Re: I WILL REPEAT MYSELF, THE COMPUTER IS SATANS TOOL of PERVERSION!
It is perverted at human hands as are all things given to humans. The most important application is its ability to freely absorb, with your help, the essence of your world and store it for what comes should no flesh be saved alive.
No matter what number you add you always come back to 9.
examples: 13 1+3=4 13-4=9
94 9+4=13 94-13=81 8+1=9
156 1+5+6=12 156-12=144 1+4+4=9
And no matter what the size of the number it always goes back to 9!
1,233,465,957 add up to 45 4+5=9
1,233,465,912=add all up =36 3+6=9
Can someone explain who invented numbers and why 9 is hidden in mathematical solving problems?
The number 9 is not supernatural. Certain spiritual, religious, and occult teachings claim that numbers have special meaning when in fact they do not. For example, if God is a Trinity, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, that does not make the number 3 supernatural.
The examples you list demonstrate a number theoretical property of the base 10 or decimal number system.
Base 10 is commonly used in mathematics and throughout society out of habit. There is nothing sacred about base 10. It became popular a long time ago simply because people counted on their fingers, and most people have 10 fingers.
What determines the base is the number of single character numbers used and what multiple character numbers represent. In base 10, there are 10 such single character numbers: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, and 9. The next number greater than 9 is called 10, which is 0X1 + 1 X10. The number 472 = 2X1 + 7X10 + 4X10X10.
Other bases exist. Any whole number greater than 1 can define a base. For example, all computers operate on base 2 or binary mathematics. The 2 characters used are 0 and 1. This is the case because a single transistor can be in only one of two possible states, on or off. In this case, the number after 1 is 10, which can be converted to base 10 as 0X1 + 1X2 = 2. The number 11001 = 1X1 + 0X2 + 0X2X2 + 1X2X2X2 + 1X2X2X2X2 = 25 in base 10.
Digital circuits are often worked with in groups of 8, called a byte, to make it easier to code and decode data. So base 8 or octal mathematics can be used. The 8 single character numbers used are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6, and 7. The number after 7 is 10, which, converted to base 10, is the same as 0X1 + 1X8 = 8. The number 142 = 2X1 + 4X8 + 1X8X8 = 97 in base 10.
Sometimes 2 bytes, or 16 bits, are grouped together to simplify working with computerized data. Not surprisingly, base 16 or hexidecimal mathematics is used. The 16 single character numbers are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, and F. The number after F is 10, which can be converted to base 10 as 0X1 + 1X16 = 16. The number A5D03E = 14X1 + 3X16 + 0X16X16 + 13X16X16X16 + 5X16X16X16X16 + 10X16X16X16X16X16 = 10,866,750 in base 10.
In the same way any whole number such as 3, 4, 5, 22, 64, 183 or 122,835 could be used as the base of a number system. In fact, ancient Babylonia used a base 60 number system, and this is still commonly used to measure cirlces (360 degrees) and time (60 seconds and 60 minutes).
Getting back to your examples: “And no matter what the size of the number it always goes back to 9!” You are observing a number theoretical property of whole numbers, and “it always goes back to 9” only if you are working in a base 10 number system. There is nothing special about the number 9! If you are working in base 2, it always goes back to 0, in base 8 it always goes back to 7, and in base 16 it always goes back to F. I have verified that this is true, and I encourage you to do the same.
I repeat, there is nothing sacred about the base 10 number system. It was created by humans as an outgrowth of counting on fingers, and its continued use today is merely a convention.
If you are interested in studying these topics further, perform searches on “number theory” and “history of mathematics”. Both subjects are very interesting.
After you log out, you cannot edit a post, so I want to clear up some minor errors in my above two posts.
From my post about the triangles:
The bottom image covers a greater area than the top image. The difference in the areas is exactly the area of the added white square in the bottom image.
After thinking about this a bit, I realized it could not be true. The red and green images at the top are smaller than the red and green images at the bottom. Therefore, (total area of the image at the bottom) - (total area of image at the top) = (area of white square added = 1 square unit) + (area of red and green images at bottom) – (area of red and green images at top).
