The Great Seal of American Freemasonry

spectre wrote:
My intention is not to be vague in anyway. If you look through this thread, you will see a number of questions directed at me, by you, and I didn't want to answer for myself yet again. Your point is taken however... a simple answer for a simple question.

Exactly. A simple question deserves a simple answer.

When one doesn't want to give the true answer to a question such as "what do the dots mean?", they give many answers as you have done here.

If you don't answer for yourself, who then answers for you?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:

Exactly. A simple question deserves a simple answer.

When one doesn't want to give the true answer to a question such as "what do the dots mean?", they give many answers as you have done here.

If you don't answer for yourself, who then answers for you?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Ughh. To explain myself yet again...

First off, I pointed you to an excellent reference regarding "..."

BlueAngel wrote:
So, why'd you pull up this thread without making any serious comment?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:
Who was the poster you were reponding to? You didn't quote them. You made a blanket, "thank you for posting" comment.

How long since the post was made and the time you came here to say thank you?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:
How would you KNOW what I KNOW?

What is the name of this famous musician of whom I speak?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:
What is his name?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:
.....

What do the dots represent?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:
What are you intentionally omitting?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

question upon question upon question upon...

I simply didn't feel like answering yet another question about something that had NOTHING to do with you whatsoever.

something out of nothing out of...

This isn't constructive in anyway and the general tone from the beginning was in no way welcoming or positive. I did not appreciate the accusatory tone, assumptions and overall critique of all that was a comment I left in this thread not directed to you. They accepted my acknowledgement of their contribution to what was a discussion before all of this inquiry and negativity took over.

I seemed to have sparked some reaction out of you though. You seem to desire conflict... which I'm not opposed to where it is constructive in some form. Whatever the reason/s for your need to question what I say, when I say it, why I say it, what it means, who I am saying it to, etc. by my own choice is none of my business. For this reason, please don't continue to make make it my business.

Why? Why why?

If you have a problem with me for any reason at all - just ignore me! Otherwise, I will continue to attempt communication with you.

Who answers for me? I.

Only I and the devil can answer for me.

Spectre said:

"Only I and the devil can answer for me."

A simple question receives a mound of garbage.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

[redrat11]

<center>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/05defee4.gif" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
</center>

Well, now, Spectre, as I've stated before, the art of extraction, a very fine one indeed.

I know what the "dots" represent, but thank you for allowing all others on the board the opportunity to learn what significance the dots have insofar as that famous musician is concerned.

You have provided a very nice example in your last comment.

I will explain it for the rest of the readers.

Where I have asked another poster on the board "what is his name" (referring to the musician who was my handler/controller), the next comment on the thread was made by Spectre and they were the infamous dots.

This means, the name of the musician should not be spoken. Omit. Leave out. Just as the definition for dots is explained when used within text...ommission.

These dots were used very often on HIS site while I was being held there against my own free will.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

You really only needed the following quotes, however.

It went like this:

BlueAngel said to Shadow:

What is his name?

Spectre said:
...

This also lends a clue as far as Shadow is concerned.

It's clear what his/her purpose is, but nonethless.

As I was asking Shadow repeatedly the name of the musician, Spectre came in with the dots.

So, we may be able to make an assumption that, as I have suspected, and, I'm sure the rest of you as well, he/she is being controlled. Yes, as in "mind controlled."

Had the dots not been posted, Shadow may have answered my question.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

[Shadow]

You are a pathetic little troll in need of attention.

Thanks to you and the other teeny trolls, you have destroyed this site!

Yo Da DuNg BunG, Ass

Shadow wrote:
You are a pathetic little troll in need of attention.

Thanks to you and the other teeny trolls, you have destroyed this site!

Why don't you write Dr. Makow. Maybe he'll ban me and keep you on.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:
Spectre said:

"Only I and the devil can answer for me."

A simple question receives a mound of garbage.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Well but I somehow do not foresee Christ making excuses for the insignicant tendencies of mankind. The devil would of course. The devil is always willing to offer sympathy and justification.

You get no less from my responses than what you desire to. Isn't everything what we make of it?