Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > Current events > What is really going on?
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 06-18-2005, 06:11 PM
nohope187 nohope187 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,354
Default Re: Communism still alive and kickin' your ass


AMERICAN GULAG
COMING SOON
Alan Stang | June 18 2005
It was Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the Russian writer, who made the "gulag archipelago" part of our language. He won the Nobel Prize for the book of that name, lived here in exile and was mentioned in the media almost every day—until he made the fateful speech at Harvard, one of many universities founded to spread word of Jesus Christ.
On June 8th, 1978, Solzhenitsyn told a Harvard audience that "convergence" of the Soviet and American systems was doomed. "Convergence" has of course been one of the main purposes of the conspiracy for world government since the beginning. While he spoke, it was well under way.
Solzhenitsyn also made these telling comments: "As humanism in its development became more and more materialistic, it made itself increasingly accessible to speculation and manipulation at first by socialism and then by communism. So that Karl Marx was able to say in 1844 that ‘communism is naturalized humanism.’" Humanism is of course the official government religion of this country. Maybe he didn’t know that.
He concluded as follows: "There is a disaster, however, which has already been under way for quite some time. I am referring to the calamity of a despiritualized and irreligious humanistic consciousness. . . . To such consciousness, man is the touchstone in judging and evaluating everything on earth. Imperfect man, who is never free of pride, self-interest, envy, vanity, and dozens of other defects. We . . . have lost the concept of a Supreme Complete Entity which used to restrain our passions and our irresponsibility. We have placed too much hope in political and social reforms, only to find out that we were being deprived of our most precious possession: our spiritual life."
With these remarks, Alexander Solzhenitsyn was confronting and exposing the insane Communist monsters who have usurped control of this country. Before that speech, the Communist media had made him an international celebrity, perhaps because the conspiracy for world government found his revelations about the horrors of the gulag temporarily useful. After that speech, he disappeared from public consciousness like a comet. Today, few Americans can remember his name.
What did Solzhenitsyn say about the gulag? "At what exact point, then, should one resist? When one’s belt is taken away. When one is ordered to face into a corner? When one crosses the threshold of one’s home? . . . ." The same questions that are bothering you now. Solzhenitsyn bitterly laments the Russian failure to resist:
"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? . . ."
Apparently, they had no guns. Solzhenitsyn does not mention them. But he believes that axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else they had, could have done the job. He continues: ". . . After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you’d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur—what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"
One is reminded of "Death Wish," starring the late Charles Bronson. The architect hero was not a terrorist, i.e., he did not kill indiscriminately. He did not kill the innocent. He was mild, even harmless, until the guilty attacked. Then, he brought out the hog leg and went to work. Whenever he did so, the theater audience cheered. Acting alone, he turned New York on its ear. Other inmates, inspired, began to do the same. Criminals were indignant. Didn’t these New Yorkers know that packing heat was illegal? Crime fell. Imagine the effect of an epidemic of Bronsons.

