Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > General Conspiracy Discussion
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-08-2005, 10:26 AM
Dreak Dreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 159
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack


What do these people expect from us !?

Its not like whoever is doing these attacks are goin after military installations..there blowing up inocent peeps goin about there daily life ( they have children,wives,husbands and friends and family )

If they even have a clue to whom is clueless in this world I would think they would stop blowing these poor souls up.

I know..we have blown up inocent people too in "military" campaigns.

The one thing that would scare the hell out of me is if some kind of Nuke/Biological weapon went off as a terrorist attack. I mean .. can you imagine what would happen then ? I could see the "mark of the beast" happining in Short order.

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-08-2005, 10:50 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

I think the Anthrax scare was their first attempt at biological warfare.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-08-2005, 11:31 AM
thokhanCep thokhanCep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 70
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

So I woke up yesterday , my father said it was an AL C I A duh kinda sky ... blue ... and clear . That was before the chem trails came out to play.

My sister the night before was smokin on some pot saw that Britian 2012 olympic bid was a go .. she mentioned to her stoner friend ... I bet they will have a terrorist strike.

I am outside doing a few chores and I hear that London has had a "terrorist" strike!!

Well oh my god.... I didn't rush out and buy a newspaper..or watch T V I figured the "underground" would dig up enough dirt to find out "who dunnit"

And of course there were prior warnings .. a heads up for "important" people to lay low.

The retards slipped up again!!

You would think that 9-11 was a leak fest and that they would screen the news releases.

Nope

Stupidity reigns supreme.

I think stupid people should perish
They stand behind their bought and paid for polivictims who make sure these fake/real operations happen smoothly.

They are the oil for the military industrial complex ... they keep the war machine churning.


I think I will start asking "who let 9-11 happen?"

In that question its obvious I am pointing at the illuminati/NWO/Skull and Bones
alpha gettio's

If they blurt out "Osama" than indeed they are too brain washed to be helped
which equals
Punch in face and or kick in groin
which ever

Seriously though
Buy some ammo .. get a gun.
Feel safe ... cause if we were all armed to the teeth

Dead "terrorists" do not look suspicious
They can not harm innocent people
and 95% are not even from the middle east
go figure........
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-08-2005, 02:44 PM
nohope187 nohope187 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,354
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Quote:
thokhanCep wrote:
95% are not even from the middle east
go figure........
They work in your local PD. You will hear the knock on your door at midnight and they will charge in wearing their usual attire- black ski masks and full body armor toting fully automatic weapons. strange how Hitlerist Germany and Stalinist Russia is happening here. :-P
__________________
So pardon me while I burst into flames.
I\'ve had enough of the world and it\'s people\'s mindless games.
So pardon me while I burn, and rise above the flame. Pardon me, pardon me, I\'ll never be the same. -Brandon Boyd
:roll:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
int: :evil: :-...
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-08-2005, 06:16 PM
igwt igwt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,391
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Interesting article from Dr Makow,' London is World Terror Headquarters' at http://savethemales.ca/
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-08-2005, 11:40 PM
igwt igwt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,391
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

More interesting info re early warning from Israel


Stratfor Consulting Intelligence Agency: 'Israel Warned United Kingdom About
Possible Attacks'
Bellacio | July 8 2005

There has been massive confusion over a denial made by the Israelis that the
Scotland Yard had warned the Israeli Embassy in London of possible terrorist
attacks "minutes before" the first bomb went off July 7. Israel warned
London of the attacks a "couple of days ago," but British authorities failed
to respond accordingly to deter the attacks, according to an unconfirmed
rumor circulating in intelligence circles. While Israel is keeping quiet for
the time-being, British Prime Minister Tony Blair soon will be facing the
heat for his failure to take action.

Analysis

The Associated Press reported July 7 that an anonymous source in the Israeli
Foreign Ministry said Scotland Yard had warned the Israeli Embassy in London
of possible terrorist attacks in the U.K. capital. The information
reportedly was passed to the embassy minutes before the first bomb struck at
0851 London time. The Israeli Embassy promptly ordered Israeli Finance
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to remain in his hotel on the morning of July 7.
Netanyahu was scheduled to participate in an Israeli Investment Forum
Conference at the Grand Eastern Hotel, located next to the Liverpool Street
Tube station -- the first target in the series of bombings that hit London
on July 7.

