Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > General Conspiracy Discussion
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-10-2008, 09:01 PM
CB_Brooklyn CB_Brooklyn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26
Default 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns


9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking uns





By CB_Brooklyn

September 2008


(mirrored on checktheevidence.com)




Seven years and the media still lies about 9/11. Disgraceful, isn’t it? A million leaflets, dozens of films, but continued silence. Why is this happening? Why hasn’t the truth movement’s work broken through the media’s lies? The answer relates to the material the “truth movement” promotes.


Vladimir Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." A look through the “Global Analysis - International Intelligence” archives reveal many comparisons between Lenin and Bush.


Those in control of the world have top-secret exotic technologies. These technologies could replace oil and gas, but instead have been weaponized. 9/11 was orchestrated with these technologies. They plan a police state culture and don’t mind if a limited number of people are exposed to the 9/11 propaganda, as long as the advanced technologies remain secret. See “The 9/11 Truth Movement, Free Energy Suppression and the Global Elite’s Agenda” for full information.


Who controls the horizontal? Who controls the vertical? We know the corporate media to be our culture’s main source of news. Unfortunately though, our trustworthy media is completely controlled. Observe the graph below (sourced here) and note all this happened in just 20 years time. This chart details the corporations involved.








Did you know the Washington Post owns Newsweek? Or that the New York Times owns the Boston Globe? Believe it or not, getting the news “changed” to suit one’s preference isn’t that difficult. As this Saudi Prince and Rupert Murdoch know, all it requires is shares of a news agency and the owner’s phone number!



Not only do the media censor information, they’re a propaganda-promotion tool:


This March 2000 WorldNetDaily article gives some info on this. Note this quote: “…"psyops" (psychological operations) personnel, soldiers and officers, have worked in the CNN headquarters in Atlanta.” Why on earth would “PSYOPS soldiers” work at CNN? What possible purpose could they serve?


This April 2006 Washington Post article concerning the Iraq war reveals something too: “The documents explicitly list the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign.” Courtesy of the CNN PSYOPS Soldiers??


This June 2008 Washington Times article details Congress’ attempt to “ban Pentagon propaganda on the Iraq war”. What kind of system is this if Congress needs to create a bill to ban propaganda?


Tom Curley, President and CEO of the Associated Press, voiced his opinion: “9/11 attacks harm First Amendment”.



The perpetrators who orchestrated 9/11 are using these media-propaganda techniques to control the opposition.

The “truth movement” is the opposition.



Let’s start by sorting through some of the planted propaganda. Then we’ll examine the smoking gun evidence of exotic weapons, including a timeline of 9/11 events relevant to the technologies used. Following the timeline are some personal statements about a couple of individuals in the “truth movement”. In the final section, we’ll examine two non-9/11 “conspiracy theories”. These should help open up the mind to exotic weaponry should the reader still consider it science fiction. (Warning: The last section contains potentially upsetting material, and will permanently alter the average person’s perception of reality.)




* Lenin-inspired Propaganda *


Let’s look at four examples of this propaganda and how the media promote it. The reader will note that “prominent figures” within the “truth movement” who support the propaganda have affiliations with exotic weaponry and the Global Elite. See the “Global Elite Agenda” article (linked above) for a list of people who lost their lives as part of the cover-up.



Continued...
CheckTheEvidence.com - 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-10-2008, 09:27 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns

What are examples of exotic weaponry and how would this weaponry replace oil and gas?

Granted, they are in possession of "advanced technology" and secret/silent/invisible weaponry, but if one is to to claim the above, I think ONE should explain so that it does not appear to be propaganda.

As I told RedRat, if he is going to post a youtube video with a title about Obama that is a LIE, he falls within the category of those he supposedly detests. Those who spread lies and not the truth.

The media who are the mouthpiece for our corrupt politicians.

And, yes.

Corporate conglomerates are the way in which they control all that they control whether it be media or not.

Just my two cents!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-11-2008, 05:18 PM
CB_Brooklyn CB_Brooklyn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26
Default Re: 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns

Alaskan magnetometers went BONKERS with every 9/11 "event", including the planes-shaped holes appearing in the towers. HAARP was involved.

No one in New York reported the deafening sound of wide-body commercial airliners hitting the towers at full throttle.

In 1999, the Washington Post reported on the military's psychological operation hologram project.

See here for source information for everything in this comment:

9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns
CheckTheEvidence.com - 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-11-2008, 05:23 PM
CB_Brooklyn CB_Brooklyn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26
Default Re: 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns

BlueAngel, check out 9/11 Truth Movement, Free Energy Suppression and the Global Elite's Agenda for some examples of "free" energy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-11-2008, 06:40 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns

Quote:
Originally Posted by CB_Brooklyn View Post
Alaskan magnetometers went BONKERS with every 9/11 "event", including the planes-shaped holes appearing in the towers. HAARP was involved.

Can you please explain what Alaskan magnetometers going bonkers indicates?

Could you please explain what HAARP is and how it was involved?


