Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > Current events > What is really going on?
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 03-21-2005, 04:01 AM
Draken Draken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 896
Default Communism Through Gramscian Eyes


Brilliant quotes:

"Those who accept uncritically the idea that "Communism is dead" fail to understand the true nature of the enemy. Communism is not an ideology in which one believes. Rather, it is a criminal conspiracy in which one enlists."

------

"The hard core of the Communist movement consisted of ruthless criminals, clear-eyed in their understanding of the intellectual errors of Marxism, who were willing to employ any necessary means to obtain the power they sought. For such hardened, hate-intoxicated conspirators, ideology is a tactic, a means of mobilizing supporters and rationalizing criminal actions.

The Bolsheviks did not come to power in Russia by any uprising of the workers and peasants, but by a coup d' etat, orchestrated by a tightly disciplined Marxist cadre and ultimately consolidated by civil war. They also received--lest it be forgotten--critical help from Western political and banking elites."

------

"The only popular revolutionary upheavals recorded in the 20th century have been anti-Marxist "counter-revolutions," such as the revolt in Berlin in 1954 and the Hungarian uprising of 1956."[Actually, concerning the Hungarian "revolt" I'm sorry to say recent information and research in Hungary confirm the fact that this "popular uprising" was in fact orchestrated and planned by the Soviet Communists, to manifacture an excuse not to leave Hungary after the agreed timespan with the West, of 10 years of "control."/Draken]


From the article <a href="http://www.grecoreport.com/gramsci's_grand_plan.htm">Gramsci's Grand Plan</a>

__________________
Three things are sacred to me: first Truth, and then, in its tracks, primordial prayer; Then virtue–nobility of soul which, in God walks on the path of beauty. Frithjof Schuon
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 03-25-2005, 09:15 AM
Draken Draken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 896
Default ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC THREATS IN THE CURRENT DECADE (2000-2010)

<a href="http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/threats.html">ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC THREATS
IN THE CURRENT DECADE
(2000-2010)
By Joel M. Skousen</a>



As I'm reading Skousen's analysis of the Communist threat to the US and the world a few things spring to mind.

First of all, Skousen's report is on par with other sources of comprehensive competence I've read, like Christopher Story's book <a href="http://www.edwardharle.com/edwardharle/the_european_union_collective">"The European Collective: Enemy Of Its Member States"</a>.
My response to those who think these are paranoid ideas is that if I can think them so can the geopolitical strategists in the Kreml, WHOSE JOB IT IS to think these thoughts!

Secondly, the overall picture seems to me to be that while the Communists are building up military power in preparation for WW3, their intelligence services are going to help by infiltrating US intelligence and political structures. That way they can stall inspections of military bases, make the Americans sign treaties that they themselves NEVER intended to keep in the first place, etc. This is what seems to be happening as we speak.

Thirdly, I've been wondering for some years now what all those nuclear, biological and chemical weapons - apart from the new highly sophisticated exotic weapons like Ultra Low Frequency Sound Beam weapons and space-based laser and pulse weapons - are going to be used for, IF NOT AGGRESSIVE ASSAULT as opposed to DEFENSIVE activities.
Somehow I don't think the Marxist-Leninists are going to be content fighting a proxy war forever. The current war of deception and lies <a href="http://all.net/books/tzu/tzu.html">Sun Tzu-style</a> is only a build up to the war proper, whenever they decide the time is right.

Regarding Russia's supposed complete release of countries like Poland, Hungary and former East Germany; I wonder how much of a "release" it really is when 2nd and 3rd echelon Communist cadres have taken over every level of economic, social, political and cultural life in these countries. On the contrary; the fact that they could withdraw their troops in total confidence they would keep their grip and control of these countries is just a part of the grand deception of "The Fall of Communism". And it's worked fabulously, suckering Europe to invite even, the "former" Communist countries into The EU, not realizing this is EXACTLY what the Marxist-Leninists wanted!

Regarding the supposed competition between China and Russia, I've heard from sources in Hungary that an immense amount of Chinese are flooding the country and has been since at least 10 years now. I suppose they come in to "work" for companies, so they are in a way legal. But the amount is worrying; if you think about the fact that in England you simply don't have Asian police officers - because the Freemasons who control the British police force are scared shitless that if they start employing Asian people they soon will be taken over by the Chinese Triads - then the current events in Hungary really makes you wonder, doesn't it?

Christopher Story mentions the Marxist-Leninist strategy of exporting <a href="http://www.edwardharle.com/edwardharle/the_new_underworld_order">"criminalism"</a> to the world. This means to export organized crime and mafias as a strategy of conquest, and since the GRU/KGB is the source of funding and organizing the Russian mafias I see a method to the madness of the Russian mafia spreading like a virus all over the world.

Check out Christopher Story's new book <a href="http://www.edwardharle.com/edwardharle/the_new_underworld_order">"THE NEW UNDERWORLD ORDER - Triumph of Criminalism: Dark Actors Playing Games"</a>
__________________
Three things are sacred to me: first Truth, and then, in its tracks, primordial prayer; Then virtue–nobility of soul which, in God walks on the path of beauty. Frithjof Schuon
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 03-25-2005, 04:14 PM
this this is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 281
Default Re: ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC THREATS IN THE CURRENT DECADE (2000-2010)

Draken wrote:

"What can we do to combat Gramsci-style subversion?

If unchecked, is there a point of no return, from where it is impossible to counter a Gramsci-style covert attack?"

---

I need to learn more of what a Gramsci style covert attack is, however perhaps a solution lies in his own weaknesses?

Gramsci is an interesting figure in that he was disillusioned AND deluded. He had no knowledge of the reality behind the scenes of the criminal elites sponsoring Marx and Stalin so he had no context to figure out that he was fighting an imaginary fight for the wrong reasons. It's like he was working for people he didn't realize were against his ideals. Like an idiot savant he may have accomplished much 'insight' into his obsession, but we need to counter with a more informed reality.

I suggest that exposing truths that are conveniently neglected is still a good tactic.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 03-25-2005, 05:12 PM
this this is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 281
Default Re: ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC THREATS IN THE CURRENT DECADE (2000-2010)

Alright, a better answer. Gramscism is just what we've been living with for a long time in the West, gradually turning us from sensible to senseless.

It is exactly the struggle I entered to on this forum with the Communism angle. Even though those who take the time to understand the news, think they are open minded, their minds are largely shaped already by schooling, parenting and other indoctrination from the media.

