Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > Opinions
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-03-2008, 11:47 AM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?


I am totally and completely disgusted with you JustGroovy for enjoying this movie.

I think you should feel exactly the same way I do!



In all seriousness.

Glad you liked it.

Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-07-2008, 08:18 PM
Mr.NAFTA Mr.NAFTA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Well I don't think the word "porno" is bad, considering I google it at least 10 times a day :P. seriously though no the word is not bad, after all what is a word but a vocalization, and no you can not say a word is bad because of it's denotative meaning, as the denotative meaning of words change greatly over time. so you can say what is bad is the connocative meaning people associate with the word. of course people like blue who have been abuse will have a different connotative meaning of porno, so will some christians, and people who represent other "morality based organizations". So to me no Zack and Miri make a porno isn't a bad title, actually it's not a title at all, it's basically just the exact description of the movie. Personally I think it's worse to edit it and not let people know what they are seeing. What if some couple just sees the picture and think it's a romantic clean cut comedy by the title of Zack and Miri, and have no idea it's a raunchy seth and smith master piece the likes of which many of us know and love. Put porno so anyone who is offended can stay away from not just reading it BUT WATCHING IT. Or how about P-OR-NO, then it's more like a question if you have to use the rest room or not P? or no?. BTW i'm thinking of emailing my buddy smith and saying i got the script for Zack and Miri make a Gothic/Nazi/Satanic/Triple Anal Princess/Two D1ck and a Dildo/Midget on Horseback/Musical-Action-War time Drama-Horror for the NWO movie Staring Jude Law as Seth Rogan.....hmmm can we say BlockBuster...........of course it will be IMAX only pffft expect anything less than porno in 3D?.........point of that last rambling, ya it could of been much worse than just porno, not exactly pushing the bar in my opinion. Plus, it's just a good movie haha.

Last edited by Mr.NAFTA : 11-07-2008 at 08:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-08-2008, 07:59 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.NAFTA View Post
Well I don't think the word "porno" is bad, considering I google it at least 10 times a day :P. seriously though no the word is not bad, after all what is a word but a vocalization, and no you can not say a word is bad because of it's denotative meaning, as the denotative meaning of words change greatly over time. so you can say what is bad is the connocative meaning people associate with the word. of course people like blue who have been abuse will have a different connotative meaning of porno, so will some christians, and people who represent other "morality based organizations". So to me no Zack and Miri make a porno isn't a bad title, actually it's not a title at all, it's basically just the exact description of the movie. Personally I think it's worse to edit it and not let people know what they are seeing. What if some couple just sees the picture and think it's a romantic clean cut comedy by the title of Zack and Miri, and have no idea it's a raunchy seth and smith master piece the likes of which many of us know and love. Put porno so anyone who is offended can stay away from not just reading it BUT WATCHING IT. Or how about P-OR-NO, then it's more like a question if you have to use the rest room or not P? or no?. BTW i'm thinking of emailing my buddy smith and saying i got the script for Zack and Miri make a Gothic/Nazi/Satanic/Triple Anal Princess/Two D1ck and a Dildo/Midget on Horseback/Musical-Action-War time Drama-Horror for the NWO movie Staring Jude Law as Seth Rogan.....hmmm can we say BlockBuster...........of course it will be IMAX only pffft expect anything less than porno in 3D?.........point of that last rambling, ya it could of been much worse than just porno, not exactly pushing the bar in my opinion. Plus, it's just a good movie haha.
There isn't a different meaning of the word pornography.

Pornography is pornography and nothing else.

I know what their agenda is regarding our youth when exposing them consistently to sexual content in movies, television, music, etc.

This is the reason I deplore movies that are aimed at our youth and desensitize them to sex.

