experience has proven otherwise. It is not coincidental that Jews are avaricious, cunning, verbal and always angling for an opening, an opportunity to get on top of others. What, exactly, does "I can get it for you wholesale" suggest to you? That the speaker is Jewish, of course. There is a reason, just as there is a reason why the word Jew became a verb, as in "to Jew someone down." And that same reason is why the verb form now is verboten in our society, of course.
Being Jewish is genetic...and cultural, which means the same thing. Culture practiced long enough leads to natural selection for the practiced behavior. Culture gone to seed is genetic, as I like to say. Please consult my book, which expands upon this thought at length - at book length, in fact, since Defensive Racism is all about the genetic role of behavior.
That brings us to a fellow named Henry Makow and an Internet forum entitled Etherzone, for which Makow regularly writes. Do you think it coincidental that Makow's writings appear at Etherzone regularly while mine never do? In fact, the owner of Etherzone banned me from his forum simply because I responded to another of his writer's false attack upon myself a few years ago.
Makow just wrote an attack piece on me for Etherzone, entitled "Edgar Steele's Racism - Why Jewish Bankers Love anti-Semites." Is it simply coincidental that I am unable to respond to Makow's allegations in "The Intelligent Alternative," as Etherzone likes to bill itself? Alternative to what, by the way? Free speech? Is it simply coincidental that Makow is a Jew? Of course not.
Free speech in America is reserved for Jews and their politically-correct sheep and rarely accorded the likes of me. Ask Cindy Sheehan, who was silenced and some of whose followers just were arrested in New York City for speaking out against America's war against the Iraqis, a war conceived, financed and pressed by Jews for the benefit of Jews, yet not actually fought by Jews, but by our own sons and daughters for them. Sons like Ms. Sheehan's, who gave his life in defense of Israel in that Arab hellhole.
Makow likes to present himself as being a good Jew, allied with good Americans against bad Jews, best exemplified by the never-named members of the banking elite. And he likes to point his finger at people like myself, saying that we are bad Americans for playing into the hands of Zionists and scaring all Jews, so that they flee into the protective arms of the Zionist banking elite. Without people saying the sort of things that I say, suggests Makow, we would all be just one, big, happy, multicultural family in America. Oh, and of course he claims that no Jewish behavior is genetic - it's just coincidence.
Is it just coincidence that Jews own every single major media outlet? Not some. Not most. Every single one, as in every single one.
Is it just coincidence that the international banking families are virtually all Jewish?
Is it just coincidence that, of the nearly half million American boys and girls who have been sent to Iraq, only four have been Jewish?
Is it just coincidence that the fellows who conceived of and pressed for the Gulf War are all Jews?
Is it just coincidence that Jews possess true power positions in government at all levels ten to twenty times that of their population percentage (2%)?
Is it just coincidence that every single country down through recorded history, of which Jews managed to get control similar to what they have done today in America, has ejected them en masse?
Do you believe in coincidence?
Makow is a Jew who apparently has taken up Christianity, which is a major reason, he argues, why he is a "good Jew."
Makow essentially says that bad racists and anti-Semites like myself (that's Mr. anti-Semite to you, incidentally, Makow) play into the hands of bad Jews, while good Jews like himself really are trying just to fix society. By racism, he means anti-Semitism, of course. Why use just one epithet when you can use two? After all, he's a Jew. He doesn't have to choose.
What Makow conveniently neglects to mention is that my brand of "racism" extends only to 3 or 4 racial groups, those who have demonstrated a proclivity to harm us: Blacks, Mestizos, Jews and some Pacific Islanders. My "racism," which advocates only racial separation for protection, is designed to prevent our daughters being raped and murdered and our government and industry plundered, all of which are taking place at breakneck speed in today's America. In fact, I readily accept more than 90% of the human race as being non threatening and have no problem with living alongside them, but that is something that Makow doesn't want you to know.
You see, as I argue in my book, there are two aspects to racial separation: First, one should be able to separate from any and all other races as a matter of preference, without having to give reasons (what used to be guaranteed by the American Constitution as the "Right of Free Association"). Second, we must separate from some for protection. My "no problem with living alongside" does not suggest preference, but merely lack of fear of my daughter being raped by them. And, needless to say, there is a big difference between advocating racial separation and pushing racial supremacy. After all, supremacy is what Judaism and Zionism are all about.
