Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > Social Engineering
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:20 PM
Barbara Barbara is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 696
Default Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms


Hollywood Pushes
Racial Intermarriage
Overcoming Qualms

By Henry Makow PhD
11-14-5

In the film "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" (1967) Sydney Poitier's dad, a retired postman, objects to his son marrying a White woman. "I walked thousands of miles to bring you up and want some say over my progeny."

The son rejects his father's claims replying: "Dad, to you I am a colored man; to me I am just a man."

This seems to be Hollywood's take on intermarriage and at one level it is true. We are one family, all God's children. My second wife was a Filipina.

At the same time, I am suspicious of Hollywood's motives given the fact that the New World Order is intent on dynamiting the four pillars of our human identity: God (religion), race, nation and family (gender) better to control us. They want to define us as producers and consumers.

Yes Poitier's character is first a man but is that any reason for him to negate his race and culture? Funny how a philosophy that pretends to celebrate differences, actually makes them disappear. If all Blacks and Whites intermarried, both races would cease to exist.

Hollywood studios are owned and financed by mostly Jewish central bankers. Is this their hidden agenda? Some people believe in a "War of the Jews Against the White Race." They quote a 1952 speech by a Rabbi Rabinovich: "Thus, [through intermarriage] the White race will disappear...and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory."


The main objection to this view is that Jews have suffered more than anyone from intermarriage. Since 1965, US Jewish intermarriage has risen from an average of 9% to roughly 52% today. One third of all American Jews couples are intermarried. At this rate, by the year 2040, most of the world's Jews will live in Israel, the central banker fiefdom where intermarriage is illegal.

I have yet to see a Hollywood movie about a family of European background vindicated for wanting to perpetuate its special heritage. But Jewish families are sometimes an exception.

In the film "Prime," (2005) Meryl Streep plays a frumpy middle-aged Jewish therapist who practically disowns her son for having an affair with a non-Jewish woman (who also is her client.)

The issue of race is camouflaged as a difference in "faith," as if the woman couldn't convert. The Meryl Streep character insists, "Religion is the most important thing in life" though she gives little evidence of this from her own behavior. Being Jewish is portrayed as a matter of family and food.

"It makes sense to marry someone from the same background," Streep tells her son. "Why start something when nothing can come of it?"

She also refers to the problems mixed couples have. (The divorce rate for Jewish mixed marriages is 60% compared to seven per cent for non-mixed.)

I encourage Jews and everyone else to nurture and preserve their racial and cultural heritage. In "Prime," a mediocre movie incidentally, the non-Jewish woman finally withdraws because of the "religious" difference, as well as an age difference.

In "Keeping the Faith" (2000) however, a Jewish rabbi played by Ben Stiller actually marries a non-Jew who plans to convert. His mother, played by Anne Bancroft, had disowned his brother for doing this.

But when push comes to shove, mother relents and gives her rabbi son her blessing. So does his congregation, an indication of the ambivalence Jews must feel on this issue. (In Jewish law, "Jewishness" is determined by the mother's racial background.)

In the comedy "Guess Who" (2005) a Black family voices their objections to their daughter marrying a White man. The father played by Bernie Mack, expresses his preference when he tells a colleague the fiance is Black, a basketball star who just got into medicine and knows the Cosby's.

"No matter what I say, you're going to think I'm a racist," Mack tells his daughter, "but it's human nature to care."

The sister says, "Thanks sis! I can crash the car or do anything now. I won't be the one who brought home a White man." (Could Whites speak like this in the movies?)

The daughter to her father: "Dad I need you to tell me that this is OK. People look at us as if we were strange."

There is an edgy scene at the dinner table where the family coaxes the fiance, played by Ashton Kurchner, into telling Black jokes. The first few are good-natured but after one that stings, the father says, "I think I've lost my appetite."

However dad's reservations are for dramatic effect only. In typical Hollywood fashion, father relents when he learns that Kurchner quit his job over his boss's opposition to his choice of mate.

Similarly, in "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" the white girl's father does an about-face. While opposing the marriage as "impractical" throughout and vowing to protect his daughter, inexplicably he finally decides the couple's "feelings are the only thing that is important."

Feelings are often driven by hormones and have a tendency to change. I would have ordered a cooling-off period. In this story, the couple had been together for only10 days.

But "Father Knows Best" no longer applies. Hollywood preaches a religion of romantic love and rebellion. Sex is the ultimate experience known to man. As a result, all considerations that make us human (like family and heritage) take second place.

In addition, because of Hollywood (and popular music), people have unrealistic expectations of love and sex, which may be a cause of family breakdown.

