Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > Opinions
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-30-2008, 12:30 PM
Slork Slork is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Emma Smith View Post
The MPAA (motion picture association of america) was the authority that banned the poster.

Yeah, it does seem a bit hypocritical if they were actually the ones that banned it.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-30-2008, 12:46 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

What I meant was that if the MPAA banned the poster, what entity has control over movie titles?

Surely, someone does.

If it is the MPAA, their banning of the poster is hypocritical, but most likely a move to try to make them look like the puritans that they are not.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-30-2008, 07:29 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

That's funny.

Utah.

A mormon state, bans Zack and Miri.

'Zack and Miri' Banned in Utah
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-30-2008, 08:08 PM
justgroovy's Avatar
justgroovy justgroovy is offline
workin' for the man
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Northern Bay
Posts: 251
Send a message via AIM to justgroovy
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Well I'm going to see it tomorrow (good thing I don't live in Utah), I'll let you know how it is Blue, or I won't if you'd rather not know.

And stay away from Clerks II I have a feeling you'd really really hate that movie.
__________________
You can't take the sky from me.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-30-2008, 08:22 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by justgroovy View Post
Well I'm going to see it tomorrow (good thing I don't live in Utah), I'll let you know how it is Blue, or I won't if you'd rather not know.

And stay away from Clerks II I have a feeling you'd really really hate that movie.
Thanks for the heads up about Clerks II.

I think being a prisoner of MKULTRA/Project Monarch and the sexual abuse I endured; together with my knowledge as to their agenda for society and the filth they target at our youth, just makes my stomach turn when sexually explicit material is shown in movies.

Like that scene in "Something about Mary," with Stiler in the bathroom.

I mean, I just can't watch certain movies with my kids.

The sexual content is just too graphic so much of the time.

It might be that I'm just oversensitized; could be I'm a prude or like I said, merely because I understand their agenda.

Lemme know what you think.

Enjoy!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-31-2008, 02:54 PM
Leonardo Leonardo is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 498
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emma Smith View Post
Okay, censorship in the US<st1:country-region><st1></st1></st1:country-region> must be at an all time high. Anyone going to see Zack and Miri Make A Porno on October 31?<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDo***ent> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDo***ent> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object> <style> st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--><style> <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]--> <o></o>

I saw an advanced screening and thought it was pretty damn funny. Probably Smith's best in awhile. Anyway, I'm sure you've all heard about the poster being banned in the <st1:country-region><st1>States</st1></st1:country-region> which is totally retarded. Here it is:
<o></o>

<o></o>
So is this just a reflection of Puritan mania ala Bush government? Or has it always been this way? Will Obama (if he wins) change the way censorship is utilized? Is the word "porno" really that bad???
The denotative meaning of porno is accurate enough, even if 'porno' is a slang term for two people fucking on camera. But in Monarch, 'porno' is important to affect the desired 'butterfly effect'. People are conditioned to 'porno', so they will watch the word 'porno' wherever it is. Yes, WORDS are everything. The world is controlled by WORDS. WORDS are mental power. And the Illuminati controls the world through psycho-spiritual FORCE of LOGOS. Remember that. Also remember the universe was created by the LOGOS. LOGOS is all powerful to Create or Destroy. In short it is the FORCE. You probably don't understand this because you're dumb and ignorant, Emma. But just read what I've written below and see if it doesn't make sense. The word PORNO really is that bad.

Actually sounds like another case of the Hegelian Dialectic (the devil's game, a Dialectician) at work.

You first must make a Thesis ridiculous however for it for work. So, thus we have Puritanism, an extremely false, legalistic form of Protestant Biblicism, which is actually a modern myth inflated by atheists, satanists, wiccans, or whoever needs an angle to attack 'Judeo-Christianity' will cry 'Puritanism' alot like you're doing right now. Madonna used it successfully so that she could dance around like a little blonde whore and make a ton of money off of a really shallow, talentless musical career. Madonna is using Beelzebub type of magick. The Illuminati use the magick of the Lord of the Flies to create a "Shit Buzz", as we call it. If you want to attrack all the flies and maggots and what not of the world, you first need a big pile of Horse Shit or something like it. A Shit Buzz is good for stirring up the masses. That is why you'll often hear us say things like, The Illuminati are great Shit Stirers. That is actually what they are brewing in their cauldron. The Illuminati need Shit to survive. They feed off of and gain wealth through SHIT BUZZ tactics.

Next, you use such a ridiculous standard to establish the laws, bylaws of a country, even bluelaws, and many of you are well aquanted with the blue laws. Those are laws made by women that actually don't exist but are simply assumed in polite society until a woman wants to use one of them against a man and a woman is the only member of humanity that can successfully use and manipulate bluelaws, except for a politician of course.

