Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > Social Engineering
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-09-2007, 11:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Barabara Hartwell Part2: Barbara Hartwell


Quote:
redrat11 wrote:
Yes Maam, your the TRUTH, and only the truth, I have no consideration in your mental development, nor have I ever pretended too have!!

Yes, it's my experience. You would have no knowledge regarding same and to think that you would is to be delusional. Yes you have preteneded.

Now please leave me the HELL alone, and let me post my 'OPINIONS' without your corrosive interference! YES!!!! (are you capable of this???)

Role reversal again. The one who interferes with my threads, discusses me on other threads with others and then expects that I shouldn't respond. The one who acts like I'm interfering with his posts when HE interferes with mine.

I'm quite capable of it, but you're not.


In Peace,
BlueAngel

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-10-2007, 12:13 AM
LaDominio LaDominio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 793
Default Re: Barabara Hartwell Part2: Barbara Hartwell

Remember RedRat and BA, these words here are just clashing opinions. There is no need to attach any kind of emotion to them. And in truth these clashing opinions dont matter because they hold no substance - just concept.
__________________
Demographics? Metaphysics? Scientific? Chemistry? Ecology? Psychology? Sociology? Entropy?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-10-2007, 09:42 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Barabara Hartwell Part2: Barbara Hartwell

Quote:
LaDominio wrote:
Remember RedRat and BA, these words here are just clashing opinions. There is no need to attach any kind of emotion to them. And in truth these clashing opinions dont matter because they hold no substance - just concept.
What clashing opinions?

I suppose you're referring to the "Mind Control within the Music Industry" thread.

It is my experience and therefore, it is not a concept, but does hold substance.

My opinion/experience cannot be diminshed by someone who either has a vested interest in protecting my past handler/controller and/or the industry itself. Nor can it be swayed or changed by anyone who is without knowledge regarding same.

Again, LaDomino, is your role here to play an intermediary, of which, as stated previously I do not solicit or need.

In Peace,
BlueAngel
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-10-2007, 09:43 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Barabara Hartwell Part2: Barbara Hartwell

Quote:
George_Bush wrote:
Interesting
George_Bush comes out from behind the "grassy knoll."

In Peace,
BlueAngel
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Barbara Hartwell Part 3: The Jane Fonda Legacy George_Bush General Conspiracy Discussion 31 02-15-2007 07:16 AM
Barbara Hartwell Part 4: It's Barbs - and the CIA, and some Illuminati, and, gosh, I don' know, mayb George_Bush General Conspiracy Discussion 4 02-12-2007 08:09 PM
Barbara Hartwell igwt New World Order operatives 28 02-12-2007 06:28 PM
Barbara Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 2 11-24-2005 04:08 AM
Part2 Of Pentagons New Map Up Now. truebeliever New World Order operatives 3 09-05-2005 05:51 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.