We hear a lot about brainwashing but we never consider that WE may have been brainwashed. Hollywood is a weapon of mass deception and its policy is to promote racial intermarriage.


Brainwashing is part of a process of colonialism. The whole world, including the US, is being colonized by a cartel of cartels located in the City of London, which owes no allegiance to the UK or any country. This cartel undermines racial cohesion and sows division as part of its imperialistic design for a banker-run New World Order.

_____

Henry Makow Ph.D. is the inventor of the game Scruples and author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." His articles exposing fe-manism and the New World Order can be found at his web site www.savethemales.ca He enjoys receiving comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com

__________________
I hate it when they say, "He gave his life for his country." Nobody gives their life for anything. We steal the lives of these kids. We take it away from them. They don't die for the honor and glory of their country. We kill them."-- Admiral Gene LaRocque
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2005, 04:03 PM
Thumper Thumper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 763
Default Re: Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms

hmm, I guess you were right about the "brown every man" and the Tower of Babel thing, Barbara :-o
__________________
\"six or seven men can plunge the nation into war, or, what is perhaps equally disastrous, commit it to entangling alliances without consulting Parliament at all.\"

--Andrew Carnegie
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2005, 04:56 PM
Barbara Barbara is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 696
Default Re: Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms

Thumper, this is just the run-up stage, to check the efficiency, efficacy and time element of their brainwashing techniques.

When they get their "UN Brown Man" is when they get serious and do what they did in the old Soviet Union; they would remove the men from one area, like the Balkans, and replace them with men from another area.

Over time and with all choices removed they will breed and that generation will breed again until, v'iola - UN Brown Man.
__________________
I hate it when they say, "He gave his life for his country." Nobody gives their life for anything. We steal the lives of these kids. We take it away from them. They don't die for the honor and glory of their country. We kill them."-- Admiral Gene LaRocque
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-15-2005, 03:50 PM
Thumper Thumper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 763
Default Re: Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms

Quote:
Barbara wrote:
Thumper, this is just the run-up stage, to check the efficiency, efficacy and time element of their brainwashing techniques.

When they get their "UN Brown Man" is when they get serious and do what they did in the old Soviet Union; they would remove the men from one area, like the Balkans, and replace them with men from another area.

Over time and with all choices removed they will breed and that generation will breed again until, v'iola - UN Brown Man.
I still think that level of total miscegenation is at least hundreds of years off. The time of the anti-christ is coming to pass MUCH SOONER than that.
__________________
\"six or seven men can plunge the nation into war, or, what is perhaps equally disastrous, commit it to entangling alliances without consulting Parliament at all.\"

--Andrew Carnegie
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-22-2005, 12:59 PM
Akbar Akbar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 403
Default Re: Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms

This is only a fear of white racists. There will always be races of people. There will always be a white race. The reason why intermarriage is on the rise is due to the taboo of it and the ignorance of other races. As the races start to interact and learn more of each other. I think it will decrease intermarriage more than increase it. Then again if your race is so superior then your race members should not be so willing to find mates outside of it. When whites intermarry it dilutes the white race. White scientists are prepared for the worst. They will just clone more whites.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-22-2005, 03:07 PM
Ozzy_dopster Ozzy_dopster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 161
Default Re: Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms

For want of a horse the shoe was lost. Horseshoe. Operation Horseshoe was condemed for racism and horrendous tyranny. What are these people thinking that they can dictate who marries who?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-22-2005, 07:18 PM
Thumper Thumper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 763
Default Re: Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms

Quote:
Akbar wrote:
This is only a fear of white racists. There will always be races of people. There will always be a white race. The reason why intermarriage is on the rise is due to the taboo of it and the ignorance of other races. As the races start to interact and learn more of each other. I think it will decrease intermarriage more than increase it. Then again if your race is so superior then your race members should not be so willing to find mates outside of it. When whites intermarry it dilutes the white race. White scientists are prepared for the worst. They will just clone more whites.
you're all over the map Akbar, but to answer your only coherent point, no, self-determination and maintaining racial identity is not synomous with 'supremacy' or wanting to dominate others.

