To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Current mission: Distribute 1,000 copies of To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. torrent .ISO on DVD.
That's weird. I happened upon Jazzroc while looking for info on the subject. Was going to email him to invite him here to use REAL science. And he's here before I had a chance to. This must be a psychic event!
OH NO! I'm one of THEM now!
It didn't work like that.
My blog which runs at Wordpress gives me a "dashboard" which logs EVERY ENTRY EVENT.
I keep a beady eye upon it for entries from forums.
It was the simplest thing to reach into the blog page, Albie, and sign up.
I thought you were doing pretty well, actually, but I could also see a fairyland of trolling taking place.
I have nothing against conspiracy sites in principle (although quite often they have a lot against me!).
It's just that SOME conspiracy theories NEED quelling. If they are totally out of whack, they divert ENERGY from where it has to be applied.
The Chemtrail Theory plays every victim it has straight into the hands of the people we MUST overcome.
Even unaffected people are going to become affected by THAT.
The most important events are the ones happening now, of which we know nothing.
We know nothing because we have become fixated upon trivia like "chemtrails" (don't exist), 911 (far too effing late), and whatever....
Instead of quelling something that is extraordinarily plausible why don't you try working toward garnering support for whatever you feel is good and righteous? Surely your time could be better spent than making one-sided rants and attacks against people who have already expressed numerous reasons for their opinion. There must be something of a greater threat to the safety and security of you and your loved ones than "chemtrail believers". You do realize being rude is probably not the best way to convert people to your view, right? Are you really that bitter? Cheer up, mate. There's always viagra (though I would suggest Cayenne and Maca Root instead). :P (Couldn't resist!)
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Current mission: Distribute 1,000 copies of To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. torrent .ISO on DVD.
Instead of quelling something that is extraordinarily plausible
Conmen are that.
Quote:
why don't you try working toward garnering support for whatever you feel is good and righteous?
My understanding of aircraft and the atmosphere is "good and righteous". Because of it I KNOW your behavior is BAD and WRONGFUL.
Quote:
Surely your time could be better spent than making one-sided rants and attacks against people who have already expressed numerous reasons for their opinion.
Every one of your "reasons" is incorrect. In the three years since I first heard of this crap I have NEVER heard a chemtrailer propose a SINGLE correct "reason". You are NEVER right. Even stopped clocks are correct twice a day. "Chemtrail" reasoning is simply abysmal. Hopeless. Pathetic. Bad. Fraudulent. Corrupt.
Quote:
There must be something of a greater threat to the safety and security of you and your loved ones than "chemtrail believers".
What? Thousands of very stupid liars slandering innocent people while conspirators conspire at their leisure?
Quote:
You do realize being rude is probably not the best way to convert people to your view, right?
Well REASON doesn't seem to work with you. You make a mockery of debate with your arrogant pseudoscience.
Quote:
Are you really that bitter? Cheer up, mate. There's always viagra (though I would suggest Cayenne and Maca Root instead). :P (Couldn't resist!)
No. Not really. I'm confident you'll provide your own nemesis if you're determined enough. I won't have to bother. I've made you an offer, which you've rejected. That's the end of it.
I'm busy with this, on my desert island:
GFS Chemicals, Inc. maintains a proud tradition in these chemistries, particularly compounds derived from iodine. Our iodides, iodates, and periodates have established a worldwide reputation for high quality and high purity. These are used in everything from weather modification to organic catalysts to analytical chemistry
There doesn't seem much point in talking further, JazzRoc. You ignore my stated position and the reasons behind it, ridicule legitimate interpretations of science and discount eye-witness accounts. It's all just a lot of immature ranting and raving. I know you can see plainly that the spraying cannot be explained by ice saturation alone. Whether you choose to take the right side on this, defending the rights of the average person who want simple answers to legitimate questions, is your choice. Whether you choose to have a conversation with mutual respect would be your choice, too - but that really should have happened 10 posts ago, and I do not have much faith in your ability to take part in such. This is probably because your argument holds no water whatsoever. That is why you are reduced to personal attacks as the foundation of your conversation here.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Current mission: Distribute 1,000 copies of To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. torrent .ISO on DVD.
Last night it started to clear up a bit, but the thick overcast is back in full force today. After doing my rounds handing out DVDs (including to a few cute girls), I looked at rainwater under a dark-field microscope. I took a slide outside and waited about 5 minutes until it was covered with rain droplets. I put it under the microscope at magnification up to 16x60x (960x). I didn't see anything moving, but I did see a lot of very tiny possible fibers. I can't rule out slide contamination yet (it is practically impossible to get a slide 100% clean) and I do not have access to advanced techniques such as resonance scanning to identify the material nor far more advanced live microscopy up to 60,000x such as utilized by Royal Raymond Rife in the 30's to see very tiny organisms (that technology is, of course, harshly suppressed). To me, the fibers looked a lot smaller than normal dust contamination and it did not appear to be a uniform scrape or anything on the glass. The slide came straight from the box, to sampling, to the 'scope. A few of the supposed fibers were twisted up in close proximity, etc. Perhaps I can concentrate or strain the rainwater which should amplify their number and clearly rule out slide contamination.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Current mission: Distribute 1,000 copies of To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. torrent .ISO on DVD.
Last night it started to clear up a bit, but the thick overcast is back in full force today. After doing my rounds handing out DVDs (including to a few cute girls), I looked at rainwater under a dark-field microscope. I took a slide outside and waited about 5 minutes until it was covered with rain droplets. I put it under the microscope at magnification up to 16x60x (960x). I didn't see anything moving, but I did see a lot of very tiny possible fibers. I can't rule out slide contamination yet (it is practically impossible to get a slide 100% clean) and I do not have access to advanced techniques such as resonance scanning to identify the material nor far more advanced live microscopy up to 60,000x such as utilized by Royal Raymond Rife in the 30's to see very tiny organisms (that technology is, of course, harshly suppressed). To me, the fibers looked a lot smaller than normal dust contamination and it did not appear to be a uniform scrape or anything on the glass. The slide came straight from the box, to sampling, to the 'scope. A few of the supposed fibers were twisted up in close proximity, etc. Perhaps I can concentrate or strain the rainwater which should amplify their number and clearly rule out slide contamination.
Nice work TrutherD. Great scientific information!
I have some time to review more of this Chemtrail documents. I'm finding alot, if not all of the chemical talked about in the document are the same chemicals used in biological/chemical warfare.
__________________
God controls death. Hope He never takes it away.