No one in New York reported the deafening sound of wide-body commercial airliners hitting the towers at full throttle.

Really? So, what about the pictures of the planes slamming into the buildings?

In 1999, the Washington Post reported on the military's psychological operation hologram project.

Could you please summarize briefly what the hologram project is?

See here for source information for everything in this comment:

9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns
CheckTheEvidence.com - 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns
Obviously, this site doesn't like it when you don't reply underneath the quote.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-11-2008, 06:49 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns

Quote:
Originally Posted by CB_Brooklyn View Post
BlueAngel, check out 9/11 Truth Movement, Free Energy Suppression and the Global Elite's Agenda for some examples of "free" energy.
WE have discussed free energy here on this site, but not exotic weaponry that can replace oil and gas.

I'm with you on the 911 conspiracy, but I disapprove of information being circulated by disinformation agents that winds up in the hands of 911 truth seekers, who, due to their sincere interest in exposing the government and their involvement in 911, believe unverifiable facts that the DA's post on the Internet and they, in turn, pass this information along.

This MO seeks to make the 911 conspiracy theorists appear to be BONKERS like the Alaskan whatever they are.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-12-2008, 09:05 AM
theonewillcome theonewillcome is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 79
Default Re: 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=550 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD align=middle>Some information that gives sway to the belief of an inside job.

The Unspeakable Truth of 9/11

</TD></TR><TR><TD>
by P.A. Buchanan – September 11, 2008

or the 'dots' you are not supposed to connect...

The following is a compilation from mainstream media reports and other investigative research available on the web. (see also Paul Thompson, The Terror Timeline, 2004) Most of it never again repeated, clues, 'dots' never connected:

- The World Trade Center needed repair since the late 1980s, some $200 million in renovations and improvements, mostly related to removal and/or replacement of building materials declared health hazards since the Towers were built. The WTC was labeled an "asbestos bombshell". In fact, the Port Authority thought of the WTC as a dinosaur, trying several times to get permits to demolish the buildings for liability reasons. The PA was turned down. The asbestos problem was no secret. The sole reason the complex was still up on 9/11/2001 was the cost of taking the Twin Towers down floor by floor. (www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut?pid=173207)

- Larry Silverstein, a New York property tycoon purchased a 99-year lease for the entire WTC complex just 6 months prior to the 9/11 attacks. That was the first time in its 33-year history the complex had ever changed ownership. Mr. Silverstein, who must have known about the asbestos problem, made a down-payment of $124 million on this $3.2 billion complex, and promptly insured it for $3.6 billion. He also covered the complex against "terrorist attacks". In the contract Mr. Silverstein was also specifically given the right to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed. Mr. Silverstein's first order of business as the new owner was to change the company responsible for the security of the complex. The new security company he hired was Securacom (now Stratasec). George W. Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, was on its board of directors, and Marvin's cousin, Wirt Walker III, was its CEO. According to public records, not only did Securacom provide electronic security for the World Trade Center, it also covered Dulles International Airport and United Airlines - two key players in the 9/11 attacks. Following the attacks, Mr. Silverstein filed two insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy ($7.2B), based on the two -- in Mr. Silverstein's view -- separate attacks. The insurance company, Swiss Re, paid Mr. Silverstein $4.6 Billion, still a princely return on a relatively paltry investment of $124 million. Incidentally, it's worth noting that one of Mr. Silverstein's closest friends, a person with whom it's said he speaks almost daily by phone, is none other than former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It was also Mr. Netanyahu, who back in 1986 coined the phrase The War on Terror… (www.informationliberation.com/index.php?id=15459)

- Back in October 2000, about 11 months prior to September 11, 2001, a former Israeli Defense Force member and veteran of the 1973 Yom Kippur War overheard a conversation in Hebrew in New Jersey, "The Americans will learn what it is to live with terrorists after the planes hit the twins in September... The Arabs are so stupid. They don't even imagine that we are using them." (www.muckrakerreport.com/id387.html)

- On 9/11 at least two Israel-based employees of the instant messaging service Odigo received warnings of an imminent attack in New York City more than two hours before the first plane hit the buildings. Odigo had its U.S. headquarters two blocks from the WTC. The Odigo employees, however, did not pass the warning on to the authorities in New York City. (Washington Post, 9/27/01) Odigo, like many Israeli software companies, is based and has its Research and Development center in Herzliya, the small town north of Tel Aviv, which happens to be where the headquarters of Mossad, Israel's intelligence service are located.