Sex becomes love and love becomes sex and this creates the breakdown of the family unit which is the core and the fabric of our society, but has been dismantled by the controllers in this regard.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-08-2008, 09:10 PM
Mr.NAFTA Mr.NAFTA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Well hell, who wants to wait to get married and have a family to have sex? So movies like this lead to more young naive women with low self esteem and a daddy complex who are willing to do anything twice. Can't say I have not reaped the rewards of this agenda desensitization of our sexual inhibitions. All i'm saying is if Kevin Smith is actually secretly helping me get laid through his films, well I got to buy that man a drink. Of course there are different meanings of the word "pornography", is it just nudity? some would say, others would say that can be art, is it two or more people naked together? sexual discriptions? implied penetration? visible penetration? wait Lets google it...."anything that is created to cause sexual excitement or arousel"....so women are your underwear? yes it's pornography, it was created not for support but to cause men's sexual excitement. oh wait are we going to ban victoria secrets?, btw if a someone makes a porno for educational purposes and not to sexually excite or arouse people does that no longer make it pornography? how about if the actors in a porno are extremely ugly and no one was excited, or infact it actually was made to disgust people and turn them away from having any sexual excitement, now that might be a new industry. a company that makes movies with heavy sexual content that is designed to be disgusting would still be pornography by some, but not by all. So in the end the definition is based upon the given "intent". Now I can argue that Blue comes on here to talk in detail about her mindcontrol springstein orgies with the soul purpose to sexual excite various members in the hopes of them privately messaging her, so she can cyber mind control webcam screw these lonely bastards while her husband video tapes the whole thing for their private website, which of course they use to supplement their income. Now Blue if your story gave even one member a chubby while they thought about springstein gimp ball gagging you and donkey punching you in the back of the head while singing Born in the USA, are you a Smut peddler? are you only at fault if you profit from it? is free porn still porn? was your intention to inform or to arouse? maybe you should look at yourself before you hate on good o'l kevin smith.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-08-2008, 09:26 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.NAFTA View Post
Now I can argue that Blue comes on here to talk in detail about her mindcontrol springstein orgies with the soul purpose to sexual excite various members in the hopes of them privately messaging her, so she can cyber mind control webcam screw these lonely bastards while her husband video tapes the whole thing for their private website, which of course they use to supplement their income. Now Blue if your story gave even one member a chubby while they thought about springstein gimp ball gagging you and donkey punching you in the back of the head while singing Born in the USA, are you a Smut peddler? are you only at fault if you profit from it? is free porn still porn? was your intention to inform or to arouse? maybe you should look at yourself before you hate on good o'l kevin smith.
I seriously doubt most people who know about mind control and the traumatization that the victims experienced and, even those who don't, but read my thread, would argue that what I write about my victimization is in the hopes of giving another member a chubby so that they PM me.

You're one sick bastard!

But, you've made that evident.

Like you said, you google pornography about 100 times a day.

So, it's understandable that when I write about sexual abuse, you believe it is to sexaully arouse others.

You sound like ONE OF THEM.

A sadistic pig!

Springsteen would be one of the SMUT peddlars, NOT I.

I've been faithfully married for 26 year and I have no desire to elicit a sexual encounter with anyone other than my husband.

Last edited by BlueAngel : 11-08-2008 at 09:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-08-2008, 09:56 PM
Mr.NAFTA Mr.NAFTA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

I was simply playing the devil's advocate to your statement about "There isn't a different meaning of the word pornography." I take that stance that it is open to Interpretation. People have the right to express themselves. You express publically events that happened to you in your life. Well some of those events are sexually explict, which can be defined as pornography by some. Just the same as when retired pornstars write their biographies, which of course is going to contain sexual material, and are then labeled pornographic by religious groups of walmart bans the sell of the book. No where is any definition did it say pornography was defined by if the people did it for money or mindcontrol. You want it both ways, but guess what, if you do it and you talk about it, then your guilty of it.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-08-2008, 10:04 PM
Mr.NAFTA Mr.NAFTA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

"I seriously doubt most people who know about mind control and the traumatization that the victims experienced and, even those who don't, but read my thread, would argue that what I write about my victimization is in the hopes of giving another member a chubby so that they PM me."

Oh so you doubt that sicko people who are into incest don't read incest stories, or join incest survivor groups so that they can get off on the stories of victims. Don't be naive. Oh wait you know this? well then how do you know Bruce isn't tracking you and reading all your posts loving every torrid detail of it, sitting behind his computer on tour remembering the good o'l days? You can't rule that out can you? Can't rule out that Cathy O'Brien's book was picked up by Hilary and she got off on reading out how she was forced to muff dive on her. Just like a serial killer who takes a trophy to relive his kills, everytime you make a post there is the possibility that one of your handlers is using it to get his jollies off. So by many definitions, you are a smut peddler.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-08-2008, 10:05 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.NAFTA View Post
I was simply playing the devil's advocate to your statement about "There isn't a different meaning of the word pornography." I take that stance that it is open to Interpretation. People have the right to express themselves. You express publically events that happened to you in your life. Well some of those events are sexually explict, which can be defined as pornography by some. Just the same as when retired pornstars write their biographies, which of course is going to contain sexual material, and are then labeled pornographic by religious groups of walmart bans the sell of the book. No where is any definition did it say pornography was defined by if the people did it for money or mindcontrol. You want it both ways, but guess what, if you do it and you talk about it, then your guilty of it.
Sorry, but pornography is pornography and there is only definition for same. It's not open to interpretation.