Some of these arguments, especially from the 'civil rights' crowd are so ridiculous they'd have you believe that if a group of whites were to fly to Mars, and some minorities smuggled themselves into the cargo containers they would be justified in crying 'discrimination' if they weren't allowed to join the colony. :-P
__________________
\"six or seven men can plunge the nation into war, or, what is perhaps equally disastrous, commit it to entangling alliances without consulting Parliament at all.\"

--Andrew Carnegie
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-22-2005, 07:28 PM
Akbar Akbar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 403
Default Re: Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms

Thumper,
The only way you can control it is by dominating others. There will always be people who will marry outside of their race. My point was that this is a small number. Nature itself will maintain each race and insure each race's survival. This unfortunately is a deep seated fear of most whites. In the past,it lead to the history of white inhumanity.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-22-2005, 07:31 PM
Thumper Thumper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 763
Default Re: Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms

Quote:
Akbar wrote:
Thumper,
The only way you can control it is by dominating others. There will always be people who will marry outside of their race. My point was that this is a small number. Nature itself will maintain each race and insure each race's survival. This unfortunately is a deep seated fear of most whites. In the past,it lead to the history of white inhumanity.
Freedom of association is dominating others? Controlling immigration is dominating others?
__________________
\"six or seven men can plunge the nation into war, or, what is perhaps equally disastrous, commit it to entangling alliances without consulting Parliament at all.\"

--Andrew Carnegie
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-22-2005, 08:18 PM
Thumper Thumper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 763
Default Re: Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms

The thing I don't understand is why so many people are in the opinion that white people aren't allowed sovereignty, and independence from the 'multi-cultural community' because such a thing would lead to spontaneous and sudden 'neo nazism' and hatred, and that the new destiny and duty of whites is to now adopt the non-white world.

I can guarantee you that people living in the Falkland Islands who have never laid eyes upon a Zulu have never had ambitions of taking over Africa, or genociding or enslaving the indigenous community, and yet by virtue of being 'too white' this kind of 'logic' persists...

I think in a normal situation without the racial politics we've been ingrained with over the decades (white=bad, thanks to the ADL), such a situation that led to the forced integration of one group onto another on the premise that the former was wretched, and the latter group 'owed' them something would not be tolerated.

It wouldn't be tolerated by the host society due to indignation, and it wouldn't be tolerated by the immigrant class either, because it would be beneath their dignity to 'force themselves' on others, and live beneath their resentment. This is why 'civil rights' were such a joke. Before Blacks had their own communities, dentists, doctors, towns, universities, professional sports leagues, etc. This is something that was also pointed out by crowneagle, another poster on this forum.

Quote:
there seems to be a common misconception that blacks are incapable of creating a prosperous economy and need the whites to make it happen for them. but nothing could be farther from the truth. in fact, blacks had a very prosperous economy and society in the state of oklahoma in the early 20th century, so much so that an area of greenwood, oklahoma came to be known as "black wall street", as it was powerful enough to rival the wall street of new york city.
Now they are convinced that they are too stupid to be self-suficient, and instead depends on the white community for all their needs. Essentially liberals are saying that whites are a civilizing influence onto blacks and other races.

That, blacks, left to their own devices will continue the same pattern of degeneracy, violence, unemployment, etc. and it becomes a duty to 'socialize' them like they were pets needing to be house trained.

Not only is this line of thinking ridiculous, but sad since the liberals have made the blacks/minorities self-righteous about this, even though it's so ass-backwards, I don't even know where to begin.

"Because Whitey hasn't properly socialized you, that's why you fail."

"Arggh! Damn Whitey!"

Do minorities realize that's what they're supporting when they listen to these liberal crackpots? Is it a moral victory that you have forced integration, anti-discrimination, and affirmative action so that you can be better 'socialized'?

I don't know how you're supposed to develop any proper self-esteem if you subscribe to this paternalistic relationship, where you need whitey's approval, before you can become a full member of society and human being.

It's only dawned on me now how the Liberals have used minorities as a tool. They've convinced them through indirect subtext that they are incapable of supporting themselves, and that they are inferior, and that it's because of Whitey's fault. The net result is low self-esteem, jealousy, and hatred. All negative emotions. All attitudes that are self-perpetuating.

Liberals are the real 'supremacists'. They enslave the mind, and use it to score politically.
__________________
\"six or seven men can plunge the nation into war, or, what is perhaps equally disastrous, commit it to entangling alliances without consulting Parliament at all.\"

--Andrew Carnegie
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Freemasons & Hollywood -- Kings of Plagiarism! AppleOfRuin Opinions 0 12-06-2006 08:57 AM
When Exactly did Hollywood come up with the phrase "TIN FOIL HAT"? redrat11 Oceania 19 12-18-2005 09:23 AM
Jil Bandes, Bushite, on Racial Profiling Barbara North America 2 09-17-2005 05:21 PM
Why is European "racial integrity" threatening to the New World Order? Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 16 08-22-2005 05:18 AM
Operation Hollywood Draken The media 10 05-06-2005 03:50 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.