That is what Russians should have done, says Solzhenitsyn. Of course, they didn’t do it. They "burned in the camps later" lamenting that fact: "If . . . if . . . We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more—we had no awareness of the real situation. . . . We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward."
They lost everything because they were too cowardly to act, because they didn’t love freedom enough. Of course, they were Russians, not Americans. Instead of SWAT and IRS CID, they had Organs. For centuries, they had lived under tyranny, benevolent or otherwise. They were emerging from that tyranny when the Communists perpetrated their coup by seizing a few buildings in Petrograd. They didn’t know what Communism was. They could not look back at what the Communists had done.
They did not have the benefit of more than two centuries of liberty. They did not have the untrammeled American spirit. They did not have thousands of retired Marine Corps snipers who still can stick it in your eye, and other thousands of retired Screaming Eagles who still can bring death from the sky. They did not have the guns. They did not have the .50 caliber rifle. They were not Americans. They had not stood with Stonewall Jackson.
What kind of resistance is Solzhenitsyn talking about? He is clearly not talking about a military unit, not even about a militia or any group at all. He is talking about what we might call leaderless, unorganized resistance, what later in the century, in Vietnam, Americans called "targets of opportunity," the people acting individually, their acts adding up to a devastating whole, a "life wish." There would have been nothing to infiltrate and no leader to kill.
By then, the Russian people had the moral right to do whatever they could get away with, like the German people under Hitler, like anyone living under a totalitarian dictatorship. The dictators had cancelled the law, which is a contractual agreement, so the people who had been defrauded no longer were required to perform. If you sign a contract to buy a house, and the owner refuses to vacate, you don’t need to make payments.
Of course, nothing I have said so far has any application here. Not at all. In fact, do not—do not—do not even contemplate doing what Solzhenitsyn says he and his fellow Russians should have done. After all, have not our Communist media utterly discredited him? I recall it simply because I am a history buff and it is interesting history. This is nothing more than a book review.
Certainly, I am not suggesting anything. It would be presumptuous to tell you what to do. Your own principles and circumstances will guide you. As Frank "The Chairman" Sinatra, warbled, "I did it my way!" And to paraphrase the liberaloid mantra, "If it feels right, do it."
A word should be said about Romans 13. For many years, pulpit pansies in the pay of the powers that would like to be have preached that Romans 13 teaches unconditional obedience to government. Whatever government does, according to this teaching, we have to endure it, because God has installed government for good.
Yes, He has, but since the men who run government are men, the chance is great that they will go bad. That is why God did the job Himself, through His judges, until His children demanded a king. Through Samuel, He warned them what a king would do. He would eat out their substance, etc. When stiff-necked Israelites would not yield, He gave them Saul. Guess what? God was—is—right. Scripture is full of cases of government run amok. When that happens, God sends someone to overthrow it.
King Jabin, the government, was oppressing the people. Jael lulled Sisera, his commanding general, to sleep and then nailed that old boy to the ground with a spike through his temples. Scripture says Jael is "blessed above women." The children of Israel sang about her in celebration of her exploit.
Eglon, king of Moab, oppressed the people. Ehud parked a knife in his belly. His majesty was so fat his belly closed around the knife, so that for a while the coroner couldn’t find the cause of death until crime scene investigators showed him the weapon. Scripture says Ehud was a deliverer whom the Lord had raised up.
Wasn’t Paul a notorious jailbird? Wasn’t Peter? Wasn’t Jesus a criminal? He must have been, according to today’s pansy preachers, because the government—the Sanhedrin and the Romans—said He was. Didn’t He destroy property and use violence when He kicked the moneychangers out? Didn’t He break the law Himself?
If you preach that the government can do no wrong and must be obeyed blindly whatever it does, that is where you must wind up. Romans 13 means that you must obey and defer to government as long as it does what God installed it to do. When government stops doing what God installed it to do—stops clearly and incontrovertibly—your obedience is no longer required. Weren’t our Founding Fathers criminals?
Is God a Nazi? That is the question. If you subscribe to the preaching of today’s pansy preachers, you believe He is. You believe you must obey Hitler because he is the government. You believe you must defer to whatever crimes the government commits because of what some pansy preacher says about Romans 13.
So you see, pal, the fact that you may put your collar on backward or have three first names, etc., cuts you no slack here. And by the way, those pansy preachers revere Martin Luther King, Jr. Wasn’t King in the Birmingham jail when he wrote his famous letter from Birmingham jail (if he wrote it)?
Wasn’t he there because he defied the government? Which governments does Romans 13 say we must obey? Regular readers will also remember that today’s Christianity has been infiltrated from top to bottom by Communists, starting even before World War II. Could that be the reason today’s pansy preachers pervert Romans 13? Are they deliberately trying to neutralize the faithful?
The gulag is coming, tovarish. What will you do?
BEND OVER AND TAKE IT LIKE THE FAITHFUL WORSHIPER OF THE STATE THAT YOU ARE? :-P

