I was just asking a question..I read most of the thread..
why should I refrain from asking questions that DO clearly apply.
Blue angel is going on and on about springsteen..I just wanted to know if she had even met him..
Gees whats with the aggro?
I don't know what she means by handler.
Since the inception of CC, there exists on this forum a very large population of members whose only agenda on this site is to post disinformation; cause interference; harrass and attempt to trigger/alter me and/or or expect me to agree with every ridiculous conspiracy they post in an effort to discredit me.
I will say it again.
I cannot be discredited.
The evidence speaks for itself.
People who supposedly were helping me in the past when a victim of MKULTRA/Project Monarch and in the not so distant past when on Springsteen's site turned out to be perpetrators, so, yes, I am aggressive.
It saved my life from the CULT when I was a child and assisted me in maintaining my psychological, mental, and emotional state of mind when I feel back into Springsteen's hands and the other mind controllers on his site and to avert the PSYCHOTIC BREAK the perpetrators so desire, but will never attain.
Being agressive has also helped me to keep control of my own mind.
Past and present.
So, yes, I am aggressive and I consider it an asset.
And you have every right to be, The wrongly quoted message of Prunerman seemed a bit odd I know.
And yes, I'm worried the video is a new way to brainwash the Monarchslaves still under control.
I recently read this page
BlueAngel, I hope your experience is over with the Springsteen site. Going back to an abusive relationship is unhealthy. Rereading your poem and learniing about your internet abuse..isn't that too much power you give your husband over yourself?
what do you mean by handler ?
Is it common for handlers and mind control victims not to know each other?
Okay after doing some research on MC..the stories that these people tell seem a bit unbelievable.
Im sorry for saying you were a vicious bitch BA.
I just don't know, part of me wants to believe its true and part of me wants to believe it's not true.
A HANDLER/CONTROLLER of a mind control victim is able to alter the state of mind of their SLAVE through the use of codes, keys, commands/triggers, etc.
Through the use of these codes, keys, commands/triggers, etc., the handler/controller is able to access all five levels of programming of their SLAVE; therefore affecting the state of mind of their victim psychologically, emotionally and mentally.
In this way, the HANDLER is also able to retrieve alters that are used for various purposes; illegal and otherwise.
In this respect, an unhealthy, abusive interaction exists between SLAVE and OWNER(s) and HANDLER/CONTROLLER(s), because POWER and CONTROL belongs to the HANDLER(s) as the victim is void of free will.
Hence, the words MIND CONTROL.
Thanks for clearing that up.
I was reading from a website here Mind Control-The Ultimate Terror
about how the cell phone towers aren't really towers. but rather mind control towers.
how do we protect ourselves from mind control?
Read to page 49 so far of your thread.
Where I'm making this comment from.
Always thought the way the lyrics of songs were written,
had to do with the "audience" the music world was catering to.
What you go on about in your thread, puts it in a different light.
The light you put it in, is quite "believable".
Never noticed of my own and no doubt never would have.
You mention that these "popular stars" are from having been
in the same boat as yourself and others.
In general you appear to understand thier plight.
It's obvious, however, that you are singling one out in particular.
You have no place in your understanding for this person, unlike the others.
You say it's because of how you see him in particular, in relation to you.
These others would also be seen in relation, in particular, to other victims.
Yet you "vent" yourself at this one person, and "somewhat side" with
these others, like you see thier plight in what has gone on.
You seem to be immersed in yourself with this one person in particular
from appears to be "altering" states of mind.
Obviously you want to hang on to your thoughts in such direction.
So far, in particular, I'm saying: you are fixated on this one person,
from your victimised stance, not having this same view of the others,
even though there would be someone else there that was victimised.
(seeing them, as yourself, as all in the same boat)
Last edited by upagainstit : 02-17-2010 at 01:37 PM.