Bush is the danger, or is it Monsanto? Well yes, but don't forget the Soviets. No, that collapse was likely a ruse. Haven't thought of that till now? Join the club. We all have to recognize that very little of our thoughts are that original. In a way we have to accept that we might be better of forgetting all we know and starting over again. Even reversing every one of your assumptions just might start to break your own programming.

As I mentioned before, how many people look both ways before crossing the road? Why?
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 03-27-2005, 02:45 PM
Draken Draken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 896
Default Judaic Communists AND Judaic Nazis

In reference to my previous post <a href="http://www.revisionisthistory.org/communist.html">Judaic Communists</a> on this thread the following link is extremely important. It seems Zionists are playing both sides - not that that is a surprising statement; by now this particular aspect of NWO deception should come as no surprise to this forum.
For me though, living in Europe, this information is new: I've never heard of these cases of fake Nazism in America.

<a href="http://judicial-inc.biz/Klassen.htm">Real Nazis or more Jewish hoaxes?</a>

<a href="http://judicial-inc.biz/Hate_Hoax_summary.htm">FBI statistics on "Hate Hoaxes"</a>

And this seems to be their modus operandi:

<a href="http://judicial-inc.biz/Red_lake_pyschotic.htm">Benzodiazepines and Methamphetamine</a>
__________________
Three things are sacred to me: first Truth, and then, in its tracks, primordial prayer; Then virtue–nobility of soul which, in God walks on the path of beauty. Frithjof Schuon
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 04-24-2005, 08:51 AM
Draken Draken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 896
Default Regarding Truebeliever's "Soviet Atrocities" Thread: Satanic Communism

From the article <a href="http://www.cephas-library.com/nwo/nwo_the_planned_destruction_of_christianity.html"> The Planned Destruction of Christianity</a> (all emphasis mine./Draken)

HERE ARE SOME RELEVANT QUOTES:
"The historian Rene Sedillot...calculates that the [French] 'revolution', on account of the terrorism and the civil war, claimed at least 600,000 victims." Juri Lina (author; quote taken from his book <a href="http://www.geocities.com/jyrilina/english/scorpion.html">Under the Sign of the Scorpion</a>) ((NOTE: The French Revolution took place from 1789 through 1799.))
"The entire membership of the [Russian] Communist Party, which in 1918 numbered perhaps no more than 100,000, was turned into an instrument of murder. Its aims were two-fold: to inspire dread and horror among the Russian masses, and to exterminate the middle and upper classes...these people were the best that Russia had. They were the leader class. They were the priests, and lawyers, and merchants, and army officers, and university professors."

Frank L. Britton (author; quote taken from his book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0911038825/qid=1114352720/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-9851688-9389517?v=glance&s=books">Behind Communism</a>)
"Before the Bolsheviks [i.e., the Russian Communists] seized power there were 360,000 [Russian Orthodox] priests in Russia. At the end of 1919 only 40,000 remained alive."
Juri Lina (quoting author Vladimir Soloukhin; quote taken from Lina's book, Under the Sign of the Scorpion) ((Ed. Note: The above means that the Russian Communists exterminated 320,000 Orthodox priests in just two years!))

"1.7 million people were executed during the period 1918-19. A river of blood flowed through Russia... According to official Soviet reports from May 1922, 1,695,904 people were executed from January 1921 to April 1922. Among the victims were bishops, professors, doctors, [military] officers, policemen, gendarmes, lawyers, civil servants, journalists, writers, artists, nurses, workers and farmers...Their crime was 'anti-social thinking'." Juri Lina (from his book, Under the Sign of the Scorpion)

"During [Communist leader] Bela Kun's three month reign of terror [Ed. Note: in Hungary in 1919], tens of thousands of people "priests, army officers, merchants, landowners, professional people" were butchered." Frank L. Britton (from his book, Behind Communism)

"During the Spanish Civil War [Ed. Note: 1936-1939], Communists killed four thousand Catholic priests." - Richard Wurmbrand (pastor; author; quote taken from his book, <a href=http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0891073795/qid=1114352377/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-9851688-9389517?v=glance&s=books">Marx & Satan</a>)

...

The 'common thread' in the French, Russian, Chinese, and other Communist Revolutions consists of the following:
1.) Mass terror and murder was used to:
* bring in a totalitarian police state;
* eliminate entire 'classes' of people;
* suppress all opposition to the police state.

2.) Generally speaking, Christians (more than any other religious group) were especially targeted for imprisonment, torture, and execution.

I listed relevant quotes at the beginning of this newsletter to show you the categories of people that the Communists and other assorted Socialists (such as Fascists and Nazis) targeted. In general, one can easily see that these 'Revolutionaries' wanted to immediately remove the leadership (or potential leadership) of any opposition to their 'Revolution'. In some countries (such as Russia under the Bolsheviks) the entire middle and upper classes were targeted for 'extermination'. In particular, these 'Revolutionaries' targeted: any clergy (and often their followers) who would not 'play ball' with the Revolution; military officers; writers, artists, and other intellectuals; professors and teachers; merchants; independent farmers and other landowners; etc. ((Communists seem to have a particular hatred and fear of farmers and ranchers. This is because the farmer and rancher are NOT dependent upon the 'State' for their livelihood. Soviet Communists slaughtered and starved to death MILLIONS of farmers in the Ukraine (a part of the 'former' Soviet Union).

Another group of people the Communists (and other Socialists) particularly hate and fear are the preachers, pastors, and priests (i.e., the clergy) who have the courage to oppose and speak out against the totalitarian police state. During the French Revolution, the Spanish Civil War, the Russian Revolution, and the Communist takeover of China we find the clergy being viciously tortured and murdered in LARGE numbers. And after the Communists eliminated the vast majority of the clergy who opposed them, they then infiltrated their own Communist stooges into high positions within the church. ((NOTE: A book that details Communist infiltration into the Russian Orthodox Church is entitled <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0007E9Z6E/qid=1114352926/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-9851688-9389517?v=glance&s=books">How the Communists Use Religion</a> by Edgar C. Bundy 'Radio Liberty used to carry a very limited number of this book' you can call toll-free 800-544-8927 to order it.))

...

By a number of Reviewers of book: 'Behind Communism', we are told the book is essential for researchers. February 25, 2002 -

#1 Reviewer: Jeffrey Leach (Omaha, NE USA). Even a cursory interest in the so-called "far right" political movement will quickly turn up this little pamphlet. Behind Communism is available from a wide selection of groups, from Christian Identity to Neo-Nazi organizations. This is because the booklet addresses the main concern that all of these groups share: the Jews and their machinations. The cover is somewhat deceiving, as it shows a rather hazy image of Uncle Joe Stalin. This is surprising because the author admits that Stalin was one of the few non-Jews involved in the higher echelons of world Communism. It would seem a picture of Anna Pauker would be more appropriate, but apparently not. The booklet is written by Frank Britton and it seems to have been first published in 1951 or 1952, although my copy is not dated.