It is clear that the difference in the total areas is greater than 1 square unit. Assuming that what appear to be hypotenuses are actually a parabolic arcs, it is possible to determine the equation of the defining parabolas. I did that, and then, using calculus, calculated the total areas of the images. The bottom image is 1.4 square units larger than the top image. 1 square unit is the added white square, and 0.4 square units is the difference in size of the red and green images.
From my post about the number 9:
If you are working in base 2, it always goes back to 0.
It should say, “If you are working in base 2, it always goes back to 1.” The general statement is: For any base, it always goes back to the largest single digit number.
As truth seekers, it is important to really seek the truth, and be honest about what we find when we communicate with others. When we are in error, it is important to improve our understanding of the truth and communicate that new understanding with others if possible.
Because our eyes and minds have been hardwired by evolution to identify patterns and relationships to help recognize the world around us, they can be fooled by images that contain patterns that don't occur in nature. The result is an optical illusion that makes us see something that isn't correct.
I exposed the lie of the colored triangles. The following are all amazingly true.
[img align=left]http://www.waynesthisandthat.com/images/parallellines1.gif[/img] The diagonal lines are all parallel.
[img align=left]http://www.waynesthisandthat.com/images/bulgingcheckerboard.jpg[/img] All of the lines are straight.
Obviously, human perception is a bit fragile and is easily manipulated. Brainwashing the masses to believe in absurd lies is childsplay for the great rulers of today. Separating illusion from reality is not easy, but, for the truthseeker, it is a worthy undertaking.
The concept of nine independent things is not an invention of humans nor are the concepts or devices that are represented human. The ability to recognize and name and remember for future use is human. Remember that I do not require your belief. Your human centric ideas and beliefs are what causes you trouble. What I say is only for some, so let them absorb it. Go your way and continue in your way, who would want to change perfection.
Any number can have any meaning and can represent a concept or action that repeats in a way that is not related to the mathematical mechanics that number in general represents. This has been proven by your computers and what they have shown to repeat even in a chaotic system. To think that the human mind has answered all things is to be a fool. If a great disruption does not stop the event, when you sit in front of your computer, you sit in front of your replacement (partially at your own hand). I can promise you your human arrogance will not stop this next evolutionary step. The numbers being used now do indeed have power for they relate to the vibration of strings and resonate to the inevitable extinction of humankind. If you are religious, pray that some flesh shall be saved alive. If you are carnal, then continue as you are, you make our way smooth and the places of habitation that your devises will provide will be used to great effect.
Numbers have uses beyond the mundane mind of an egotist.
HOW CAN WE ACCOUNT FOR THE PRESENCE OF THESE FACTS?
How did these features occur or come to be in the very structure of the Bible text? Their presence must be explained in some satisfactory way.
The reader will agree that there are only two possible ways in which these amazing facts could have occurred. They could have occurred either by accident, that is, by sheer chance, or by design. They could have occurred accidentally, or they could have been purposely designed or arranged.
No doubt some are of the opinion that these features occurred accidentally--that they occurred in this peculiar manner merely by sheer chance. Therefore, let us suppose that there are twenty-four numerical features or facts in the structure of a certain passage. What chances are there that these 24 features would occur together in one passage accidentally? This is easily calculated, for there is a standard, recognized, scientific method of calculating chances--there is an established law of chances.
Only one number in seven is a multiple of seven. The other six numbers which are not multiples of seven have as good a chance to occur accidentally as the one that is a multiple of seven. Therefore, according to the law of chances, for any 1 number to be a multiple of 7 accidentally, there is only 1 chance in 7.
According to the law of chances, for any 2 numbers to be multiples of 7 accidentally, there is only 1 chance in 7 x 7, or only 1 chance in 49.
According to the law of chances, for any 3 numbers to be multiples of 7 accidentally, there is only 1 chance in 7 x 49, or only 1 chance in 343.
