The 911 Coincidence Guide

[Jimbo]

"Star Wars" Parallels w/ The Evil Empire :-o :-o :-o

Star Wars - Fact Not Fiction - by JAH
http://i.am/jah/starwar.htm

The Way Home Or Face The Fire
http://jahtruth.net//wayintro.htm (Introduction)
http://jahtruth.net//twh.pdf (Book in PDF Format)

8-)

[Jimbo]

More 911 Video Evidence – :-o :-o :-o


WTC 2nd Tower Hit

CBC 911 Video Secrets Revealed
http://www.rense.com/general65/911b.htm

8-)

[Jimbo]

911 Pod Missile Theory – :-o :-o :-o

truebeliever, as far as the “pod missile theory” you can look at the following video clip.

Go into the link http://www.letsroll911.org & then scroll down into the page to about 45% or so, right next to the DVD add for “Painful Questions”. The clip has a “Letsroll911.org” signature at the bottom right. This is a “slow motion” angle of the missile firing right before impact. Also the previous to video clips show the same scenario from 2 other differing angles.

NOTE: I’m just exposing these documented perspectives here & don’t necessarily agree or disagree w/ the views presented.

8-)

[truebeliever]

CBC 911 Video Secrets Revealed
http://www.rense.com/general65/911b.htm

I note that the 3 photo's supposedly showing the "explosion" that proves there was explosives on the plane is grossly over exposed. The initial burst out of the building is dull red from the start...but very white in these exposures.

Also...the little plumes? Is he saying that is part of the explosives aboard the aircraft? They are more likely explosives already placed their or more likely simply "blown out" windows...a rather large aircraft has just ploughed into it.

As for it being a 737...may well be.

Did'nt a news reporter state in a interview that day that he saw it had NO windows?

The engine size looks right for a 737.

[Jimbo]

911 Pod Missile Theory – :-o :-o :-o

truebeliever, I almost certain they are referring to the mysterious "pod" underneath, on the belly of the aircraft. Which they claim, is a missile launcher of some sort. I do remember reading way back, that the purpose of this missile (according to the writer) was strictly for "effect", to make the explosion that much more "memorable" – for maximum “psychological impact.” If you look towards the end of that page, in the “CBC 911” link, you’ll notice another video still where they point out the “missile” coming right out of the back of the building, & then exploding into that big huge “explosion” we all remember.

Hey, did you get a chance look at the following post?

Re: The 911 Coincidence Guide - Post #39
http://www.clubconspiracy.com/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=1311&start=30

Pretty weird stuff…

8-)

[truebeliever]

I do remember reading way back, that the purpose of this missile (according to the writer) was strictly for "effect", to make the explosion that much more "memorable" – for maximum “psychological impact.”

I wonder about that. A great big plane full of fuel would be effect enough for me.

Plus the fact i've already wired the towers for demolition. Why complicate things.

I think much of this stuff is reaching.

Best. Have to dash. But will return

[Phi]

truebeliever wrote:
G'Day PHI,

Thats an interesting name...where does it come from?

Hi,

Thanks :-)

It comes from the golden ratio (also known as Phi).

Heh, might sound like i'm some frat boy or something I guess with a name like this :-?

http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/phi.html

[Jimbo]

Saddam’s Regime Change Outlined In PNAC’s Blue-Print – :-o :-o :-o


Saddam’s Regime Change Outlined In PNAC’s Document

“While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.'”

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions." - excerpts from "Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century"”
http://www.sundayherald.com/27735

<img src=http://www.apfn.org/apfn/midwayP.jpg height=278 width=350>
Midway

The “Pearl Harbor” Deception
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/pearl_harbor.htm

Rebuilding Americas Defenses - PNAC.pdf - The Original Document (.pdf file - requires Adobe Acrobat Reader)
"Any serious effort at transformation must occur within the larger framework of U.S national security strategy, military missions and defense budgets. The United States cannot simply declare a "strategic pause" while experimenting with new technologies and operational concepts. Nor can it choose to pursue a transformation strategy that would decouple American and allied interests. A transformation strategy that solely pursued capabilities for projecting force from the United States, for example, and sacrificed forward basing and presence, would be at odds with larger American policy goals and would trouble American allies.
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions." - excerpts from "Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century"
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

A PNAC Primer
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3544.htm

8-)

[Jimbo]

If 911 Was True (What We Know Of 911) ??? – :-o :-o :-o

Farenheit 2777
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colID=13&articleID=000DA0 E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000

If the “official story” was really “true,” as already claimed, then any other evidence should in fact, reconfirm the “official story,” & not “put is in question.” However, the fact that many individual pieces of evidence do question the released version of “what really happened”, then a true “scientific method” w/o reasonable doubt would show otherwise…

Regardless of what his point of view “really” is, the author did a great job outlining the (contrary to the official story) conspiracy theories, over the Internet, showing how 911 was our “new manufactured Pearl Harbor.” You must admit, those facts were well presented & I think w/o distortion, added.

I think the article addresses 2 separate audiences. The one “still” looking for the “truth,” & those already convinced or wan’na be convinced, for lack of any personal mental involvement.

I can’t say that I am convinced, he has already taken a side.

Debunking Of 911 Skeptics
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/sciam_reply.htm

8-)