__________________
So pardon me while I burst into flames.
I\'ve had enough of the world and it\'s people\'s mindless games.
So pardon me while I burn, and rise above the flame. Pardon me, pardon me, I\'ll never be the same. -Brandon Boyd
:roll:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
int: :evil: :-...
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 08-07-2005, 10:13 PM
this this is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 281
Default Re: Communism still alive and kickin' your ass

http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/5-8-6/30974.html
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 08-08-2005, 06:10 AM
AgentOrange AgentOrange is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 17
Default Re: Communism still alive and kickin' your ass

Ive been studying the nature of power for quite a while, and was enjoying this thread until I felt compeled enough to actually register to make two points:

#1 truebeliever knows his stuff, he has made some of the most elequent, succinct, and well thought out statements regarding the true architecture of power

#2 Ozziecynic is one of the dumbest functional retards ive seen trolling a forum, who has absoltely no concept of world power outside of a carefully engineered & prescribed paradigm


seriously, sometimes i wonder if this moron can tie his shoes, yet hes got near perfect spelling. where the fuck do these pseudointellectual douchebags come from? this retard contradicts himself in ways he clearly cant even comprehend.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 08-08-2005, 06:18 AM
AgentOrange AgentOrange is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 17
Default Re: SOVIET PSYCHOPOLITICS

the other effect of the perestroika deception is the current generation that doesnt even begin to comprehend WHAT the soviet union even was.

for example

when i was a child we understood clearly and without question what tyranny was, it was a large police state that had shit like internal passports and police with ultimate powers. we could even look at it and point at it and know it.

i see that the current generation that will be actually implementing the soviet convergence of america has no fundamental comprehension of what communism actually is.

basically, my nation is being disassembled by ignorant children
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 08-08-2005, 06:50 AM
AgentOrange AgentOrange is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 17
Default Re: The Illusion of Safety

Quote:
Ozziecynic wrote:
Th:
Quote:
It's probably worth talking about, however in one of your posts you seem to not care about 'Armageddon' since it's phrophesised which seems a little defeatist.
Since the Fall in Eden and the temptation for forbidden knowledge.Humanity is imperfect there fore that is why the world is going to be destroyed. Not a matter of defeatism there is nothing to be perfected in the temporal dimension.We are simply imperfect and must be punshied for our lack of submission to God!.

As for the communism subject! Are you deluded! Sure there maybe an excuse for draken over there in hyperborea Carpathian for believing in such a thing still. But for you in canada which is much like Australia in terms of its economic system i find plain dumb to call Laissez faire capitalism or Corporatism under the name of communism unless ofcause like so many others your a reactionary redneck righwinger of the uneducated kind. In that case we arent really on the same side as many others here are also finding out slowly!.:roll:
see kid, its the same thing. you are a useless elitist twit who believes hes "educated" out of the "false left right" and at the same time arguing that corporatism and communism arent actually the same fundamental ideology. why is that? HAHA thats because you are deeply entrenched in the false paradigm you pretend to dispute.


my god the irony is rich


ps. you should learn the difference between you're and your when you are pretending to be so educated. also using so many exclamation points just makes you seem like the manic turd you are!!
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 08-08-2005, 07:19 AM
AgentOrange AgentOrange is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 17
Default Re: The Illusion of Safety

nobody will ever convince me that all of western intelligence is just too stupid to figure out whats going on. and western 'capitalists' are just simply too ignorant to understand what moving the high-tech manufacturing base to china would really mean.

oh yah and that the richest bastards on the globe are really "right wing capitalists"... right OC? hahahahah
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 08-09-2005, 02:50 PM
Draken Draken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 896
Default Re: The Illusion of Safety

No, Western intelligence and "capitalists" are Soviet/Communist trained <a href="http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/psychopolitics.html">psychopoliticians</a>. This is the true subversion and destruction of the Western World and the Western mind; this Satanic Communist brainwashing is highly contagious and spreads like a global virus and destroys the possibility of a spiritual reality for 99.9% of all people.

