Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > General Conspiracy Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-2007, 05:18 PM
CB_Brooklyn CB_Brooklyn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26
Default U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case


Dr Morgan Reynolds is the former Chief Economist of the US Dept of Labor and is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart.

Reynolds is demanding a Trial By Jury.



================================================== =

http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case

Reynolds Makes a Federal Case of 9/11 —
Sues NIST Contractors for 9/11 Plane Fraud


Morgan Reynolds
August 21, 2007

Summary:

Last month, the U.S. District Court, Southern New York, unsealed a 9/11 case filed by Dr. Morgan Reynolds, thereby making the case public. Reynolds is suing on behalf of the United States of America after the U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York who represents "the government" declined to intervene in the case. The suit, a so-called qui tam case, alleges that the 9/11 contractors NIST hired to investigate destruction of the WTC Towers on 9/11 defrauded the U.S. government of substantial money by rendering bogus, impossible physical analysis and animations about how two hollow aluminum aircraft (allegedly Boeing 767s) flew into a steel/concrete tower and disappeared. Yet it can be easily demonstrated, after a great deal of hard work by dedicated 9/11 researchers, that no planes hit the towers. The office of Reynolds' attorney, Jerry V. Leaphart of Connecticut, is now serving(notifying) the defendants in the suit, including Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), Applied Research Associates (ARA), Boeing, American Airlines, United Airlines and Silverstein Properties. I will post new information on the case as developments warrant.

Unsealed Complaint PDF here.
http://nomoregames.net/911/federal_case/07cv4612unsealedcomplaint.pdf

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-28-2007, 05:48 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case

I do like the sound of the words, "Federal Case," but there is something very puzzling about this!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-28-2007, 05:52 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case

How was it that NO PLANES hit the towers, but what we saw on television were planes hanging out of the towers?

Have the 911 researchers explained this?

How was it that the planes disappeared?

Is that because there were no pieces recovered of their wreckage?

or

Because they obviously burned to ashes with the towers.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-28-2007, 06:00 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case

This case is being filed on BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT because they were defrauded from substantial money due to the negligence of NIST investigators hired by them to report the findings of 911 and the Twin Towers.

Money from whom?

The victims?

I'd also like to know the names of the 911 researchers whom this article seems to rely on solely as their defense.

Like I said, it MAKES NO SENSE!

GARBAGE!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-28-2007, 06:03 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case

When there are more questions than answers, that is a sign!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-28-2007, 06:13 PM
CB_Brooklyn CB_Brooklyn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26
Default Re: U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case

Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
This case is being filed on BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT because they were defrauded from substantial money due to the negligence of NIST investigators hired by them to report the findings of 911 and the Twin Towers.

Money from whom?

The victims?

I'd also like to know the names of the 911 researchers whom this article seems to rely on solely as their defense.

Like I said, it MAKES NO SENSE!

GARBAGE!

NIST paid private contractors. Read the complaint.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-28-2007, 06:16 PM
CB_Brooklyn CB_Brooklyn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26
Default Re: U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case

Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
How was it that NO PLANES hit the towers, but what we saw on television were planes hanging out of the towers?

Have the 911 researchers explained this?

How was it that the planes disappeared?

Is that because there were no pieces recovered of their wreckage?

or

Because they obviously burned to ashes with the towers.

The corporate media was broadcasting cartoons on 9/11. Aluminum airplanes don't glide through steel and concrete. All videos are archived here:
http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html


Dr Reynolds and his Request for Correction (linked on his site) are considered the "source" for the information.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-28-2007, 06:48 PM
redrat11 redrat11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,203
Default Re: U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case

Yeah, it was a "inside job" alright, but not the people you 'think' are involved.

http://www.mitre.org/about/ffrdcs/c3i.html

Customers

The DOD C3I FFRDC supports a broad base of customers within the DOD and intelligence community, including:

Air Force
Army
Navy
Marine Corps
Defense Information Systems Agency
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Missile Defense Agency
Unified Commands
Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Office of the Secretary of Defense
Military Intelligence Agencies
Other Members of the National Security Community
To work hand-in-hand with our clients, MITRE staff members work at sites around the world.



http://www.mitre.org/about/ffrdcs/c3i.html
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-28-2007, 06:48 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case

The airplanes did not glide through the towers. They were hanging out of the towers.

As far as your cartoon comment, it's over my head.

If you're insinuating that what we saw on television when the planes crashed into the towers, were cartoons, I don't buy it.

I'm sure you know I am not a fan of the US government and that I am certain 911 was an inside job.

I read the complaint and outlined what "sticks out like a sore thumb."

You have not answered my questions.

The complaint is being filed becase the contractors defrauded the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT out of money by not reporting the facts which point to an inside job according to 911 researchers?????

GIVE ME A BREAK!

That is the most twisted logic I have ever heard in my life.

If the complaint were being filed AGAINST the government by 911 researchers who claim that 911 was an inside job and the inspectors defrauded the American PEOPLE that would MAKE SENSE.

Excuse me, but the AMERICAN people have been and were defrauded when the US government and Military Industrial Complex killed thousands of innocent people on 911.

All branches of government were working in concert with one another to affect a STANDDOWN.

Can't think of the proper term at the moment.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-28-2007, 06:56 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case

Quote:
redrat11 wrote:
Yeah, it was a "inside job" alright, but not the people you 'think' are involved.

http://www.mitre.org/about/ffrdcs/c3i.html

Customers

The DOD C3I FFRDC supports a broad base of customers within the DOD and intelligence community, including:

Air Force
Army
Navy
Marine Corps
Defense Information Systems Agency
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Missile Defense Agency
Unified Commands
Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Office of the Secretary of Defense
Military Intelligence Agencies
Other Members of the National Security Community
To work hand-in-hand with our clients, MITRE staff members work at sites around the world.



http://www.mitre.org/about/ffrdcs/c3i.html
So, what are you saying, RedRat?

Can you sum it up for the readers, please?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 'Inside Job' Case CB_Brooklyn General Conspiracy Discussion 0 10-12-2007 11:52 PM
the case of johnny gosch General Conspiracy Discussion 5 09-13-2006 02:09 PM
Case for Christ Stranger Opinions 2 09-03-2006 09:40 PM
Digital fingerprint cracks the case igwt What is really going on? 1 10-24-2005 08:20 PM
Just another case of combat fatigue? freeman What is really going on? 1 08-15-2005 08:39 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.