Britton starts his exegesis by examining the history of the Jews. He spends considerable space showing how their presence in Europe shaped both Christians and Jews. Christians, according to Britton, despised the Jews because of their tendency to dominate unpleasant occupations such as money lending and the like. The Jews themselves lived in self-imposed ghettos where they built up a rabid dislike of gentiles. It was from these ghettos that Communism and Zionism emerged. Britton's concern, of course, is with Communism. He sees Communism as a Jewish racial movement and that this accounts for the high percentage of Jews present in its ranks, especially at the top. Most of the pamphlet details the Russian revolution and how Jews brought about Communism. Pictures and names of prominent Jews are thrown about quite a bit. Britton points out that although Lenin wasn't a Jew, he was married to one, as was Stalin (Britton is often concerned with Jewish-Gentile marriages. He seems to feel that a Jewish bride is one step away from being a Jew.). The last section of the booklet attempts to show how Jews in America have time and again been involved in Communist plots. The Rosenbergs, Klaus Fuchs, the Hollywood Ten and others all make an appearance here. Britton finishes by listing name after name of Jews involved in Hollywood, from actors to directors to musicians.

I will say this is not the most hysterical anti-Jewish writing I've ever read. There is much worse out there. There are a few times Britton slips into slur, but most of the booklet tries to remain calm and reasoned. There are errors to be found. At one point, Britton points out that almost all of the Russian intelligentsia were Jews, due to educational preferences. Later, when discussing the Red Terror, Britton says that the Reds wiped out the entire upper class of Russia. If Communism is a Jewish movement, why would the Jewish Reds wipe out their racial comrades? Britton also says that Nicholas II was in the process of turning Russia into a constitutional monarchy when he was forced to abdicate. Everything I've read to date points to the contrary. Nicholas II was an autocrat who had no intention of giving up real power to the Duma or anyone else. Almost every attempt at reform made by the tsarist system was an abysmal failure. To credit Nicholas with this type of enlightenment is just wrong. Even if Nicholas was attempting this type of reform, it came WAY to late to do any good.

Behind Communism is an essential reference to anybody doing research on anti-Jewish groups. Reading this pamphlet alone will definitely give insights into how these people think and feel.

#2 Reviewer: The How, Why and Who of international Communism., March 2, 2003
Reviewer: Derek Pillion "OrthoByzEgypt" (Camp Hill, PA) - This stapleback pamphlet gives a summarized history of Communism, the Bolshevik/Communist Party in Russia, and Communist infiltration of American society and its institutions. The subject delineated here is the massive Jewish involvement in Communism. The author posists that the whole movement is a Jewish racial cause, with some gentile followers. BEHIND COMMUNISM is full of pictures, lists and diagrams showing who the Communists are. The top-dog Communist leaders, Lenin and Stalin are gentiles, but they were married to Jewish wives. Stalin is always portrayed as a virulent "anti-Semite" and pogromist, but he was married to the daughter of the Politiburo member Kaganovitch, and Stalin's daughter was married to Kaganovitch's son. Soviet Forign Minister Molotov's wife was also Jewish. In fact, she was the sister of Karp, owner of Karp's Import-Export Company in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

The latter part discusses the Communist Party in America, which had a disproportionate Jewish membership and whose members were highly educated professionals rather than working-class men. Many of those convicted of selling nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union were Jewish, such as the Rosenburgs. Finally the Hollywood film industry is shown as the world's leading producer of Communist propaganda. The author explains how Hollywood films are designed to cause race-hatred among black and Mexican minorities and at the same time instill whites with a sense of guilt about race relations. There are some instances where the author makes inapropriate remarks, but these are minimal. The tone is relativly balanced, maintaining a pro-Christian, pro-European viewpoint.

In all, BEHIND COMMUNISM rails against the romanticism that liberals attribute to the Russian Revoloution. When the Jewish Communists took power in Russia, all H-E-double-hockey-sticks broke loose. Tens of thousands of Christians were massacred, and five million landowners in the Ukraine were intentionally starved to death during the early 1930's to solidify Communist dominance and freedom of Religion was abolished.

Marx & Satan by Richard Wurmbrand, Paperback: 143 pages, Publisher: Living Sacrifice Book Co; (December 1, 1986) ISBN: 0891073795

The connection between Satan worship and communism, March 11, 2003
#1 Reviewer: Jill M. Heins (Lenexa, KS United States) Richard Wurmbrand's book was a revelation to me, and yet at the end I felt foolish that I hadn't seen the connection between Satanism and communism earlier.

Wurmbrand quotes Milovan Djilas, the Yugoslav communist leader, who wrote of Marx and his cohorts, "They make a semblance of believing in the ideal of socialism, in a future society without class. In reality, they believe in nothing but organized power."

The precursors to the Russian Communist party called themselves succinctly, "Hell." This Satanic parallel undoubtedly prompted Dostoyevski to write, "The Demons" and Wurmbrand successfully argues that communism is simply a front organization for Satanism.

While the Nazi passion for the occult is more well-known, the communist's lesser-known fascination with it is disturbing. Russia has a vested interest in keeping many of Marx's writings unknown--they would sound bizzare to people unaware of the demonic connection or those naive enough to buy into the class struggle argument.

Anatole France, the renowned French communist writer, was not only a Satan worshipper but had a special chair dedicated to presiding over Satanist rituals. It had horned armrests and legs covered in goat fur. This unusual chair was exhibited in Paris, but brought to Moscow. Oddly, it's not exhibited by the Russians. However, black magic rites are still practiced at Marx's tomb so it's not difficult to imagine that France's chair is still used today.

Hess taught Marx that socialism is inseparable from globalism. The communists have traditionally used race and class struggle as a crutch and are undoubtedly proud of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton's work to promote revolution for revolution's sake in the US.

Peter Verhovensky is quoted as saying, "We are already terribly powerful . . . Jurors who acquit criminals are completely ours. The District Attorney who trembles in court not to be considered liberal enough is ours. Administrators, men of letters, we are many, very many, and they don't know they belong to us."

Wurmbrand's argument is convincing and well-researched. He encourages others to delve into the connection between Satan worship and communism, and I hope a journalist takes him up on his offer.