Then what you do is create 'liberalism'. And you make 'liberalism' seem 'logical'. You bolster it with false logic, false science, false education, false entertainment, xyz. BUT, and this is important, you must make your liberalism very very VERY close to the actually truth of the matter for it to be adequately effective for deceiving and programing the masses. This way, people will get so tired of the Thesis (Puritanism) that they will in time become conditioned to the Antithesis (Liberalism, SATANISM), and thus will establish a Sinthesis after a few hundred years or so, if your lucky, and you live in a closed universe where you don't have an all powerful God with a sense of humor leading a dislexic named Fra N. into a course of metaphysical training wherein he will break the omega code or something along those lines.

So, yes, its an example of how you could use the Hegelian Dialectic like a magician's trick to slowly condition the masses to accept PORN as the norm and keep them mystically and metaphysically enslaved to the Whore of Babalon and in time Create a Satanic World Empire, if you were one who wanted to pull off such a distraction.

Truth of the matter is, Biblically speaking, pretty much anything goes sexually as long as its holistic, loving and in a state of mariage. A man can lick hers and she can suck his, in fact, if I'm reading Solomon right in the Hebrew, I don't really know of an orafice that is off limits between a man and woman who are married. So, really, if people knew the Bible they would understand that they've been robbing themselves blind by jacking off to porno on the internet all this time to women who don't even exist while they could have been doing all that an more themselves had they gotten maried.

People are stupid, what can I say. But you have to understand that the Illuminati control the airwaves right now, and people believe all that buzz and especially women. Women always 'believe' the most common denominator. If 'most people' are 'believing' or 'doing' are 'saying something' a woman will almost always buy into it. Like you are right now with Puritanism. Satan was the first one who created a Shit Buzz for a woman. Notice that Satan did not tempt the man to eat the forbidden fruit, but the dumb woman, Eve. So women are great tools of Satan and the Illuminati to make noise and create the auraole of an even bigger SHIT BUZZ. Satan did it through the destructive and negative power of LOGOS, and so the Illuminati does today. But it takes millions of stupid, whoreish, worthless, ignorant, duped women to make it happen, women a lot like you.

Thank you.

--Fra N.

P.S. Sticks and Stones can break your bones, but Words can break your soul. Remember.

Last edited by Leonardo : 10-31-2008 at 03:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-31-2008, 03:31 PM
justgroovy's Avatar
justgroovy justgroovy is offline
workin' for the man
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Northern Bay
Posts: 251
Send a message via AIM to justgroovy
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Oh and by the way . . .

Emma is cheating on us!
__________________
You can't take the sky from me.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-31-2008, 06:19 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by justgroovy View Post
Oh and by the way . . .

Emma is cheating on us!
I feel so, so, so USED!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-01-2008, 10:25 AM
Leonardo Leonardo is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 498
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

I already have my own personal theory as to who and what our precious 'Emma' is.

A real bber would have been on my post like a rat on a cheeto. But no, 'Emma' seems to be aloft in the sundry quite a bit and makes her 'circuit' here only once in a while.

However, she does bring up a good social programming issue.

Here's what I see for the future of PORNO PROGRAMMING.

First it was just smut mags, snuff films, and VHS tapes.

Then the advent of cable porn flics.

Next came the great advent of internet porn.

So here's what I figure, they've been trying to warp everyone into sexual deviancy for quite a while now. They've made a ton of money, but that just isn't good enough. Now they are trying to get everyone to 'make' porn in they're own pig pen.

I think I get it. I am supposed to take my 'girlfriend' to see this 'Romantic Comedy', and then like monkey see monkey do, we giggle and giggle and giggle and get really horny and say to one another, Hey 'Mari', why don't WE make a PORNO too and post it on youtube, huh huh, hee hee, har har! Won't that be 'FUN', won't that be 'FUNNY' "PORNO' = 'FUNNY'. 'PORNO' = 'ROMANTIC'. 'PORNO' = 'MONEY'.

Here is an example of illuminati social programming 101.


P.S. Dear 'Emma', is the word Dumb or Ignorant really that bad?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-01-2008, 10:26 AM
justgroovy's Avatar
justgroovy justgroovy is offline
workin' for the man
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Northern Bay
Posts: 251
Send a message via AIM to justgroovy
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Yeah Emma has broke our hearts BUT to his credit at least Emma comes back and pretends to be interested in us. Most site pimpers don't even do that.

I can't wait to see what movie MOVIETRAILERLIVE.COM has in store for us.

Any ideas Emma?
__________________
You can't take the sky from me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.