Several hours later, Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom officially
denied reports that Scotland Yard passed any information to Israel regarding
the bombings, and British police denied they had any advanced warning of the
attacks. The British authorities similarly denied that any information
exchange had occurred.

Contrary to original claims that Israel was warned "minutes before" the
first attack, unconfirmed rumors in intelligence circles indicate that the
Israeli government actually warned London of the attacks "a couple of days"
previous. Israel has apparently given other warnings about possible attacks
that turned out to be aborted operations. The British government did not
want to disrupt the G-8 summit in Gleneagles, Scotland, or call off visits
by foreign dignitaries to London, hoping this would be another false alarm.

The British government sat on this information for days and failed to
respond. (sic)

Though the Israeli government is playing along publicly, it may not stay
quiet for long. This is sure to apply pressure on Blair very soon for his
failure to deter this major terrorist attack.
For more breaking intelligence on this and other stories, please visit
premium.stratfor.com.


Report: Israel Was Warned Ahead of First Blast
10:43 Jul 08, '05 / 1 Tammuz 5765
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=85346

(IsraelNN.com) Army Radio quoting unconfirmed reliable sources reported a
short time ago that Scotland Yard had intelligence warnings of the attacks a
short time before they occurred.

The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his
way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool
Street train station, where he was to address an economic summit.

At present, train and bus service in London have been suspended following
the series of attacks. No terrorist organization has claimed responsibility
at this time.

Israeli officials stress the advanced Scotland Yard warning does not in any
way indicate Israel was the target in the series of apparent terror attacks.


'Scotland Yard was warned' says Israel Jul 7 2005
http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0600uk/tm_objectid=15710300&method=full&siteid=50082&head line=-scotland-yard-was-warned--says-israel-name_page.html

London's Terror Thursday: Netanyahu Warned ?
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/comments.php?id=2201_0_1_0_C

Ex-Israeli PM Netanyahu scheduled for talks at site of London blast
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/050707/323/fmtyr.html
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-09-2005, 01:02 AM
igwt igwt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,391
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Now Ephraim Halevy, the British-born
former Mossad chief, calls for world war!!!

Efraim Halevi, THE JERUSALEM POST Jul. 7, 2005

The multiple, simultaneous explosions that took place today on the
London transportation system were the work of perpetrators who had an
operational capacity of considerable scope. They have come a long way
since the two attacks of the year 1998 against the American embassies in
Nairobi and Dar-Es-Salaam, and the aircraft actions of September 11,
2001.

There was careful planning, intelligence gathering, and a sophisticated
choice of timing as well as near-perfect execution. We are faced with a
deadly and determined adversary who will stop at nothing and will
persevere as long as he exists as a fighting terrorist force.

One historical irony: I doubt whether the planners knew that one of the
target areas, that in Russell Square, was within a stone's throw of a
building that served as the first headquarters of the World Zionist
Organization that preceded the State of Israel.

It was at 77 Great Russell Street that Dr. Chaim Weizmann, a renowned
chemist, presided over the effort that culminated in the issuing of the
Balfour Declaration, the first international recognition of the right of
the Jewish people to a national home in what was then still a part of
the Ottoman Empire.

We are in the throes of a world war, raging over the entire globe and
characterized by the absence of lines of conflict and an easily
identifiable enemy. There are sometimes long pauses between one attack
and another, consequently creating the wrong impression that the battle
is all over, or at least in the process of being won.

Generally speaking, the populations at large are not involved in the
conflict, and by and large play the role of bystanders. But once in a
while, these innocents are caught up in the maelstrom and suffer the
most cruel and wicked of punishments meted out by those who are not
bound by any rules of conduct or any norms of structured society. For a
while, too short a while, we are engrossed with the sheer horror of what
we see and hear, but, with the passage of time, our memories fade and we
return to our daily lives, forgetting that the war is still raging out
there and more strikes are sure to follow.