- Also on 9/11/2001 five "Middle Eastern men" were arrested in New Jersey by the FBI after having been seen on a roof top videotaping and celebrating the explosive collapses of the WTC. "It looked like they knew what was going to happen." (Bergen Record, 9/12/01) It was later confirmed that the five detained men were in fact agents of the Israeli military intelligence, Mossad. Their "moving van" from a Weehawken, N.J. company called Urban Moving Systems tested positive for explosives. Another employee of Urban Moving Systems, reported that the majority of his co-workers were Israelis and were joking on the day of the attacks. The employee said, 'I was in tears, and these guys were joking, and that bothered me.' These guys (Israelis) were like, "Now America knows what we go through." (www.whatreallyhappened.com/sears.html)

Dominic Suter, the Israeli owner of Urban Moving Systems, fled in haste after 9/11/2001, or was allowed to escape, to Israel before FBI agents could interrogate him. (Forward, 3/15/02)

The arrested five Israelis were released after spending just 71 days in U.S. custody. The Assistant Attorney General in charge of criminal investigations at the time was Michael Chertoff, the current head of the Dept. of Homeland Security. Chertoff, the son of Israel's first Mossad agents, facilitated the 9-11 cover-up, is thought to be a dual national. (www.whatreallyhappened.com/sears.html)

One of the released Israeli agents later told Israeli radio that they had been sent to "document the event"...
(ABC News, 6/1/02)

- Carl Cameron of Fox News wrote an extensive 4-part report about Urban Moving Systems and the five Israelis. While it is no longer available at the Fox site, it has been saved in various archives on the web. (www.antiwar.com/justin/pf/p-j062402.html)

He was also told by an unnamed US official "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

- Senator Bob Graham (D-FL) was quoted saying: "I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing - although that was part of it - by a sovereign government… It will become public at some point when it's turned over to the archives, but that's 20 or 30 years from now."
( www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?entity=bob_graham)

- Investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to 'pursue or even suggest Israeli spying... is considered career suicide'... (Fox News, 12/12/01)

- Another FBI official said to Cameron: "While I agree with you, if I say anything about US geopolitical interests with Israel, I might as well clean off my desk." Indeed, Carl Cameron of Fox News, himself is no longer willing to address the issue, comment or even acknowledge anything about his own research into the subject...

As to Osama bin Laden's so-called 'confession video', Hani Sebai, a British electronics specialist talking to the BBC, called it 'a clear fabrication, a classic cut-and-paste job ' using an Osama wedding video. In an in-person interview given to the Pakistani paper Umat that was also broadcast on BBC, bin Laden denied any involvement in the 9/11 attacks. There would indeed be little incentive for someone to disavow a deed of this magnitude, for which he would be praised, to which he is supposedly dedicated to carrying through. (Ralph Schoenmann,Taking Aim, 7/12/2005)

The official investigation under the control of the neocon Philip Zelikow thwarted any attempt at discovering the truth behind the attacks. Any questioning of the official narrative, be it by victim relatives, architects, engineers, physicists or other patriotic Americans can simply be silenced as crazy 'conspiracy theory'.
(www.911truth.org, patriotsquestion911.com, www.ae911truth.org)

The implication of the Arabs in the 9/11 attacks with the full support of the Zionist-controlled mass media gave the Israelis the perfect opportunity to sear the image of the 'Arab terrorist' onto the American psyche.

Former Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was asked a day later what the attacks in New York and Washington would mean for US-Israeli relations. He said, "It's very good". Then he corrected himself, adding: "Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy for Israel from Americans"… (New York Times, 9/12/01)

"From national networks to small-town newspapers, the view that America's terrible taste of terrorism will finally do away with even modest calls for the restraint of Israeli military attacks on Palestinian towns has become an instant, unshakable axiom… Now, support for Israel in America is officially absolute…" (Village Voice, 9/19/01)

Whether Israel and its allies here just allowed it to happen or were involved in the planning and execution, their motive was correctly identified by Neil Mackay in the Nov. 2, 2003 issue of the Scottish 'Sunday Herald':

"to bind America in blood and mutual suffering to the Israeli cause ".

That's exactly why you won't see these connections in the mainstream media, this is the truth that is really unspeakable...

(Note: Being critical of Israel is not anti-semitic or even anti-jewish, see www.jewsnotzionists.org, many traditional Jews view Zionism as antithetic to true Torah Judaism)

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-12-2008, 11:01 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: 9/11: Distinguishing The Propaganda From The Smoking Guns

Information that is not verifiable, but written as fact by the DA's on the Internet is passed along by their foot soldiers on sites such as CC.

It's interesting to me how when you directly ask someone who posts as fact that the controllers have exotic weaponry that can replace oil and gas, what exotic weaponry and how can it replace oil and gas, you are told to read the information contained in the link provided.

Ah, jeez, couldn't they just sum it up in a paragraph or two?

I mean, we all don't have time to read every link posted on this site.

Do I have to click another link?

Why not attempt COMMUNICATION?

If they are certain, without a doubt, as to what they post, why not just answer the question instead of referring us to another link written by another person on the internet who claims this and that and whom we don't know from a hole in the ground?

The same with Freedom Fighter.

Asked him what messages are in the water and, again, I'm referred to his site.

Certainly, a paragraph or two could explain it.

They're just passing along information that they either believe is true, but can't put into words what they claim and, therefore, refer us to a link/site or because they're here passing along disinformation from DA's that they have posted on the net.

Dropping bombs.

Hit and run, as I said.

Last edited by BlueAngel : 09-12-2008 at 11:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.