The Leninist-Marxists of Communist Russia have planned the destruction and submission of the world for over 100 years.
__________________
Three things are sacred to me: first Truth, and then, in its tracks, primordial prayer; Then virtue–nobility of soul which, in God walks on the path of beauty. Frithjof Schuon
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 08-09-2005, 04:58 PM
AgentOrange AgentOrange is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 17
Default Re: The Illusion of Safety

yah no kidding,

and?

who are you talking to?
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 08-10-2005, 12:25 AM
Draken Draken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 896
Default Re: The Illusion of Safety

You and anyone else who's reading. Just commenting on your last post.
__________________
Three things are sacred to me: first Truth, and then, in its tracks, primordial prayer; Then virtue–nobility of soul which, in God walks on the path of beauty. Frithjof Schuon
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 08-15-2005, 08:59 PM
this this is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 281
Default Re: Commie/US history

Some really good snippets of history at the following website, including a few excerpts below:

http://www.the7thfire.com/new_world_order/final_warning/global_spread_of_communism.htm

http://www.the7thfire.com/new_world_order/final_warning/communism_comes_to_china-.htm

http://www.the7thfire.com/new_world_order/final_warning/rise_of_hitler_and_pearl_harbor.htm


“In the spring of 1943, a faction within the German Secret Service was prepared to assassinate Hitler, and surrender, on one condition– that the Soviets would not be allowed to advance into Central Europe. Roosevelt refused to accept, and postponed a planned European invasion, in order to give the Russians more time to advance, and occupy more land. According to military documents released in 1970, Gen. Eisenhower allowed the Russians to get to Berlin first, before the Americans, which eventually allowed part of the city to fall under Communist control.

Russia was able to come away from 1945 Conference in Yalta with so much, because Roosevelt believed that the Russians were “perfectly friendly. They aren’t trying to gobble up the rest of Europe. These fears that have been expressed by a lot of people here that the Russians are going to try and dominate Europe, I personally don’t think there is anything do it ... I have just a hunch that Stalin ... doesn’t want anything but security for his country, and I think that if I give him everything I possibly can, and ask nothing in return, he won’t try to annex anything and will work for a world of democracy and peace.” Russia walked away from the bargaining table with Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, eastern Poland, east and central Europe, N. Korea, the Kuril Islands, and the northern part of Sakhalin.

An American General, Albert C. Wedemeyer, was convinced that Russia was the only winner of World War II. He said: “Stalin was intent on creating favorable conditions for the realization of Communist aims throughout the Balkans and Western Europe. He emerged as the only winner of the War. We insured the emergence of a more hostile, menacing predatory power than Nazi Germany, one which has enslaved more people than we liberated.”

and

“THE DECEPTION OF PEARL HARBOR

In the Pacific Theater, the stirrings of World War II actually began years before. China had allowed Japan to drill for oil in several provinces, because Standard Oil’s price for kerosene was too high. Through contacts in the Chinese government, Standard Oil had been able to keep anyone from drilling, until the Japanese came and developed huge fields. Standard Oil pushed them out, but the Japanese vowed to return, even going as far as saying that they would seize China to recover their oil investments.

When the Japanese invaded China in the 1930’s, one of their first acts was to destroy Standard Oil property, because they had been responsible for their ouster.

In 1931, Henry L. Stimson, the Secretary of State (a Rockefeller lawyer and agent), met with President Herbert Hoover, on behalf of the Illuminati, to make a deal. The international bankers promised to end the Depression if Hoover would declare war on Japan, and send in the military to protect Standard Oil property. Even though Hoover accommodated the bankers in many cases, this was one deal that he refused.

So Stimson pitched the idea to Governor Franklin Delano Roosevelt (who has a dozen U. S. Presidents in his family tree), who was indebted to them because of his philanthropic operation at Georgia’s Warm Springs. “
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American Gulag............Coming Soon Barbara Resistance is not futile 2 10-07-2007 04:29 PM
Cleveland Women Put In Gulag General Conspiracy Discussion 0 05-14-2006 04:18 PM
Communism vs. Capitalism SeC Opinions 5 12-15-2005 03:28 PM
The Income Tax Gulag Resistance is not futile 0 12-06-2005 01:54 PM
Communism vs. Capitalism SeC Opinions 7 11-06-2005 01:22 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.