By preaching racial separation from those who would harm us, rather than Makow's hugs-all-around-let's-sing-Kumbayah brand of togetherness, you see, I allegedly play into the Globalists' (that's Jew to you and me) hands. I'm the divider. By separating us Whites into Racists and anti-Semites and good guys, Makow thinks to create "universal brotherhood" which then will do battle with "the real enemy: a satanic cult empowered by a banking monopoly that pervades every aspect of Western society and culture," to use his own words. Lessee now, isn't that kind of like how we destroy Iraqi villages in order to save them? Makow does his best to divide us in an effort to unite us in "universal brotherhood?"
"Anti-Semites are like dogs who drive the Jewish sheep into the bankers' pen," says Makow. Just get rid of us evil anti-Semites and then the fundamentally good and benevolent Jews will fix things for all of us. Makow doesn't mention if he has prime New Orleans waterfront property for sale, incidentally. Kumbayah, my Lord...
If, as Makow argues, anti-Semites are instrumental in the plans of those bad Jews, the bankers and globalists, then query why those very same bankers and globalists are so intent upon outlawing all expressions of anti-Semitism throughout the Western world? Indeed, here in America the ADL just shepherded its newest and broadest "anti-hate" bill, which will prosecute expressions of anti-Semitism, through the US House of Representatives. It just doesn't make sense, does it? Or, perhaps it is just more coincidence.
Consider the following: Makow lives in Canada and his web site is hosted there, as well. Canada's is one of the more repressive Western governments, one that prosecutes and jails people simply for proving false many of the Holocaust lies.
Stand up in Canada and say, "6 million Jews did not perish in the Holocaust," and see how quickly you are prosecuted for hate speech. Never mind that the plaque at Auschwitz has been changed out several times, reducing the number of Jews claimed to have been killed there from 4 million to 1.5 million. Oddly, however, that reduction never has filtered down to the figure of 6 million. More coincidence, presumably.
What's more, Makow argues for the authenticity of the "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," an anti-Semitical screed that perhaps is the number-one enemy of the Jewish forces of political correctness.
6 million Jews did not perish at Auschwitz. In Canada, believe it or not, it is no defense that this statement is absolutely and undeniably correct. Just for saying it, I dare not even visit Canada. Yet, somehow, Canadian Makow gets to claim that the New World Order is a Zionist conspiracy involving "satanic" and "Masonic" Jews, not to mention promoting "The Protocols of the Learned elders of Zion."
Is it just coincidence that Ernst Zundel goes to prison in Canada for saying something milder than does Makow and, what's more, Zundel's wife is the one who said it - and on an American web site, at that. You have to wonder how Makow gets away with it, don't you? Is it just coincidence that he is a Jew? Do you believe in coincidence?
Or, when you read Makow's attack upon someone like myself, while he pretends to be one with us, consider the following possibility: How better to divide us than with the very sort of article that Makow just has written?
And, let us not forget that Makow posted his little piece of disinformation at Etherzone, a Jew-controlled web site that long ago forbade me entry. They believe in free speech for Jews like Makow to attack me, but deny me any opportunity whatsoever to defend myself, just the way that Jew-controlled The Free Republic operates. Isn't that just special?
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why I entitled this piece, "Never Trust a Jew." Makow, in particular, is the very sort of Jew that cannot be trusted, a Jew who pretends to be one of us. From one side of his mouth, he seeks to divide us. From the other side, he seeks to force us to live alongside Blacks and "good Jews" (don't worry, Henry Makow will tell us who they are) in "Universal Brotherhood."
Like a lawyer saying, "Trust me," Makow expects you to line up behind his particular brand of hatred, which looks suspiciously like the same old brand of Jewish hatred and divisiveness.
Do you believe in coincidence?
Never trust a Jew. Rarely will you be wrong.
New America, an idea whose time has come.
Three things are sacred to me: first Truth, and then, in its tracks, primordial prayer; Then virtue–nobility of soul which, in God walks on the path of beauty. Frithjof Schuon