#2 Reviewer: David Marshall (Seattle area) May 22, 2004 - This book deserves serious consideration. As a grad student in China studies, I once made the mistake of referring to Marx and Satan in the footnote of a paper for a very by-the-book scholar. He circled the title in heavy red ink and wrote in the margin with even heavier sarcasm: "Might the book have a bias?"

Richard Wurmbrand certainly did have a bias, though not the one the "one star" reviewers below accuse him of. No, this is not "anti-Semitic drivel;" Wurmbrand was himself a Jew, persecuted by the fascists for his race, who loved his people. No, he is not a "reactionary fanatic," nor does this book represent "the scarier mindscapes of the Bible Belt." Wurmbrand is actually from Romania, which is I believe some distance from Texas, and you read his many fascinating books, you will find he was actually quite thoughtful. But yes, he was biased against communism. He spent many years in slave labor camps, was tortured, and saw friends die. (A slave labor camp, I might point out, is rather a scarier place than a Southern Baptist church; tens of millions of people died in such places in the last century.)

Despite the provocative title of this book, such experiences did not render Wurmbrand bitter or unhinged. His argument here is not a vitriolic piece of ad hominem; rather it is a serious suggestion, backed up, it seems, by a fair amount of circumstantial evidence.

It is commonly argued that Marx had nothing to do with the crimes of communism. Even if Wurmbrand's central thesis does not convince you, the evidence he offers does at least show the spiritual or psychological continuity between Marx and the crimes committed in his name.

The book has its flaws, true. The evidence Wurmbrand offers is not overpowering. Wurmbrand sometimes takes phrases like "demonic fury" a little too seriously; I suspect it was often mere hyperboli. Also, he is not critical enough with his sources. Although he does not base anything on it, in one place he seems to accept the "Ritual Satanic Abuse" scam, for example.[Scam?/Draken] Finally, the book is a bit gossipy.

Still, Wurmbrand knows a great deal about communism. He seems to have read very widely in primary sources, and provides strongly suggestive quotes to back up his thesis. He shows caution at times, and is knowledgeable and thoughtful.

A few months ago I came across a dissertation in my university library entitled "The Role of Atheism in the Marxist Tradition." The author of the dissertation, a journalist named David Aikman, wrote it under the guidance of Donald Treadgold, editor of the Slavic Review and a leading historian of the Soviet Union. It was interesting to me to find that Aikman took Wurmbrand's thesis very seriously, and in his own study of Marx, Engels, and Lenin, had found additional evidence that seemed to point in the same general direction.

What did Marx and his chief disciples really believe? As Wurmbrand admits, Marx and Satan is not the final word on that question. But I think this little book does point out a set of facts that more conventional history largely ignores, and that ought to be considered; and not only as an intellectual curiosity. Wurmbrand was not an arm-chair critic, but a witness, survivor, philosopher, and passionate lover of God and man. The facts he points out, and his observations on this subject, are worth considering, if not just for their own sake, for the sake of those who died.

#3 Reviewer: "poixr" (Orem, Utah United States) - Excellent!!!, April 21, 2004
This book dives right into something that is ignored by even most critics of Marx - his satanic roots.

Marx, like Engels, both were involved in satanic teachings of "the communist rabbi" Moses Hess. He wrote a number of satanic poems. In fact, his doctoral thesis was entitled "I hate all the gods." Marx was delving into satanism long before he knew anything about economics. He had no knowledge of the plight of the working man or "proletariat" at that time.

One of the critics of this book says that it is just anti-semetic and rediculous. Interestingly, if you look at that same critic's other reviews, his other reviews are for the band T.S.O.L which is an L.A. "death rock" band which he favorably compares to early Christian Death. His other reviews are for the band "Death Church" (which he likes) and "Jesuseater."

It's pretty hard to take a guy like that serious in a review of a book about satanism and Marx.

Anyway, this book sheds quite a bit of light on the topic of Marx's turn to satanism during his school years. Marx's poetry about desiring to destroy the world and take the place of the creator is downright haunting.
__________________
Three things are sacred to me: first Truth, and then, in its tracks, primordial prayer; Then virtue–nobility of soul which, in God walks on the path of beauty. Frithjof Schuon
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 04-24-2005, 08:25 PM
truebeliever truebeliever is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,768
Default Re: Regarding Truebeliever's "Soviet Atrocities" Thread: Satanic Communism

People have a feeling that Communism is evil but it is ALWAYS surpassed in peoples eyes by Hitler and fascism. I think it's the cold blooded organisation that gets them going...though thats up for debate.

I dont want to paint Hitler in too nice a light but I believe he was far surpassed in brutality by Stalin...far.

An awful lot of the dead after 1943 were because of the intense focuss of bomber command on the vital basic infrastructure of Germany...they could barely afford to feed their own army and people let alone the millions of workers and concentration camp inmates. Hence the wasted emaciated bodies of the camps.

This was not deliberate. Does anyone think the efficient Germans would starve to death their workers? What sense does that make?

Germans supported Hitler because just to the East of them was a gigantic monster that threatened to devour Europe. In fact...read Marx's Communist Manifesto...he lays it out - world domination is the means and the end...Communism will not stop until it is world wide. It's simple and to the point.

Stalin had 30,000...thats 30,000 armoured vehicles on or near the border. What were they for? Touring?

Stalin was cocky...he had the support of powerful Western forces and he knew it. By 1937 with the huge build up of Germany he knew he may have been double crossed or at least his bluff called. Then came the great purges of his Officer class.

Germans in general simply could not understand why the West was not supporting them in a crusade to rid the world of what was undoubtable a COMPLETELY evil system...Stalin murdered his Generals hand over fist when they failed him in battle...Hitler sacked them.

I'm starting to believe the 'holocaust' and so many of the other stories regarding Germanies behaviour in the war have been grossly exaggerated to cover for the obvious...the Wests support for one of their most evil creations to date. They needed a good reason to be supporting a monster like Stalin.

You can only do that when you are supposedly fighting a worse one.
__________________
[size=medium]\"The Office\" is the greatest comedy...ever. [/size]
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 04-28-2005, 11:05 AM
Draken Draken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 896
Default Communist Subversion of Religion by Christopher Story

<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1361995/posts">Communist Subversion of Religion</a>

by Christopher Story, Part 1

Canon Wright invites a KGB Agent to Coventry


In 1979, a British clergyman purporting to be a priest of Christ called Canon Kenyon Wright occupied the post of ‘Director of the International Ministry’ at Coventry Cathedral, arguably the most pagan of the British Anglican cathedrals (and the location of a televised parade of clerics who danced in a snakelike formation behind a fanged Chinese dragon on 23rd March 1998).