Those who partake in such of their own free will are porn stars.

Being a victim of sexual abuse in a mind control program and used in Mafia/CIA pornography when a child against my own free will and writing about it, isn't pornography, pal.

It's a CRIME!

If you or anyone else infers the same to be pornography, you are one SICK PUPPY!

It's about sexual deviants who abuse children, pal.

That isn't pornography.

It's a crime!

Last edited by BlueAngel : 11-08-2008 at 10:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-08-2008, 11:08 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.NAFTA View Post
"I seriously doubt most people who know about mind control and the traumatization that the victims experienced and, even those who don't, but read my thread, would argue that what I write about my victimization is in the hopes of giving another member a chubby so that they PM me."

Oh so you doubt that sicko people who are into incest don't read incest stories, or join incest survivor groups so that they can get off on the stories of victims. Don't be naive. Oh wait you know this? well then how do you know Bruce isn't tracking you and reading all your posts loving every torrid detail of it, sitting behind his computer on tour remembering the good o'l days? You can't rule that out can you? Can't rule out that Cathy O'Brien's book was picked up by Hilary and she got off on reading out how she was forced to muff dive on her. Just like a serial killer who takes a trophy to relive his kills, everytime you make a post there is the possibility that one of your handlers is using it to get his jollies off. So by many definitions, you are a smut peddler.
I said most people don't read the mind control within the music industry thread and interpret it as pornography.

I would be referring to normal people and not the minority of sickos, like yourself.

I don't know if Springsteen is tracking me or reading these posts and quite frankly I could care less if he is or if he's getting off on it and thinks about them as the good ole' days.

If he does, only proves he's as sick as I've written.

I don't have handlers, pal, and I'm not peddling anything.

I'm writing about criminal activities perpetrated against me and thousands of other children and the SMUT who are responsible for same.

Last edited by BlueAngel : 11-08-2008 at 11:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-08-2008, 11:14 PM
Mr.NAFTA Mr.NAFTA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Default Re: Is the word porno really that bad?

First off, my names not pal, and i'm in no way your pal. Many children are not paid to be in "child pornography" but it's still pornography, so what your saying pornography is only present when someone is paid and then they are considered a pornstar if they do it willingly for money? Yeah your logic has more holes than swiss cheese. Pornography isn't about free will. Most of it is made against people's will or wishes. It's still pornography. It can be mindcontrol, or financial control, either way they are being manipulated and controlled. What you are writing is pornographic material, you can say it's a crime. The only thing criminal about it is that you constantly post it publicly where others read it. Yes if it's a crime you would get off your ass and do something about it. Oh wait you can't right? because you've been married to your husband for 26 years, so i'm guessing your last abuse was at least that long ago, and since they didn't murder you, well you probably let the statue of limitations run out so even if you have any proof it's useless. Well you know what is criminal that you didn't get off your ass and do more to help those children still involved in the program and spend your time on here arguing with me about kevin smith films. Wow your a real proactive victim/survivor arn't you? If you have knowledge of a crime and evidence and don't come forward your apart of that crime, your just as guilty, your apart of covering it up. Every person who was abused after you, every person who could of been helped, ever person who hasn't recovered from their mindcontrol like you were able to is being victimized and you do what to help them? What are you doing to help them? Posting on here where nothing will ever get done about the problem. Your the sicko, look in the mirror, i'm not the one who was abused and let my abuser go on abusing others so I can sit at home with my family on my computer enjoying my life while others suffer. You got out, you have a responsiblity, and yet you just spend your energy mouthing off to me? You are not a child anymore, your a damn adult, your not a victim anymore your a survivor, your not a slave anymore your free, yet what do you do to help those still being victimize, what are you doing to free those who are still enslaved, what do you do to help those who are still children? Stop ignoring your resposiblities by babbling on about kevin smith to me. You have evidence your keeping, won't give us, pictures you hiding from us, names your still holding back, lady the only crime being commited here is by you. There crimes against you are long passed, but everyday you cover this up your the commiting the crime.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.