(The calculation continues on the same basis)
Thus, according to the law of chances, for any 1 FEATURE or NUMERIC FACT to occur accidentally, there is only 1 chance in 7
For 2 features * 1 chance in 49
For 3 features * 1 chance in 343
For 4 features * 1 chance in 2,401
For 5 features * 1 chance in 16,807
For 6 features * 1 chance in 117,649
For 7 features * 1 chance in 823,543
For 8 features * 1 chance in 5,764,801
For 9 features * 1 chance in 40,353,607
For 10 features * 1 chance in 282,475,249
For 11 features * 1 chance in 1,977,326,743
For 12 features * 1 chance in 13,841,287,201
For 13 features * 1 chance in 96,889,010,407
For 14 features * 1 chance in 678,223,072,849
For 15 features * 1 chance in 4,747,561,509,943
For 16 features * 1 chance in 33,232,930,569,601
For 17 features * 1 chance in 232,630,513,987,207
For 18 features * 1 chance in 1,628,413,597,910,449
For 19 features * 1 chance in 11,398,895,185,373,143
For 20 features * 1 chance in 79,792,266,297,612,001
For 21 features * 1 chance in 558,545,864,083,284,007
For 22 features * 1 chance in 3,909,821,048,582,988,049
For 23 features * 1 chance in 27,368,747,340,080,916,343
For 24 features * 1 chance in 191,581,231,380,566,414,401
* = "to occur accidentally, there is only"
Thus, according to the law of chances, for the 24 features to occur in a passage accidentally, there is only 1 chance in 191,581,231,380,566,414,401---only 1 chance in one hundred ninety-one quintillion, five hundred eighty -one quadrillion, two hundred thirty-one trillion, three hundred eighty billion, five hundred sixty-six million, four hundred fourteen thousand, four hundred one. (The nomenclature herein used is the American, not the British.)
Many brief Bible passages have as many as seventy or a hundred or more amazing numeric features in the very structure of their text. If there is only one chance in quintillions that 24 features could occur together accidentally, what would the chance be for 70 features to occur together accidentally?
When there is only one chance in thousands for something to happen accidentally, it is already considered highly improbable that it will occur at all. When there is only one chance in hundreds of thousands, it is considered practically impossible. But here there is one chance in not only millions, but billions, trillions, and quadrillions, and quintillions, that merely 24 features could occur together in a passage accidentally.
The argument and demonstration is convincing enough. The amazing numerical features of even one small passage, to say nothing of the thousands in the entire Bible, could not possibly have occurred by accident--by sheer chance. All this evidence simply cannot be explained by the doctrine of chances. If these features did not occur accidentally, then there is only one conclusion, one alternative. They were purposely designed or arranged--their occurrence in such a marvelous and mysterious manner was intended or planned. The point can be illustrated as follows:
Suppose for example, someone were carrying a bag which contained 24 oranges. Suppose that suddenly the bag broke and the 24 oranges fell to the floor. What chance would there be that the oranges would fall into four perfect rows with six in each row, each orange being exactly opposite the other? Such self arrangement would be considered impossible!
Suppose, on the other hand, you came into the room and found the oranges arranged in the manner described. You would come to only one conclusion, namely, that they were purposely designed or arranged in that unusual manner. No one would risk being called insane by insisting that such a thing occurred accidentally!
Likewise, these profound numeric features found in the very structure of the original Bible text are not there by sheer chance or accident, but by design. They are arranged according to a definite plan; they form thousands of perfect and uniform designs.
It has been conclusively shown that there are amazing numerical features in the very structure of the Bible--their presence cannot be denied, but is a truth which everyone must accept. It has also been proved that these features could not possibly have occurred by sheer chance or accident, but that they were arranged or designed. This is a second truth which everyone must accept.
Since the discovery of a design is proof of a designer, the next logical question arises---
Human Perception and Judgement
I can't believe I only got 8 right on this test of perception, 8 out of 20! can you determine which smile is fake?
Reverse Speech research has discovered that children speak backwards before they do forwards. From as early as 4 months of age they are pronouncing simple words in reverse and by the time they reach 13-14 months of age, complex sentences are forming in reverse. Click here for an article about reverse speech and children.