He organised a conference on ‘Disarmament and Hunger’ under the joint auspices of the Christian Peace Conference [CPC], a Soviet front, and the Cathedral–inviting a Vice-President of the CPC, Metropolitan Gregarios of the KGB-penetrated Russian Orthodox Church, to speak. All propaganda activities of the Russian Orthodox Church, of which this appearance was on, ‘were’ organised by the Department of External Church Relations [DECR] of the Moscow Patriarchate, established in 1946 under Stalin, a former trainee priest himself. In 1943, Stalin had made a ‘concordat’ with the Russian Orthodox hierarchy under which, in return for the restoration of certain earthly rights, they promised to support Soviet foreign policy. He then set up a State Bureau, the ‘Council for the Affairs of Religion’, which effectively placed the activities of the Church under the control of the NKVD (later the KGB).


This in turn ensured that only those clergy willing to promote Soviet propaganda and the Party’s ‘General Line’ (grand strategy) were appointed Metropolitans (Bishops). Therefore, in inviting Metropolitan Gregarios, Canon Wright (a long-term fan and supporter of the Soviets) knew precisely that he was inviting a KGB-approved church official. We have ourselves separately proved that Catholicos Patriarch Ilya II, the friend of the Archbishop of Canterbury and of the far left Bishop Richard Harries of Oxford, has been a KGB agent since 1962. It is a certainty, therefore, that Gregarios was likewise.


In 1981, Wright was appointed General Secretary of the Scottish Churches Council, an office he held until 1990. At the same time, he was a Vice-President of the British Regional Group of the CPC, as well as being a member of the international Committee of the CPC. Canon Wright has all along been hyperactive in his commitment to the penetration, politicisation and subversion of the ecumenical movement: for instance, in 1982, he drafted the important theme-setting ‘conference message’ along with Metropolitan Gregarios for a conference called by the Russian Orthodox Church for ‘Religious Workers for Peace for Saving the Sacred Gift of Life from Nuclear Catastrophe’, attended by representatives of Buddhism, false Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Talmudic Judaism, Shintoism, Sikhism and Zoroastrianism. The draft text reiterated the contemporaneous Soviet line demanding world disarmament.


After this initial period of direct collaboration with the KGB front, Canon Wright was given a key role at a Moscow-based propaganda event, incorporating attendees from 90 countries. In 1984, the CPC organised an international seminar entitled ‘Towards a Theology of Peace’ in Budapest, which was attended by representatives of 19 ‘Christian’ denominations from 30 countries. The main discussion group at this event was chaired by Wright. And, underling Wright’s emergence as a senior CPC official, he took part that same year in a CPC delegation to Sweden, Finland and Germany with the aim of winning support from leading churchmen for Soviet disarmament policy. His fellow-delegates included the Chairman of the Christian Peace Conference, Karoly Toth; its Secretary-General, Lubomir Mireojovsky; and Metropolitan Filaret, one of the CPC’s KGB controllers.

Orthodox KGB Agents Exposed on Purpose


Under ‘glasnost’, the Soviets later revealed that Metropolitan Filaret, along with A.S. Buyevsky, the ‘Lay Secretary’ of the Moscow Patriarchate’s Department of External Church Affairs, were KGB agents, and that Buyevsky was a member of the World Council of Churches’ Executive and had used his position to influence the policy of the World Council so that it reflected the Soviet ‘line’ in all respects.


These exposés were made as a means of throwing Western observers off the scent– a standard Soviet deception method, based on the correct assumption that weak-minded Western analysts would be ‘satisfied’ with such revelations, assuming them to represent a break with the past; thus, the West could be relied upon to overlook the fact that Russian Orthodox Church leaders have never, over the past 57 years, acknowledged their subservience to Soviet intelligence on the instructions of the Party, and their long-term compliance with Stalin’s requirement that in exchange for the ‘restoration’ of certain previously confiscated ‘privileges’, they must ensure the total subservience of their stance and propaganda to that of the Soviet Party-State and its world revolutionary agenda. A.S. Buyevsky, by the way, was appointed ‘Lay Secretary’ of the DECR in 1946, and remained in his position for 40 years.


The genuine KGB defector Anatoly Golitsyn has revealed that in 1958, Khrushchev summoned the top leadership of the intelligence community to examine alternative means of achieving the Soviet Party’s aim of dominating the world by methods other than nuclear war–an encounter which gave rise to the momentous refurbishment of revolutionary strategy referred to by Golitsyn as the ‘long-range strategy’ which has reached an advanced stage of development under Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin (selected by the strategic collective to front successive stages of the strategy). The intelligence community reported that they had so many agents and agents of influence in place throughout the West that they could be deployed in a strategy of global deception [Peter Wright, Spycatcher, Heinemann Australia, 1987]. In Golitsyn’s more precise terms, the Party instructed the KGB to realise its full strategic revolutionary potential, and mass two-way penetration of the Party and the intelligence services then took place, to facilitate this momentous development.


In 1987, the KGB officer Mikhail Gorbachev–who had attended the crucial 21st CPSU Congress in 1961 as one of 5,000 hand-picked delegates–presided over a conference in Moscow, attended by 1,000 personalities from all over the world, to support his call for a ‘nuclear-free world for the survival of humanity.’ The purpose of this meeting, as with all Soviet influence-building operations, was to create and galvanise a ‘constituency’ which could be relied upon to ‘call for’ the line being espoused by the Soviet strategists. ‘Useful idiots’ like Yoko Ono, Graham Greene, and Peter Ustinov, vociferously supported this event.
The attendees were divided into groups, and the subdivision for ‘religious personality’ was organised by the top leadership of the KGB-controlled Christian Peace Conference. On his return from this event, Canon Kenyon Wright gave an account of it on a local radio show. In that interview, Wright boasted of having spoken with President Gorbachev, Raisa Gorbachev and Eduard Shevardnadze; and Wright even conveyed a message of good will from Gorbachev to the people of Scotland. Throughout the interview, Wright enthusiastically supported Soviet disarmament propaganda.


