Does anyone have any questions for me? - Page 7

#61 10-23-2005, 01:18 AM

Quote:

BlueAngel wrote:

Quote:

fra_nothing wrote:

Quote:

BlueAngel wrote:

Quote:

fra_nothing wrote:

Quote:

Shannow wrote:

Quote:

BlueAngel wrote:
GAWD, IGWT!!!

You said it once, and I'll say it twice, the whole thing is SCRIPTED.

Even the Bruce question!!!

:lol: :-x :lol: :-x

scripted ?

nope.

frater asked if anyone had a question to ask him, and I asked a question. He's posted on other BBS that I frequent, so I asked one on a common ground interest. No pre-meditation.

Anyway, Dickinson writes much more interesting lyrics than Springsteen.

Don't worry about it, shannow. She's just never seen a well balanced madman.

You think you are a well-balanced madman!!

How sad and pathetic you are!!

Thank God, I don't have to lie down in bed with you at night!

That was Monarch. You're doing that again. You said bed, and lay down. That means that you are putting thoughts in my head about fucking you.

Am I wrong? That's what you're implying indirectly. You're saying that you want me to fuck you. And that is adultery. Go get your husband and see what he thinks of you, now.

Oh, yes, I'm going to go get my husand. First of all, he'd think you were freakin' NUTS because you are.

Oh, yes. That's adultery. Saying that Thank God I don't have to lie down in bed with you at night means just that!!!

Thank GOD you're not in my bed, cause I'd kill myself. It has nothing to do with me wanting you to FUCK me.

On the contrary. I pity the woman who may.

But that's what you're doing. You're speaking of me in the context of a mariage relationship. You're saying indirectly 'lay down in bed'. And in the context of a conversation between two people the Monarch butterfly effect is always there.

Because when you call upon the idea of laying down in bed, and then villify it to the point of outrage, then it actually inflames the concept and one thought leads to another thought.

You're trying to make me have thoughts of fucking you. That's exactly what you're doing. And you know it.

What I'm saying, is that you don't have to treat people that way. It's wrong. And it shows clearly that you're still 100% for the Illuminists that you claim made you such a slave. Because if it were otherwise, you would not act the way you do.

Your husband should divorce you for marital infidelity. Seriously. You're a total whore, BlueAngel.

#62 10-23-2005, 01:26 AM

GAWD, you're sick.

#63 10-23-2005, 01:29 AM

Strange how no one else on this board has accused me of the things that you have.

Your head is screwed up!!

#64 10-23-2005, 01:35 AM

Look, arsehole, I was here having discussions with people about important matters and then you show up on the scene accusing me of making you jack off, putting "thoughts in your head," etc.

Why don't you just GO!!

It was much better without you!!!

Obviously, you are just way too touchy and insecure.

A girly man!!!

#65 10-23-2005, 01:38 AM

Yeah, the Illuminists knocked on my door one day and prepared me for your arrival.

Gawd, you're sick.

Always were. Always will be.

#66 10-23-2005, 01:56 AM

You can attempt to blame me for your sexual perversions, but it ain't gonna stick!!!

It's called "reverse psychology." They tried it before and it didn't work.

You can try it again and it's not going to work either.

I know when I'm dealing with a sick individual who wants to shift the blame to me for his "deviant sexual behavior."

I knew then and I know now!!

#67 10-23-2005, 02:04 AM

Where did you go fra_nothing? Is there going to be another thread tomorrow about how I said, "I'm glad I don't have to lie down in bed with you at night" and this caused you to jack off?

I think you need counseling!!