It cannot be said that seven years after this war broke out in east
Africa, we can see its conclusion. We are in for the long haul and we
must brace ourselves for more that will follow. The 'Great Wars' of the
20th century lasted less than this war has already lasted, and the end
is nowhere in sight.

There will be supreme tests of leadership in this unique situation and
people will have to trust the wisdom and good judgment of those chosen
to govern them. The executives must be empowered to act resolutely and
to take every measure necessary to protect the citizens of their country
and to carry the combat into whatever territory the perpetrators and
their temporal and spiritual leaders are inhabiting.

The rules of combat must be rapidly adjusted to cater to the necessities
of this new and unprecedented situation, and international law must be
rewritten in such a way as to permit civilization to defend itself.
Anything short of this invites disaster and must not be allowed to
happen.

The aim of the enemy is not to defeat western civilization but to
destroy its sources of power and existence, and to render it a relic of
the past. It does not seek a territorial victory or a regime change; it
wants to turn western civilization into history and will stop at nothing
less than that.

It will show no mercy or compassion and no appreciation for these noble
values when practiced by us. This does not mean that we can or should
assume the norms of our adversaries, nor that we should act
indiscriminately. It does mean that the only way to ensure our safety
and security will be to obtain the destruction, the complete
destruction, of the enemy.

MUCH HAS been said in recent years about the vital need for
international cooperation. There is no doubt that this is essential. Yet
no measure of this will suffice and it cannot replace the requirement
that each and every country effectively declare itself at war with
international Islamist terror and recruit the public to involve itself
actively in the battle, under the direction of the legal powers that be.

In the past, governments have been expected to provide security to their
citizens. The responsibility is still there, in principle. But in
practice, no government today can provide an effective 'suit of
protection' for the ordinary citizen. There can be no protection for
every bus, every train, every street, every square. In these times the
ordinary citizen must be vigilant and must make his personal
contribution to the war effort. Private enterprise will have to
supplement the national effort in many walks of life.

The measures that I have outlined above will not be easily adopted
overnight. When the US entered World War Two, Congress approved the
momentous decision by a majority of one vote. Profound cultural changes
will have to come about and the democratic way of life will be hard-
pressed to produce solutions that will enable the executive branch to
perform its duties and, at the same time, to preserve the basic tenets
of our democratic way of life. It will not be easy, but it will be
essential not to lose sight of every one of these necessities.

This war is already one of the longest in modern times; as things appear
now, it is destined to be part of our daily lives for many years to
come, until the enemy is eliminated, as it surely will be.

The writer, who heads the Center for Strategic and Policy Studies at the
Hebrew University in Jerusalem, is a former head of the Mossad.

http://tinyurl.com/az4tf
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-09-2005, 08:25 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Isn't there an article within this thread that reports arrests were made?

I'm reading an article now that reports NO arrests were made.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-09-2005, 08:40 AM
Dreak Dreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 159
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

I would think that some arrests have been made..however I dont think they will go public untill the interrigations and agreements have been done.

Know that you will probably not know too much about anyone involved. even if there were public arrests they could be decoys to decieve the "terrorists" into thinking we know nothing about the actual peeps involved behind these things.