In September 1990, it was announced that the Christian Peace Conference, the Soviet front, was closing down and that (nevertheless) Canon Kenyon Wright was to be its ‘Interim Secretary’. This of course raised all kinds of questions. What was a Church of England Canon doing acting in an official capacity for a KGB front–and which was supposed to be ‘closing down’? As it happened, Wright was now at a critical stage of his service to the Soviet KGB. For in parallel with his ‘ecumenical’ activities, Canon Wright was simultaneously agitating behind-the-scenes for the establishment of a Scottish Parliament, and had been using his influence in international and domestic ecumenical foray to orientate ‘religious’ constituencies in favour of Soviet
disarmament strategy.


We will show that Wright’s ‘new’ interest in Scotland reflected the KGB-GRU’s ultimate objective–the closure of the United Kingdom’s Trident nuclear submarine bases, which are located there. The even greater objective is the dismemberment of the United Kingdom itself, in fulfillment of Lenin’s sub-strategy of ‘separation precedes federation’, which would mean that the international legal doctrine of Impossiblity of Performance would apply, given that the original signatory of innumerable treaties and accords, the United Kingdom, would have ceased to exist.

British Churchmen Activated by the KGB


The truly mind-blowing dimension of this long-term KGB offensive operation against Britain and the West is that it has been fronted all along by Canons of the Church of England, who have been exploiting and influencing ‘soft ecumenical’ opinion in favour of Soviet disarmament strategy. And the Soviets have been exceptionally thorough, as always, with their influence-building and penetration operations in the loose, flaccid ecumenical movement. For instance, the once respected Keston College, Oxford, which specialises inter alia in religious affairs in the ‘former’ Soviet Bloc, has been thrown off course by the far-Leftist Canon Oestreicher, of the British Council of Churches. We discovered this when checking whether the Bishop of Oxford, Richard Harries, and the Archbishop of Canterbury, had been briefed by Keston College, in advance of their trip to Tbilisi in 1993, that Catholicos Patriarch Ilya II of Georgia had been a KGB agent since 1962. The Canon in charge of ‘foreign affairs’ at Lambeth Palace, headquarters of the Church of England, confirmed to us that Keston College had failed to provide this crucial information.


Canon Keynon Wright moved from Coventry to Scotland in 1981, which significantly was the year when NATO and the British Government decided to base Britain’s Trident submarines there. He immediately set about using his ecumenical clout to leverage the setting up of a Scottish Parliament, which now threatens Trident and therefore the security of the United Kingdom and the whole of Europe.


Today, Canon Wright is involved in agitation for a ‘Civic Forum’–linking all Scottish local Councils, Trade Unions, voluntary organisations and of course ‘soft’ ecumenical groupings–which is intended to ‘advise’ the Scottish Parliament. In due course, this body will agitate for the removal of the Trident bases, claiming (falsely) to represent Scottish opinion, and thus providing the Parliament with what could be interpreted as a ‘mandate’ legitimising any call for the removal of Trident the Parliament any make in due course.

PART 2

Communist Subversion of Religion, Part II
by Christopher Story

Everything He Touches is Politicised


From 1981 to 1990, Canon Wright was General Secretary of the Scottish Churches Council [SCC], the Scottish ecumenical organisation. He effectively politicised this body, converting it into a platform for pro-Soviet policies. And from 1985 onwards, Wright developed what he called the ‘Inter-Church Process’. The Minutes of a meeting of the Council’s Committee on ‘Community, Justice and Peace,’ held on 17th March 1986, which are in our possession, dealt with every political subject under the Soviet sun and made no mention whatsoever of Jesus Christ. Among the subjects covered in the Minutes were nuclear issues, links with Eastern Europe; the Helsinki Assembly of the European Forum of Christian Women; the forthcoming visit to Scotland of a delegation from the Soviet Women’s Committee; Canon Wright’s report on his attendance at the Christian Peace Conference in Bulgaria, also attended by representatives of the Orthodox, Congregational and Baptist Churches; and a forthcoming British Council of Churches visit to Moscow. The Council’s Committee also ‘welcomed’ an invitation extended to Canon Wright for him to attend a Round Table Conference in Moscow. The Minutes of its meeting further show that the SCC was involved in agitprop operations concerning Namibia, South Africa and Latin America, and that in respect of developments in Nicaragua, the SCC believed that the ‘contras’ ‘seemed to have no objective other than the destabilisation of Nicaragua.’



There was a report on a Church visit to China, and disappointment was expressed that a conference held in January on the ‘development of a common strategy in churches’ had not yielded much progress, since ‘churches still seemed to want to pursue their own programmes.’ But the Minutes added that ‘the initial reports on the Inter-Church Process’ were very encouraging.


Canon Wright has been highly effective in politicising virtually every dimension of Scottish ecumenical and church activity on behalf of the Soviets. In this endeavor, he has prominent allies. It is, after all, the notorious Bishop of Edinburgh, the Most Rev. Richard Holloway, Primus of the Scottish Episcopal Church, who has pronounced from the pulpit that he is an atheist, campaigns for the decriminalisation of marijuana, challenges traditional Christian views on the sanctity of marriage, promotes the recognition of homosexual relationships despite the condemnation of Paul in his Epistle to the Romans (Chapter 1), and has, since 1997, openly backed the ordination of practising homosexuals. Both men have openly promoted ‘liberation theology’, which was immediately adopted as the new basis for ‘church unity’ in the context of the so-called ‘Inter-Church Process’.


The first stage of this subversion campaign was the establishment of a nationwide network of interdenominational groups to discuss a booklet entitled ‘What on Earth is the Church For?’ Based on the same principles as the corrosive ‘Alpha Course’ which masquerades as an induction into Christian belief but which in actual fact questions all faith, demolishes true Christian belief and substitutes a politicised ‘social agenda’, the booklet contained a loaded questionaire enabling participants to state what they thought ‘the church’ should be doing. The atheistic BBC seized upon the results and proclaimed that the majority supported its proposals for increased ecumenism (pantheism). In the second stage, regional conferences were held in 1987, at which the Roman Catholic Cardinal Hume called for a commitment to church unity. By 1989, the Catholic Biships of Scotland had agreed to the final stage–namely, to join the other church bodies in ‘calling for’ a new ecumenical organisation named ‘Action of Churches Together in Scotland–ACTS’. As a result of these manoeuvres, the ecumenical organisation in Scotland, masterminded by the KGB-controlled organisation in Scotland, masterminded by the KGB-controlled Canon Kenyon Wright, was able to claim much greater authority.


