Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > General Conspiracy Discussion
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 07-09-2005, 12:09 PM
nohope187 nohope187 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,354
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack


Typical government bullshit, this is so fucking predictable. :-P

Clarke set to rush through emergency arrest powers
Possessing A-Z of London a terrorist offence
London Independent | July 8, 2005
Ministers are expected to rush through measures to arrest and detain suspects accused of acts associated with terrorism as an immediate reaction to yesterday's bombings.
A draft Bill outlined in the Queen's Speech in May set out plans to create offences to bring more terror suspects before the courts and is expected to lead to convictions for those accused of acts preparatory to terrorism.
Yesterday's attacks on London will also make it more difficult for the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats to oppose the introduction of identity cards.
But lawyers and civil rights groups urged the Government not to repeat the mistakes of the past. Peter Carter QC, chairman of the Bar's human rights committee, said he feared the Government would adopt emergency powers that would cause further resentment in Muslim communities but not make Britain a safer place to live.
Mr Carter said: "History has shown us that it is never good to rush through legislation. The laws passed to combat the IRA in the 1970s and 1980s proved a political and a legal disaster."
Mr Carter said the police and security services already had sufficient powers to deal with the threat posed by al-Qa'ida, including an offence of possessing items that were of potential use to a terrorist. Such items, he said, could include an A-Z of London.
Those arrested in the inevitable police raids that will follow yesterday's atrocities are expected to be detained under the toughest powers at the security forces' disposal.
Under the terms of the 2005 Prevention of Terrorism Act, the Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, has the option of using house arrest to detain terror suspects.
Mr Clarke told Parliament in February that he was considering introducing the offence of "being concerned in the commission preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism".
In a statement to the Commons, he said: "Some believe that the absence in this country of a terrorist outrage such as 9/11 or Madrid means that the terrorist threat has passed us by or failed to materialise. That view is short-sighted, complacent, ignorant of the facts and potentially cavalier in the disregard of the safety of this country.

__________________
So pardon me while I burst into flames.
I\'ve had enough of the world and it\'s people\'s mindless games.
So pardon me while I burn, and rise above the flame. Pardon me, pardon me, I\'ll never be the same. -Brandon Boyd
:roll:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
int: :evil: :-...
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-09-2005, 12:18 PM
Dreak Dreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 159
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Is CC a "copy and paste" forum ?

for the love of god...

Could you..possibly..post your OWN thoughts ? once and a while..mebbe ? I can find blogs for whatever you want on anything..but you can have your own opinions on somthing once and a while eh ?

just post the freaking link if you want to copy and paste..Ill read it in its own context thank you very much !

D.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-09-2005, 12:44 PM
Thumper Thumper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 763
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Interesting how the mainstream media was initially reporting SIX BOMBS going off, when it was only FOUR. And now Scotland Yard is suddenly denying that TWO unexploded bombs were found.


Isn't it awkward when the script doesn't match the play? :-P
__________________
\"six or seven men can plunge the nation into war, or, what is perhaps equally disastrous, commit it to entangling alliances without consulting Parliament at all.\"

--Andrew Carnegie
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07-09-2005, 01:00 PM
Dreak Dreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 159
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

I never heard of 6 bombs..only 4

were did you get your info ?

and can you prove that 6 went off..or that 2 are discounted..post some links please.

Dreak
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 07-09-2005, 03:41 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Quote:
Thumper wrote:
Interesting how the mainstream media was initially reporting SIX BOMBS going off, when it was only FOUR. And now Scotland Yard is suddenly denying that TWO unexploded bombs were found.


Isn't it awkward when the script doesn't match the play? :-P

Very awkward!!

Life is but a play!!

I need to search through this haystack for the 4/6 bomb theory and the arrests and no arrests.

With every act of terror, they tighten the nooses around our necks even more.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 07-09-2005, 03:41 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Quote:
Dreak wrote:
Is CC a "copy and paste" forum ?

for the love of god...

Could you..possibly..post your OWN thoughts ? once and a while..mebbe ? I can find blogs for whatever you want on anything..but you can have your own opinions on somthing once and a while eh ?

just post the freaking link if you want to copy and paste..Ill read it in its own context thank you very much !

D.
I like to "cut and paste." That's my favorite thingy to do!!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 07-09-2005, 03:50 PM
Thumper Thumper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 763
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Blue Angel, why don't you join iidb.org?

We're just preaching to the choir here. :-P
__________________
\"six or seven men can plunge the nation into war, or, what is perhaps equally disastrous, commit it to entangling alliances without consulting Parliament at all.\"

--Andrew Carnegie
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 07-09-2005, 04:09 PM
igwt igwt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,391
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Quote:
Dreak wrote:
Is CC a "copy and paste" forum ?

for the love of god...

Could you..possibly..post your OWN thoughts ? once and a while..mebbe ? I can find blogs for whatever you want on anything..but you can have your own opinions on somthing once and a while eh ?

just post the freaking link if you want to copy and paste..Ill read it in its own context thank you very much !

D.
Where possible links were provided. Reason some were posted completed, as they were on usenet and link wasn't provided.

Other stories have links where possible.

If you were following the thread you would have seen comment by BlueAngel regarding posting stories to provide overall comparison of conflicting accounts i.e media spin.


Here are more links for anyone interested:

http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/canon_fodder/0889_what_behind_london_attacks.html

Rhetoric vs. Reality in London

http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=6898


Massive hunt for perpetrators of London bomb blasts

Jane’s Intelligence Digest

http://www.janes.com/security/law_enforcement/news/misc/janes050708_1_n.shtml


SO WHAT DO THEY WANT?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=15717514&method=full&siteid=94762&head line=so-what-do-they-want--name_page.html



Al-Qaida offshoot may be London bombers:-

http://news.webindia123.com/news/showdetails.asp?id=95310&cat=World


London Lives

http://www.alternet.org/story/23437/



UK policy invited attacks – Iran

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4665133.stm



ID cards 'wouldn't stop attacks'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/4663155.stm
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 07-09-2005, 04:10 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Quote:
Thumper wrote:
Blue Angel, why don't you join iidb.org?

We're just preaching to the choir here. :-P
What is it?

Can you provide the link to get me there and I'll check it out!!

Thanks!!
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 07-09-2005, 04:13 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: London Terrorist Attack

Dreak,

Did you see that?

"If you were following the thread you would have seen comment by BlueAngel regarding posting stories to provide overall comparison of conflicting accounts i.e media spin."

I know it's difficult for you Dreak, but if you have the time sort through this thread and you will see with your own eyes, that the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing.

Scrambled brains, anyone??

If it's too complicated for you and you don't like cut and paste, you can always find another site that better suits your needs.

I don't think those who operate this site have a problem with it!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Next Terrorist Attack in U.S. sh200kr North America 21 12-15-2007 06:46 PM
Muslim convert gets 15 years 4 "Maybe" planning a Terrorist Attack. truebeliever What is really going on? 2 09-24-2005 06:37 AM
One Of The 4 "London Bombers" Has Appeared In Video Explaining Reasons For Attack! truebeliever Opinions 10 09-05-2005 11:30 AM
Bets on when the next terrorist attack is, and when the US invades Iran Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 12 08-17-2005 11:28 AM
Attention ppl who know numerology: When is the next terrorist attack going to be? Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 1 07-25-2005 07:37 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.