Peace Dreak
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-09-2005, 11:58 AM
nohope187 nohope187 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,354
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Why the fuck am I not suprised. :-P
Attack On London: Blair Plays The Terror Card
Prison Planet | July 7, 2005
By Paul Joseph Watson
The attack on London represents a brutal attempt to coral the British population behind accepting the introduction of the national ID card, renewing support for the war on terror and reinvigorating trust in a government that had the backing of less than 15 per cent of the country.
Even at this very early stage it is clear that the evidence points to inside involvement.
The statement on a website from an unknown Al-Qaeda group claiming responsibility is exactly what we'd expect after such an event. Santa Claus could post a message saying he was responsible for the attack, does that make it so? Rupert Murdoch's Sky News are busy playing Al-Qaeda training videos with masked militants jumping through flaming hoops. The emotive propaganda is clear, these images are being linked in montages with past images of 9/11, the Bali bombing and the Madrid bombing and injured people crying in the streets.
Even if the police and government back away from the Al-Qaeda claim, which now appears to be the case, pro-establishment Neo-Con media outlets will repeat it like an endless drumbeat until it sinks in.
The key evidence thus far is as follows.
Original Associated Press and Israeli radio reports stated that Binyamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli Prime Minister received a warning before the first explosion that an attack was about to take place. Scotland Yard passed on a warning to the Israeli embassy who forwarded it to Netanyahu. Netanyahu was due to make a speech at a Hotel adjacent to the site of the first blast. He cancelled the speech and remained in his hotel room.
Arutz Sheva sourced Army Radio with the following.
"The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit."
For an hour after the first blast, the government and the news media were reporting that the cause was an electrical power surge. If the government knew bombs were going to go off before they did, why did they report for an hour that it was an accident? Were they trying to bide time so they could get their story straight?
Both Scotland Yard and the Israelis have since denied that they had any foreknowledge of the attack.
Since the original report, major TV news networks have been completely silent on the Netanyahu story. They are just repeating claims that there was no prior knowledge.
About an hour after the story broke, Associated Press started altering their online news stories, stating that Netanyahu got the warning after the first blast and not before. It seems as if they are scrambling to co-ordinate their cover story. Either there were no warnings or the warning was after the first blast. The dithering seems to suggest there is some confusion on how to successfully hide the smoking gun, the fact that Netanyahu was warned before the first explosion.
Why didn't the people on the trains and buses get the same warning?
On June 7th, MI5 downgraded the London terror alert from its second highest level “severe general” to a lower category of “substantial”.
Why did they do this, was somebody lowering the guard?
The timing of the attack is very suspicious, coming on the heels of the start of the G8 conference. Both Tony Blair and George Bush in their speeches have tried to paint the attack as an assault on globalization and the G8 itself. This means that if you're against the G8 and globalization, then you're with the terrorists! It's a tried and tested method they've used time and time before.
In any crime you look at history and motive, The British government has been caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings in London which were then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5 agents wihin the Omagh bomb squad. The British government has also been caught scripting fake terror alerts for political effect. Days before the Queen's speech notable November speech in which she first introduced ID card legislation, ITN news correspondants and government lobbyists got together to cook up a fake terror alert involving planes attacking Canary Wharf. A London Independent article later exposed this as a crass psy-op campaign to get the British people behind the ID card.
From Putin blowing up his own apartment buildings to Israel being behind Hamas, the evidence is consistently clear that large scale terrorism is always state sponsored.
The Madrid train bombing is another example. The bombers were found to be police informants with close links to the Spanish security services. They had access to the most secure areas of the Madrid train system. The Spanish government initially tried to blaim the Basque group ETA for the blast in the hope that the people would rally behind the government and get them re-elected. After ETA denied involvement and the people started saying the government was involved, the Spanish government had to blame Al-Qaeda and kill some patsies by claiming they blew themselves up during a raid.
The wider agenda will become clearer when Blair firmly points the finger at the selected patsies designated to take the fall. But for the moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who immedately returned to London to take control of the chaos.
BBC polls that were showing 80 per cent plus opposed the ID card will now likely flip back in the opposite direction. Support for the European Union and increased globalization through the G8 will rise. Who stands to gain from all this? Who has the motive?
We will continue to track developments as they occur and keep our readers posted
__________________
So pardon me while I burst into flames.
I\'ve had enough of the world and it\'s people\'s mindless games.
So pardon me while I burn, and rise above the flame. Pardon me, pardon me, I\'ll never be the same. -Brandon Boyd
:roll:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
int: :evil: :-...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Next Terrorist Attack in U.S. sh200kr North America 21 12-15-2007 06:46 PM
Muslim convert gets 15 years 4 "Maybe" planning a Terrorist Attack. truebeliever What is really going on? 2 09-24-2005 06:37 AM
One Of The 4 "London Bombers" Has Appeared In Video Explaining Reasons For Attack! truebeliever Opinions 10 09-05-2005 11:30 AM
Bets on when the next terrorist attack is, and when the US invades Iran Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 12 08-17-2005 11:28 AM
Attention ppl who know numerology: When is the next terrorist attack going to be? Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 1 07-25-2005 07:37 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.