No sooner had this umbrella group been formed than it started at once to meddle in security affairs and to promote Soviet policies–calling for the abolition of Britain’s nuclear deterrent, the Trident submarine system. According to the ‘Catholic Herald’ [29th November 1991], the Revd. Maxwell Craig, General Secretary of ACTS, wrote in support of Scottish Christian CND (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament), to the Lord Advocate for Scotland, Lord Fraser, complaining that ‘the preparation and planning for the use of weapons of indiscriminate and mass human destruction’ was an indispensable ingredient of the Trident project, and that ‘the whole project may be illegal in international, military and criminal law. The people engaged in these activities are being employed by Her Majesty’s Government to undertake work which renders them liable to prosecution, in terms of the Nuremberg’s principles, for crimes against peace, and in the event of use, for war crimes’. In a statement to the newspaper, the Revd. Craig added: ‘ACTS has traditionally been opposed to Trident. We are now trying to place that opposition before the people in a constructive way.’

How Wright Set Up the Scottish Convention


Writing in the Church of Scotland’s magazine ‘Life and Work’, May 1989, Canon Kenyon Wright described himself as General Secretary of the Scottish Churches Council, a Methodist Minister, and Chairman of the Scottish Constitutional Convention. As a consequence of his activities in the 1980s during the various strikes of that decade, Wright had forged links with many Labour and Liberal-Democrat MPs (the Liberal-Democrats being of the extreme left, but masquerading as ‘middle-of-the-road’ politically). These MPs could be relied upon to ‘call for’ whatever he suggested, in essence, since they were of the same political orientation.


As indicated, Wright used these contacts and the leverage he was able to generate through his ‘Inter-Church Process’ to politicise the ecumenical movement. One outcome of this activity was that a subcommittee of the Scottish Churches Council, the previously mentioned Community, Justice and Peace Committee, was given precise direction by Canon Wright. As confirmed in the Roman Catholic weekly paper ‘The Universe’ of 27th November 1988, delegates from seven Christian denominations issued a statement from Scottish Churches House, Dunblane (headquarters of the Scottish Churches Council), backing ‘calls for’ a Scottish Convention. The paper noted that ‘the delegates...agreed that the convention should consist not just of politicians, but also of representatives of the main Scottish institutions such as education, the law and the Churches’.


The statement also promoted the Soviet formula for democracy in the West (as opposed to ‘democratism’–the illusion of democracy–practiced in the East) as follows: ‘In addition, we need to move towards a new form of democracy which ensures a greater degree of real and constant participation in our society. We recognise...that the constitutional convention is not in itself a Scottish Assembly, but could be the proper forum within which all matters relating to such an Assembly would be discussed’.



In his ‘proposals (dated July 1986) for a conference held in March 1987 as an element of the Inter-Church Process’ (‘process’ being a tell-tale word derived form Soviet usage, for it is always the process which is coveted, for leverage purposes, not the pretext), Wright called for a session to debate the political future of Scotland, urging the SCC to invite MPs and trade unionists to the session in order to establish a ‘consensus’ with delegates. Within a few short months, the outcome was the establishment of a steering committee to launch the Constitutional Convention.

As we have seen, in the 1980s, Canon Kenyon Wright–who ought to be concerned exclusively with spiritual matters–devoted his time to making the ecumenical movement serve the Soviet political agenda. Through his involvement in strikes and the ‘peace movement’, he forged relationships with radical MPs. Scotland was fertile territory for his subversive activity anyway, since there was much hostility there at the time against the Conservative Government; and since Canon Wright had converted Scottish Churches House into the focal point for this opposition, it was a short step from fomenting political dissent to developing a movement for the establishment of a separate Scottish Parliament. Predictably, this is a hotbed of revolutionary action and dissent, posing a direct and lethal threat to the continued existence of the United Kingdom over the medium term.

Conclusion

It is clear from the record (of which the preceding analysis is a condensed summary, based upon comprehensive documentation) that Canon Kenyon Wright is a long-term KGB agent or (at the very least) agent of influence, whose preoccupation is not the Life and the Truth of Jesus Christ but the subversive agenda of the Leninist World Revolution.

He has remained hyperactive both on the open stage and behind-the-scenes in politicising the ecumenical movement and the churches, and in broadening his artificial groupings to form constituencies which ‘call for’ components of the Soviet agenda–of which the abolition of Britain’s nuclear deterrent is the top priority. The spin-off is to be the catastrophic breakup of the United Kingdom, which will have global implications–although it is well on the way, given Britain’s poisonous membership of the European Union collective with its destructive regional policy which divides the country into ten regions owing ‘allegiance’ to Brussels.
Most interestingly of all for students of Soviet strategy: you have just read the outline of a long-range Soviet subversive operation against the United Kingdom which can be traced back without discontinuity to the 1970s.

Soviet Analyst, Vol. 26 Number 4, pp. 5-7
__________________
Three things are sacred to me: first Truth, and then, in its tracks, primordial prayer; Then virtue–nobility of soul which, in God walks on the path of beauty. Frithjof Schuon
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 04-29-2005, 01:55 PM
nohope187 nohope187 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,354
Default Re: Communist Subversion of Religion by Christopher Story

I'm pretty sure the police state in the UK is a model for the US to copy. Has anyone read anything new about the North-Amerikan Union (NAU)Canada,Mexico, and USA? From time to time, I read somethin' about it and then it disappears into the ether again. :-P
__________________
So pardon me while I burst into flames.
I\'ve had enough of the world and it\'s people\'s mindless games.
So pardon me while I burn, and rise above the flame. Pardon me, pardon me, I\'ll never be the same. -Brandon Boyd
:roll:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
int: :evil: :-...
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 05-26-2005, 08:02 PM
nohope187 nohope187 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,354
Default Re: Communism still alive and kickin' your ass