This example is at almost four months of age. Right at the very end of the reversed track the child says, "Hullo" Download mp3 file
Child at 4 months making noises forwards becomes Mummy, Mummy backwards. Download mp3 file
Child at seven months of age reaching out for the tape recorder - Whats that - Download mp3 file
In this example my 13 month old daughter was in the bath trying to pick up a cup. She was unable to do so and reached out to me for assistance. The reversals says: "David. Help me." When you listen to the forward note that she says "Daddy" - forwards. The reversed word, David, occurred on the forward word Daddy. This shows the beginning of speech complementarity and the young child beginning to connect concepts David is Daddy. Download mp3 file
A young child says - Please Daddy help - Download mp3 file
Child at 18 months of age - Daddy loves mum - Download mp3 file
Child at 18 months, after being moved from one room to another - I now come here - Download mp3 file
Child sings while playing - Hug me - Download mp3 file
Here a child plays with some ducks - Backwards she says "Just love to be a friend" - download mp3 file
Child at 3 years asks her play mate, why did you have an injection and she answers "to make me better" and reversed says, "I hated them". Download mp3 file
Found by RS student, Joan Corron. This child is a 3 year old girl. Her Dad had knocked over a chair which fell on Mommy's foot and broke a bone. The little girl's Grandpa says "He hurt Mommy very much". The child responds, "It's okay". But in reverse she says "It was not". Download mp3 file
In this example Daddy is changing a dirty diaper. The child says forwards, "A diaper" and backwards he says, "Help me out" Download mp3 file
Child crying - Daddy help - Download mp3
In this example a child's pants have fallen down. Backwards the child says, "It broke, mommy." - Download mp3
Here is an amazing reversal found by reverse speech hobbyist, Matt Goward on his young child. The whole track is played forwards first, then the exact forward is isolated and reversed at three speeds. It says, "I love you Momma" - followed by dad - "Your Mommy". Then the exact forwards is played forwards and backwards. Then, and note this, the the child's exact words is played forwards and backwards twice. A true mirror image reversal - "I love you momma", both forwards and backwards. Download mp3 file
A young child talks about her friend - Shes good looking - Download mp3 file
Here a child plays - Love that journey
A child get ready to sing - Shall sing it
Careful what you say to your kids. It may come out backwards - Hey fucking hell - Download mp3 file
Here, the child's anger shows in his reversal - Holy shit - Download mp3 file
In this example, my former step-daughter had run away from home. I had been watching her the whole time. She replies forwards, "I never knew that." - But she had known as the reversals says, "Daddy never knew." Not how it is almost exactly the same backwards as well as forwards. This is called a Mirror Image reversal. Download mp3 file
An 8 year old talks about subjects she is good at. She starts to tell us of a subject she is not good at but changes her mind. Note the slip of tongue - I'm not telling - Download mp3
A 10 year old tells her mother how much she loves her. Backwards she says - Do you really know it - Download mp3
Here is an example on my daughter when she was nine years old. She is singing a song and backwards she says: "I am the power. I am Oates." - Download mp3 file
Here is a reversal found on a handicapped 15 years old girl. It says "Mum-my... love you." Download mp3 file
This reversal was found on a child who has been deaf from birth - I describe this, er, whirlwind - Download mp3 file
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/annanicolesmith.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
</center>Illuminati Initiate: J. Howard Marshall, Anna Nicole Smith...and 1 dead son.
My "suggestion" for Nicole is to drop her case against the Illuminist, Marshal family fortune, (for her saftey) and her newborns safety.
The Old Mafia, The New Mafia: Mexican Mayhem on Americas Streets!
The Mexican "Patron Drug Saint" Jesus Malverde.
The old Italian Mafia has somewhat dissappeared, in It's place walk in the Mexican Mafia, now numbering in the 100,000 member figure nationwide, moving some 1,000,000,000 dollars of drugs nationwide! :-?
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/aab.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>