IN BED WITH HITLER
THE TOTALITARIANS RESPOND

By: Alan Stang

#Alan,
Please pardon the terseness of this message but…
Man, you seriously got to give it a rest. I mean, BushCo are probably the most despicable s---heads ever to run this country, but to call them Communists is patently absurd, and you should be embarrassed to show your face in public for being so obtuse as to say so, or for circulating this absolutely ridiculous screed. This piece of anti-intellectualism would be laughed out of a third grade classroom. I mean, you can’t possibly be serious?
Bush et.al are Fascists. They employ none of the tenets of Communism. They are totalitarian fascists, marrying State and Corporate power. The last thing on earth these people would ever want is to dismantle private ownership in favor of State ownership, or provide communal education, health care, housing, and pensions, which are the hallmarks of Communism. They are the ultimate privatizers, and Socialism is their mortal enemy.
What country have you been living in? Have you been in a coma the last 25 years?
All you manage to do by circulating this harebrained garbage is undermine our ability to get rid of these people on legitimate grounds. You make the resistance look like a bunch of shrill, dimwitted, sectarian idiots.
Please, for all of our sake, stop. Or learn how to read and do research.
Sheesh!
_________________________________
A friend of mine loves to repeat what his grandmother used to say. "When you throw a rock in among some hogs, the one that screams is the one you hit." The screaming hog we quote above is the editor-in-chief of an internet site, whose primal scream I quote in its entirety, except for his name and url, which we leave it to him to promote; and the insertion of some hyphens to blunt his profanity.
His message is one of many in the growing avalanche of response to my piece, below, entitled "The Coming Resistance," and many readers have asked me to respond. I leave it to you to decide how well I read and do research, and whether I should be laughed out of a third grade classroom. His main complaint is that I call Communist world government traitor George W. Smirk a Communist. Our visiting expert says he is instead a Fascist.
As you can see, he is furious, so furious he makes himself silly. Why? Because I am exposing his dirty, little secret. He is a far leftist, a collectivist, who bills his internet publication as part of the "new counterculture," which means he counters our American culture. Notice his breathtakingly loving rendition of Communism; his moralistic assertion that Smirk & Company are mortal enemies of Socialism.
For too long, far left cohorts like him have been allowed to get away with the preposterous assertion that Communism and Fascism are opposites. In the neat formulation our visiting expert and his collectivist colleagues endorse, the Communists, on the left, offer the benefits that flow from complete government control; the fascists, on the "far right," are the "ultimate privatizers."
The tactically brilliant reason the Communists defend this utterly phony formulation to the death—your death—is that it allows them to discredit everyone who is not a Communist as a Fascist, or a Nazi. That is why Hollyweird keeps the "Nazi threat" alive, a full sixty years after Viennese homosexual prostitute Hitler finally flushed himself in Berlin.




The way the metastasizing Holocaust industry tells it, one would think the Nazis were about to stage a coup. There are thousands of horror stories about Communism waiting to be told, but Hollyweird will not tell them, despite the fact that Communism remains a mortal threat today; to do so would destroy this immensely valuable weapon in the arsenal of dialectical materialism.
So, what is the difference between Communism and Fascism? There is a difference in style, the same difference there is between people. But that’s all it is. If you and I do exactly the same thing, there will be differences, for the obvious reason that you and I have different personalities, different styles.
That won’t change what we are doing. Thus, Clinton, our first "black" President, drops his pants and asks for sex. Smirk, our first "homosexual" President, does not. It doesn’t matter because they are doing the same thing, going to the same place. It is a difference without a distinction.
Thus, the Communists want total government. The opposite of total government is—the envelope please!—no government. But the Fascists do not want no government. They too want total government. Remember? That was how Mussolini "made the trains run on time." That was why FDR’s Washington spoke so lovingly of him.
You already knew that. I am simply reminding you of something you already knew. Yes, there were the inevitable differences—Mussolini was horrified by Hitler’s homosexual Nazis, but they agreed on the basics. Hitler was a Socialist. How do we know? He said so. The term "Nazi" is merely the contraction formed from the first two syllables of the German words for National Socialist. Didn’t Adolf hand out the same handouts our visiting expert attributes to Communism? Yes, he did. It’s called "bread und circuses."
Corporal Hitler said this: "[T]here is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine, revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where there are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communists always will." (Quoted in Hermann Rauschning, Hitler Speaks, London, T. Butterworth, 1940)
So, Hitler was a man of the far left. Remember that he and Stalin began World War II as treaty allies. Nazi Foreign Minister Von Ribbentrop said he felt at home in Moscow. There is a little known photo of Hitler in a procession carrying the coffin of a deceased Communist leader and wearing Communist insignia. The proof goes on and on. Yes, Hitler attacked Stalin. Mafia chieftains attack each other. So what? Haven’t you ever seen a movie?
How does this apply to President Smirk? First, remember that the United States government installed the Communists in power in Russia, and then saved the Soviet Union again and again from collapse. I have proven this so many times, I do not need to repeat myself here. Go to my writing and look.
The District of Criminals installed the Communists in China. The District of Criminals installed the Communists in Cuba. And on and on. It is not at all an exaggeration to say that without the decisive influence of the District of Criminals, Communism would be nothing more than a footnote in a college textbook. Instead, we have far leftist Richard Nixon, who confessed his Socialism when he said, "We are all Keynesians now." Keynes was of course sodomite economist John Maynard Keynes, a hero in the Soviet Union.
Finally, our visiting expert says Smirk & Co. are the "ultimate privatizers." Is that true? It is just as true as it was under Hitler. Yes, there is endless talk about "privatization." What does "privatization" mean? It means no government. It means private people doing business without government interference. It means people to people communication. Is that what we have?
No, we have just the opposite. We have "Socialism for the rich." The District of Criminals tells us that its "trade agreements" like NAFTA, amount to "free trade," because "free trade" sounds so appealing. Do they? No, they impose literally thousands of pages of government regulations. We have less free trade than we had before.
Yes, you could call this Fascism. But as we have seen, Fascism and Communism are the same thing at heart. It is as Communist as it is Fascist. Doesn’t the District of Criminals already own outright almost half the land area of the United States? Yes, it does. Isn’t it moving rapidly to control it all? Yes, it is. Isn’t government control of the land the first plank of the Communist Manifesto? Jawohl!
The reason we must call Smirk a Communist is that it drives the Communists crazy. As we have seen, calling him a Communist ruins the immensely helpful dialectical tool they have used for decades to terrify and neutralize opposition. Many people shrink from opposing the Communists for fear of being called a Nazi. Most important, the fact that Communism and Nazism are basically the same puts the Communists in bed with Hitler, where they belong.
Yes, our visiting expert is the hog we hit. Go back to your sandbox, Sonny. We won’t play your game.
__________________
So pardon me while I burst into flames.
I\'ve had enough of the world and it\'s people\'s mindless games.
So pardon me while I burn, and rise above the flame. Pardon me, pardon me, I\'ll never be the same. -Brandon Boyd
:roll:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
int: :evil: :-...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American Gulag............Coming Soon Barbara Resistance is not futile 2 10-07-2007 04:29 PM
Cleveland Women Put In Gulag General Conspiracy Discussion 0 05-14-2006 04:18 PM
Communism vs. Capitalism SeC Opinions 5 12-15-2005 03:28 PM
The Income Tax Gulag Resistance is not futile 0 12-06-2005 01:54 PM
Communism vs. Capitalism SeC Opinions 7 11-06-2005 01:22 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.